President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) apologized in person to the public yesterday for failing to consider public opinion in his nomination of Supreme Court Judge Shao Yen-ling (邵燕玲) to the Council of Grand Justices and denied having prior knowledge of her controversial ruling in a sexual assault case.
The president insisted that during their meeting on Monday, Shao had not told him that she was the chief judge of the case that involved a three-year-old girl, and said he would not have nominated Shao if he had been aware of her involvement in the controversial case.
“I want to apologize again for the nomination process … The process was not thorough because we only considered the nominees’ expertise and integrity. The government should never break away from public opinion and social perception,” Ma said in a press conference at the Presidential Office.
Photo: Lo Pei-der, Taipei Times
Ma’s personal apology yesterday came after he and Vice President Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) issued a statement late on Thursday night apologizing for the controversial nomination.
On Thursday morning, Ma named Tang Te-tsung (湯德宗) as the alternative nominee for the Council of Grand Justices, after Shao issued a press statement earlier that morning saying she had decided not to accept the nomination.
Shao caused a stir last year when she overruled a Taiwan High Court verdict in a sexual assault case on the grounds that the court could not prove a three-year-old girl had been sexually assaulted against her will because she had not resisted strongly enough.
The ruling prompted a group of Internet users to initiate the “White Rose Movement” last year, and tens of thousands of protesters joined a large-scale rally that called for the dismissal of judges they consider unsuitable and for legal revisions to provide better protection for -children and people with disabilities against sexual assault.
Shao came from a breed of “dinosaur judges” that needed to be replaced, the critics said.
Siew, who led the task force responsible for examining the nominees’ qualifications, also joined Ma at the press conference yesterday and apologized again for failing to provide sufficient information to Ma.
According to Siew, the task force spent 18 days collecting a list of 32 potential candidates and then Ma spent several days picking four nominees.
Judicial Yuan President Rai Hau-min (賴浩敏) yesterday also publicly apologized for recommending Shao for a seat on the council.
Rai said he knew Shao was responsible for the controversial ruling, but still included her on the nomination list because he saw Shao as “qualified talent” and that it was difficult to find a female nominee.
“I put too much emphasis on her experience and expertise and did not think the case would be an obstacle in the nomination process. I apologize for failing to consider public perception and causing trouble for the task force,” he said at the joint press conference.
When asked whether the Presidential Office replaced Shao only to resolve growing public criticism, Ma said members of the Grand Justice Council should know more than making judgments in accordance of laws.
“The judiciary should be independent, but not autocratic. We should always consider public perception, otherwise we won’t make any progress as a society,” he said.
Ma said he would instruct the Presidential Office’s secretary--general to adjust the nomination process, but declined comment when asked whether anyone should be held responsible.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS