European lawmakers condemned the WHO in a letter of protest that accused the world body of undermining its own credibility when it referred to Taiwan as a province of China.
In a letter delivered to the head of the WHO, British MEP (EU lawmaker) Charles Tannock said he believed the body’s position on Taiwan to be “politically and morally flawed.”
WHO Director-General Margaret Chan (陳馮富珍), as a Chinese citizen, “risks calling into question [her] own personal impartiality and integrity” by terming Taiwan a part of China, Tannock wrote in a letter also signed by 20 other MEPs.
“No United Nations specialized agency has the right unilaterally to decide on the status in international law of any given country or territory,” the letter said. “As you well know, UN agencies and their staff are required to remain impartial and not to take instructions from, or show favor to, any national government.”
Tannock, who chairs the European Parliament-Taiwan Friendship Group, was asked by President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) during a visit to Taiwan last month to speak in favor of the nation using the term “Chinese Taipei.”
The request came in the wake of the release of a WHO internal memo released by a Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmaker that told agencies to refer to Taiwan as a province of China, pursuant to an agreement with Beijing.
Since 2009, Taiwan has been invited to observe the World Health Assembly (WHA), the WHO governing body, as Chinese Taipei, although the memo made clear that “there has been no change in the status of Taiwan Province of China.”
Tannock said he was “dismayed” by the revelation and that the world body’s “explicit reference to Taiwan as a province of China has no basis in international law.”
“It is therefore hard to avoid the conclusion that the People’s Republic of China has deliberately sought to compromise the independence and impartiality of the WHO for its own political purposes,” he wrote. “We urge you to change the WHO’s internal procedures to refer to Taiwan as ‘Chinese Taipei,’ the accepted nomenclature that Taiwan uses in other international organizations and structures.”
The letter was signed by lawmakers from a range of EU political groups, including 10 from the largest, the European People’s Party. Tannock is the foreign affairs spokesman of the smaller European Conservatives and Reformists Group.
The letter also called for Taiwan to be allowed to play a more meaningful role in the WHO, pursuant with a resolution passed by the European parliament last month.
“We believe that Taiwan, with its excellent healthcare sector and world-class doctors, has much to contribute to the WHO ... Healthcare is a basic human right and should never be exploited as a political pawn,” he wrote.
The Republic of China exited the UN, the parent body of the WHO, in 1971 after being replaced by a People’s Republic of China representative.
Government officials have lauded Taiwan’s inclusion as an observer in the WHA since 2009 as a “breakthrough” in international relations, although optimism was later dampened by the release of the WHO memo by DPP Legislator Kuan Bi-ling (管碧玲).
The memo was accompanied by the disclosure of other information reinforcing the claim, including WHO publishing policies and a mislabeled list of Taiwanese experts, leading the government to file a formal letter of protest on May 16.
Kuan said yesterday that she believed the MEPs’ letter to the WHO head was even more strongly worded than the government’s protest letter, which attracted controversy for discrepancies between the English and Chinese versions.
“The remarks in the MEPs’ protest letter makes it seem like they are defending their own country,” Kuan said. “It makes the government’s letter look weak.”
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say
EMBRACING TAIWAN: US lawmakers have introduced an act aiming to replace the use of ‘Chinese Taipei’ with ‘Taiwan’ across all Washington’s federal agencies A group of US House of Representatives lawmakers has introduced legislation to replace the term “Chinese Taipei” with “Taiwan” across all federal agencies. US Representative Byron Donalds announced the introduction of the “America supports Taiwan act,” which would mandate federal agencies adopt “Taiwan” in place of “Chinese Taipei,” a news release on his page on the US House of Representatives’ Web site said. US representatives Mike Collins, Barry Moore and Tom Tiffany are cosponsors of the legislation, US political newspaper The Hill reported yesterday. “The legislation is a push to normalize the position of Taiwan as an autonomous country, although the official US
CHANGE OF TONE: G7 foreign ministers dropped past reassurances that there is no change in the position of the G7 members on Taiwan, including ‘one China’ policies G7 foreign ministers on Friday took a tough stance on China, stepping up their language on Taiwan and omitting some conciliatory references from past statements, including to “one China” policies. A statement by ministers meeting in Canada mirrored last month’s Japan-US statement in condemning “coercion” toward Taiwan. Compared with a G7 foreign ministers’ statement in November last year, the statement added members’ concerns over China’s nuclear buildup, although it omitted references to their concerns about Beijing’s human rights abuses in Xinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong. Also missing were references stressing the desire for “constructive and stable relations with China” and
RSS