The controversy over the disputed Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台) should be viewed from an historical perspective and as an act of invasion by Japan against Chinese territory rather than an issue related to political and economic interests, a government official said yesterday.
“In the eyes of the people of China, it was an incident that cannot be compartmentalized from the history of intrusion into China by Japan. Japan should look at the issue from this perspective,” said Shaw Yu-ming (邵玉銘), chairman of the Coordination Council of North American Affairs (CCNAA).
The CCNAA, the headquarters of the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the US, was established as a counterpart to the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) after the termination of diplomatic ties between the US and the Republic of China (ROC).
Addressing a forum on the Diaoyutais, Shaw suggested Japan and China utilize international arbitration to resolve the dispute over the islands because they are both UN members subject to the UN convention that calls for parties to to resolve territorial issues peacefully.
Judging from the tension between Japan and China surrounding the Diaoyutais in the past, “the issue may well become a flash point,” and therefore, bringing the issue to an international court would be the only way to prevent military conflicts between the two countries, he said.
In response to questions from the Taipei Times on whether his suggestion would leave Taiwan no say in the matter given that the country has no access to international courts, he said that was less important than the fact that the Diaoyutais are currently controlled and administered by Japan.
If the international court rules that the islands belong to China and not Japan, “it would be good for us because China would agree that Taiwan owns the Diaoyutai Islands,” as it did in 1871 when the islands belonged to the Kavalan Prefecture administration office, now Yilan County, which was then incorporated into Fujian Province during the Qing dynasty, he said.
Earlier at the forum, Wu Jinan (吳寄南), director and senior fellow of the Department of Japanese Studies at Shanghai Institutes for International Studies, Shaw Han-yi (紹漢儀), a research fellow at the Research Center for the International Legal Studies at National Chengchi University, as well as other Chinese and Taiwanese academics, presented papers to rebut Japan’s claims to sovereignty over the islands.
Examining related legal claims and historical evidence under international law and traditional East Asian order, the academics concluded that the Diaoyutais belong to “China.”
Asked to comment on the conclusion, Shaw Yu-ming said he did not find it problematic saying the islands belong to China as opposed to the ROC.
“Like I said, the Diaoyutai Islands were incorporated into the Kavalan Prefecture administration office in 1837. At that time, the ROC had not been established. Furthermore, the ROC is also part of China. China is the generic term for the ROC and the People’s Republic of China [PRC]. This case shows why the ‘1992 consensus’ is necessary. For us, it’s the ROC, and for the mainland, it’s the PRC. Together, it’s China,” he said.
Shaw Yu-ming said he agreed to the suggestion made by several Chinese academics at the forum that “China shall publicly declare its position that the Diaoyutai Islands belong to Taiwan.”
“If we say that the Diaoyutais belong to ‘China,’ it would lead some people in Taiwan to wonder why they need to fight for sovereignty of the islands. But if China declares that the Diaoyutai Islands belong to Taiwan, which I think it would not oppose because Taiwan is part of its territory in China’s view, the problem would be solved,” Shaw Yu-ming said.
Shaw Yu-ming said he did not see his statement as being against the position of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) who, in an interview with two Japanese newspapers, the Yomiuri Shimbun and Nihon Keizai Shimbun in July, ruled out aligning Taiwan with China in dealing with issues related to the disputed islands.
“If China makes the declaration, it is just a statement, not collaboration whatsoever,” Shaw Yu-ming said.
Yesterday’s forum, the third of its kind following two held by Soochow University, was co-hosted by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) and National Chengchi University.
It was the first time MOFA has participated in the forum.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS