The war of words over the “Taiwan consensus” and the so-called “1992 consensus” continued yesterday as the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) described the former as “imaginary” and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) compared the latter to an “unauthorized construction.”
The DPP also said a story published yesterday by the Chinese-language China Times, which reported that DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said in the US that unification was a potential -outcome of the “Taiwan consensus” she initiated, was an “overinterpretation” of Tsai’s comment.
Asked by reporters in New York whether unification would be one of her options, Tsai, who was in the middle of her 10-day US visit, said: “When I say I do not rule out any possibility, I mean it,” adding that the DPP would engage China with an open-minded approach if Taiwanese supported such an approach.
Photo: CNA
“The DPP upholds democratic values above everything else, which is why it asserts that the ‘Taiwan consensus’ would be a process that engages all parties in society,” DPP spokesman Liang Wen-jie (梁文傑) told a press conference yesterday.
“However, that does not mean unification is the DPP’s preference or its position,” he said.
The DPP has always said that Taiwan is a sovereign and independent country and any change in the “status quo” would require a referendum, he said.
In a press release, President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) re-election campaign office spokesperson Ma Wei-kuo (馬瑋國) said that Tsai, the DPP’s presidential candidate, had so far failed to clarify her China policy and it was irresponsible to ask people to come up with solutions on her behalf.
Democracy was the driving force behind Tsai’s China policy, embracing the need for comprehensive dialogue rather than providing people with fixed answers, DPP spokesperson Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁) said.
While President Ma said talk about a “Taiwan consensus” was “empty” and likened it to “pre-constructed homes” on Friday, Chen described the “1992 consensus” as “unauthorized constructions” because the so-called consensus was reached by the KMT and China without the consent of Taiwanese, and had never been subject to legislative monitoring.
“A fragile agreement like this could not withstand the multifaceted and wide-ranging cross-strait engagement that will be needed in the future,” Chen said.
At a speech on Saturday evening in San Francisco, Tsai said building a Taiwan consensus through a democratic process would involve the participation of all Taiwanese and was the right direction to take.
The DPP has its own clearly defined position on Taiwan’s national identity and engagement with China, but was willing to sit down with everyone, including the KMT, to work out a consensus, Tsai told more than 1,200 supporters at a rally in Northern California.
“That is the ‘Taiwan consensus’ I am talking about — a democratic process,” she said, adding that only those who refuse to accept “democratic reality” would say “a means to an end” was more important.
As crucial as China policy is to Taiwan’s national affairs, Ma was barking up the wrong tree in his repeated attempts to force the DPP to accept the “1992 consensus,” she said.
“At the end of the day, how Taiwan engages with China is the more important issue and Taiwanese do not ask for much. All they want is a peaceful relationship with China,” she said.
All Taiwanese are entitled to participate in the decisionmaking process on such an important issue. Citing Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) decision to withdraw from the UN in the 1970s, Tsai said it was an example of how a decision made by one man or one political party could jeopardize a country.
On the most hectic day of her 10-day visit to the US, Tsai left New York on Saturday morning for a brief stop in Houston, Texas, before arriving in San Francisco in the evening. She is scheduled to visit Los Angeles, the last of six cities on her trip, before returning to Taiwan tomorrow night.
At a luncheon fundraiser in Houston, Tsai told more than 700 supporters that the current election was the first time a DPP candidate has been neck-and-neck with a KMT rival four months before the presidential election.
The DPP chairperson also highlighted “respect for democratic values” as the fundamental difference between the DPP and the KMT.
While most people perceive the DPP as more of a ‘grassroots’ political party, she said, “when you compare the two parties, you will find that the DPP is the one that stays true to Western democratic values.”
Meanwhile, several former officials and political advocates voiced their support for the “Taiwan consensus” yesterday, saying the initiative was in line with democratic principles and that the inclusion of unification as one option was “democratic common sense.”
The most important element of the consensus is that it would be established through a series of democratic procedures, Koh Se-kai (許世楷), Taiwan’s former representative to Japan, said at a forum.
Speaking on the sideline of a book-launching ceremony, former presidential adviser Peng Ming-min (彭明敏) said the “Taiwan consensus” was a “solid, rational and democratic” initiative because “in a democratic country, you do not exclude any option and accept the decision as long as the people are able to freely express their views.”
“Anyone with the slightest understanding of democracy would know that all major policies — particularly the direction of a country — should be decided by the people, rather than one single political party or one man,” said Jim Lee (李筱峰), a history professor and a political commentator.
“I do not support unification [with China], but if that is the people’s choice I would have to accept it. That is democracy,” Lee said.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS