President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) APEC envoy, Lien Chan (連戰), yesterday discussed the idea of signing a cross-strait peace agreement during a meeting with Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤), drawing criticism from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which said this constituted a violation of Ma’s “10 guarantees.”
During his 55-minute meeting with Hu in Honolulu, Hawaii, prior to the main APEC leaders’ summit scheduled for yesterday and today, Lien put forward the issue of signing a cross-strait peace agreement, saying he hoped both sides “could start to exchange views on the peace issue.”
Lien expressed the hope that both sides could review the issue in due time, but that this should be a more long-term goal.
Photo: AFP
In Taipei, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) criticized Lien, saying his remarks suggested that “Ma’s ‘10 guarantees’ are a lie.”
The DPP was referring to the “10 guarantees” Ma gave late last month that include “one framework, two prerequisites, three principles and four assurances” that he said would need to be in place before Taiwan would consider working toward a peace accord with China.
DPP spokesperson Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁) said Lien should have focused his talks with Hu on issues relating to international trade.
“That Lien broached the [peace agreement] issue with Hu shows that the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] has already started to negotiate with the Chinese Communist Party [CCP] on the peace accord behind closed doors,” Chen said.
Noting that Ma had initially included negotiating a peace accord in his “golden decade” policy, but then later said a peace accord would not need to be limited to a decade, Chen added: “After Lien’s meeting with Hu yesterday, it seems that the negotiations aren’t going to take a decade as Ma said they would: They have already started. Ma has already started negotiations on a peace accord.”
Saying that since the annual KMT-CCP summit began in 2005 and a Lien-Hu communique was signed, which included a point on resuming cross-strait negotiations to achieve peace, Chen said: “Ma’s unilateral decision to use the results of the 2005 KMT-CCP closed-door negotiations as the guiding principle to negotiate a peace accord with China is using the will of one person and one party to decide the fate of the country.”
“The move is pushing Taiwanese toward fear and an uncertain future,” he said, adding: “Ma should tell us what he’s worried about and explain why his cross-strait policies are so contradictory and rash.”
During the Lien-Hu meeting yesterday, the two also touched on the so-called “1992 consensus.” Hu said both sides should stick to the consensus and safeguard the peaceful development of cross-strait ties, while Lien said the consensus is the basis for the peaceful development of cross-strait relations and the cornerstone of cross-strait trade benefits and prosperity.
Lien also urged China to speed up negotiations on a cross-strait investment protection agreement and follow-up issues relating to the cross-strait Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement.
According to Lien, Hu acknowledged the complex nature of the issues and said that they would be resolved one by one.
Additional reporting by Rich Chang
Translated by Jake Chung, Staff writer
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or