A comment by US Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta earlier this week about arms sales to Taiwan has raised concern on Capitol Hill.
At a news conference in Indonesia on Sunday, Panetta praised China for what he described as a “mild” response to the latest offer by the administration of US President Barack Obama to upgrade Taipei’s existing F-16A/B aircraft.
“I think we’d given the Chinese a heads-up as to what was going to take place, and in the end I think they handled it in a professional and diplomatic way and we appreciate that,” he said.
At least one Democratic member of the US Congress is now considering a letter to Panetta asking just what kind of a “heads-up” China was given.
Supporters of Taiwan in the US are worried that the Obama administration may have broken existing agreements and consulted Beijing before deciding not to sell the more modern F-16C/Ds to Taiwan.
A number of senior administration officials — including US Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Kurt Campbell — have strongly denied that China was consulted.
In 1982, then-US president Ronald Reagan gave Taipei “Six Assurances” regarding US policy toward Taiwan.
One of these “assurances” was that the US would not consult China before making decisions about US arms sales to Taiwan.
An expert on the US-Taiwan relationship said that “technically” the statement by Panetta was not a violation of the Six Assurances because he only indicated that Washington had informed Beijing of its decision to sell arms, not that there had been consultation before the sale.
However, another expert warned: “Many of us worry there is some secret consultation with Beijing over arms sales to Taiwan.”
“Panetta’s remark about a ‘heads-up’ is the closest they may have come to admitting it,” the expert said.
As a direct result of the remark, the lawmaker now considering a letter to Panetta could list the Six Assurances in the communication.
If he goes ahead, other members of the Congressional Taiwan Caucus would ask to cosign the letter.
An e-mail containing a news agency report of Panetta’s remarks in Indonesia — with the “heads-up” statement clearly highlighted — has been widely circulated on Capitol Hill.
Coen Blaauw, an official with the Formosan Association for Public Affairs, told the Taipei Times: “It would be prudent right now to remind the Obama administration of the content and reach of the Six Assurances.”
“We don’t want the territory covered to become a gray area. There is concern that some talks with the Chinese may contain elements of consultation,” he said.
“Panetta’s statement has made people uneasy and this would be a good time to underscore the pertinence of the Six Assurances,” he said.
The concern over Panetta’s statement comes as the Obama administration’s plan to upgrade the F-16A/Bs has cleared its 30-day congressional review without objection.
A formal letter of acceptance still needs to be negotiated and signed.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS