Leaked US cables cast doubt on statements made by President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration that Taiwan’s presence at the World Health Assembly (WHA) was a result of direct communication with the WHO and that Taiwan’s designation as “Chinese Taipei” was acceptable and did not infringe on Taiwanese sovereignty.
Instead, the cables released by WikiLeaks suggest Beijing’s heavy involvement in the matter, with its insistence that Taiwan’s international participation be based on the “one China” principle.
For three consecutive years since 2009, Taiwan has taken part in the annual WHA meeting as an observer under the name “Chinese Taipei.” While Ma’s government has hailed the participation in the WHA as a major diplomatic achievement, it has been clouded by accusations that it has eroded Taiwan’s sovereignty.
Recent evidence came in May following the leak of an internal memo from the WHO, in which it said Taiwan is a “province of China” pursuant to an agreement the WHO signed with Beijing. The Ma administration sent a letter of protest in May, but to date the WHO has yet to respond.
US cables released by WikiLeaks recently provide more insight into what it took for Taiwan to be able to take part in WHA meetings.
In a confidential cable dated Dec. 24, 2008, the US embassy in Beijing quoted Taiwan Affairs Office Minister Wang Yi (王毅) as saying that “Taiwan’s international space, particularly [its] participation in the WHA, should be worked out on the basis of the ‘one China’ principle and through direct consultations between the Mainland and Taiwan.”
Wang was quoted in the cable as saying that Taiwan’s attendance at the WHA must rely on “cross-strait consultation” to find the “most suitable arrangement.”
Earlier the same year, Wang told visiting US academics on Oct. 31 that WHO Director-General Margaret Chan (陳馮富珍) could invite Taiwan to “participate” in the WHA meeting, but this would not give Taiwan “legal observer” status, according to a cable dated Dec. 5, 2008.
“Any progress that could be made on the WHO/WHA issue by next May in the absence of direct negotiations between China and Taiwan would be something short of formal observership,” the same cable quoted Chinese officials as saying.
In another cable dated March 24, 2009, the US embassy in Beijing said that its contacts were unanimous in predicting that there would be “a new arrangement” allowing Taiwan to participate in the WHA in May after Wang said in a CCTV interview on March 11 that he was “cautiously optimistic” about Taiwan’s participation in the UN agency because both sides now agreed to “oppose Taiwan independence” and uphold the “[19]92 consensus.”
Despite the fact that the WHA issue had not been put on the table in cross-strait negotiations shortly after Ma took office in May 2008, several cables issued by the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) showed that many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) figures brought up the subject with Chinese officials.
According to a cable dated Dec. 24, 2008, then-KMT vice chairman and Legislator John Chiang (蔣孝嚴) told the AIT that former vice president and KMT chairman Lien Chan (連戰) had raised the WHO issue in his meeting with Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) at the APEC meeting in November in Peru.
Lien was then Ma’s envoy to the APEC summit.
Hu responded by suggesting “Taiwan send someone to talk to PRC [People’s Republic of China] officials” and pointed to the KMT-Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forum, the cable said, also quoting Chiang as offering AIT officers a readout of a recording of the Dec. 20-21 KMT-CCP forum in Shanghai.
Chiang also told the AIT that he had discussed the issue with Wang at the forum and he was confident that Taiwan would be able to attend the WHA meeting in May 2009 in some “mutually acceptable status,” the cable showed.
Meanwhile, a cable dated Dec. 22, 2008, showed that the AIT noted that Ma tried to “lower public expectations” about the country’s participation in the WHA when he gave an interview with the Washington Post on Dec. 9, in which he said that “Taiwan just wanted to attend the WHA meeting. We are not asking for anything more.”
“This seemed a step back from Ma’s May statement that his goal was to secure WHO observer status under an appropriate name,” the AIT said in the cable.
Another AIT cable dated May 8, 2009, showed that then-AIT director Stephen Young was told by Ma on May 7 that Taiwan plans to focus on participation in WHA and WHO activities for the present and not to push to join other international organizations.
Taiwan will proceed cautiously because Beijing is worried the WHA observership breakthrough could produce a domino effect, the AIT said in the cable.
During the meeting, Ma attributed Taiwan’s success in joining the WHA to three factors. First, domestic efforts by the Democratic Progressive Party and past health ministers; second, senior KMT leaders, including Lien and former KMT chairman Wu Po-hsiung (吳伯雄), who mentioned the issue to Hu; and third, international support from the US, EU, Japan and others, the cable said.
DEATH THREAT: A MAC official said that it has urged Beijing to avoid creating barriers that would impede exchanges across the Strait, but it continues to do so People should avoid unnecessary travel to China after Beijing issued 22 guidelines allowing its courts to try in absentia and sentence to death “Taiwan independence separatists,” the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday as it raised its travel alert for China, including Hong Kong and Macau, to “orange.” The guidelines published last week “severely threaten the personal safety of Taiwanese traveling to China, Hong Kong and Macau,” MAC Deputy Minister and spokesman Liang Wen-chieh (梁文傑) told a news conference in Taipei. “Following a comprehensive assessment, the government considers it necessary to elevate the travel alert to orange from yellow,” Liang said. Beijing has
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) yesterday said that the Chinese Communist Party was planning and implementing “major” reforms, ahead of a political conclave that is expected to put economic recovery high on the agenda. Chinese policymakers have struggled to reignite growth since late 2022, when restrictions put in place due to the COVID-19 pandemic were lifted. The world’s second-largest economy is beset by a debt crisis in the property sector, persistently low consumption and high unemployment among young people. Policymakers “are planning and implementing major measures to further deepen reform in a comprehensive manner,” Xi said in a speech at the Great Hall
CIVIL DEFENSE: More reservists in alternative service would help establish a sound civil defense system for use in wartime and during natural disasters, Kuma Academy’s CEO said While a total of 120,000 reservists are expected to be called up for alternative reserve drills this year, compared with the 6,505 drilled last year, the number has been revised to 58,000 due to a postponed training date, Deputy Minster of the Interior Ma Shih-yuan (馬士元) said. In principle, the ministry still aims to call up 120,000 reservists for alternative reserve drills next year, he said, but the actual number would not be decided later until after this year’s evaluation. The increase follows a Legislative Yuan request that the Ministry of the Interior address low recruitment rates, which it made while reviewing
DETERRENCE: Along with US$500 million in military aid and up to US$2 billion in loans and loan guarantees, the bill would allocate US$400 million to countering PRC influence The US House of Representatives on Friday approved an appropriations bill for fiscal year 2025 that includes US$500 million in military aid for Taiwan. The legislation, which authorizes funding for the US Department of State, US foreign operations and related programs for next year, passed 212-200 in the Republican-led House. The bill stipulates that the US would provide no less than US$500 million in foreign military financing for Taiwan to enhance deterrence across the Taiwan Strait, and offer Taipei up to US$2 billion in loans and loan guarantees for the same purpose. The funding would be made available under the US’ Foreign Military