Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was yesterday sentenced to 18 years in prison by the Taiwan High Court for taking bribes in relation to a series of bank mergers during his eight years in power, fined NT$180 million (US$5.95 million) and stripped of his civil rights for nine years.
His wife, Wu Shu-jen (吳淑珍), was sentenced to 11 years and fined NT$102 million in the same case and stripped of her civil rights for eight years.
The ruling overturned a ruling in November last year by the Taipei District Court, which cleared the former president and his wife of all charges over merger approvals during the second phase of his administration’s financial reforms, based on a lack of evidence that they received bribes from financial holding companies to ensure the mergers went in their favor. Chen and Wu’s son, Chen Chih-chung (陳致中), and daughter-in-law, Huang Jui-ching (黃睿靚), were also acquitted in that ruling.
Photo: Lo Pei-der, Taipei Times
Special Investigation Panel (SIP) prosecutors charged the defendants in December 2009, alleging that bankers had bribed the former president into pressuring the Ministry of Finance to approve the mergers during financial reforms promoted by the Chen administration to encourage greater consolidation in the banking sector.
In the November ruling Judge Chou Chan-chun (周占春) said that according to the Anti-Corruption Act (貪汙治罪條例), a public official who takes bribes in exchange for favorable decisions or policies violates the law, but since the Constitution does not give the president specific powers with relation to bank mergers, Chen Shui-bian could not have been bribed by the banks to influence the mergers.
The SIP appealed that ruling to the Taiwan High Court.
Photo: CNA
In addition to heavy sentences for Chen Shui-bian and his wife, Chen Chih-chung was sentenced to one year in prison and Huang to six months. The two were also fined NT$4 million and NT$2 million respectively.
In a written verdict, Taiwan High Court Presiding Judge Chang Chuan-li (張傳栗) said the powers of the president had expanded following seven constitutional amendments, concluding that “the president certainly could influence” decisionmaking on the merger of financial institutions.
Speaking to the media after the ruling, Chen Shui-bian’s lawyer Chen Wen-lung (鄭文龍) said his client was disappointed and would appeal the ruling.
Chen Shui-bian, Wu Shu-jen and Chen Chih-chung can all -appeal the ruling.
An official from Chen Shui--bian’s office, Chiang Chih-ming (江志銘) added that it was hard not to conclude that the sentence was politically motivated.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) spokesperson Chuang Ruei-hsiung (莊瑞雄) said court rulings in a democratic country should demonstrate consistency in their logic and that the judicial system had to be seen to be consistent and understandable in its rulings to be trusted.
The “erratic changes” in sentencing from the first to the second trials do not reflect such consistency, Chuang said, adding that it was little wonder people had lost faith in the judicial system.
The timing and divergent rulings are suspicious, Chuang said, adding that it was hard not to think that political motives were at play, given the presidential and legislative elections in January.
“The DPP adheres to the spirit of democracy and rule of law, and we hope the judiciary will focus on the need for a just trial so that the credibility of the judicial system can be restored,” Chuang said.
With translation by Jake Chung
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS