The US “kept Taiwan in mind” during US President Barack Obama’s recent meetings with Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) and rejected any Chinese request that would have caused harm to Taiwan in negotiating the text of the two presidents’ Joint Statement, American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) Chairman Raymond Burghardt said yesterday.
Saying that China came into the negotiations on the joint statement with the intention of trying to “break new ground,” Burghardt said the US managed to make it a constructive statement “that in no way violate[d] any of Taiwan’s interests.”
Burghardt, who arrived in Taipei on Sunday to brief Taiwanese authorities on Hu’s state visit to the US last week, also held a roundtable meeting with members of the press.
China initially wanted the document to be called a “communique” and the phrase “[China’s] core interests” — present in the 2009 US-China Joint Statement when Obama visited Beijing — included in the text, but the US made it clear that “we prefer to have no joint statement rather than a statement which used the phrase ‘core interests.’”
The 2009 Joint Statement said both sides agreed to respect each other’s “core interests, but “the phrase ‘core interests’ had caused certain difficulties and misunderstandings,” Burghardt said, pointing to China’s territorial claims over the South China Sea.
Burghardt’s schedule included meetings with President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), National Security Council Secretary-General Hu Wei-jen (胡為真) and Democratic Progressive Party Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), among others.
Burghardt said this year’s Joint Statement had led some people to raise questions over Washington’s stance on cross-strait political negotiations, primarily over the part that said: “[T]he US looks forward to efforts by both sides to increase dialogues and interactions in economic, political and other fields.”
That part of the statement, which also appeared in the 2009 Joint Statement, has raised concerns that it was not in line with one of the “six assurances” issued in 1982 that the US would not push Taiwan to enter political -negotiations with China.
Burghardt said the US position was that “we don’t play any role as mediators, [and] have no interests to be mediators between the two sides of the strait.”
“We take no position on the negotiations between the two parties. The subjects that they negotiate are completely up to the two sides to decide — and very specifically up to Taiwan to decide,” Burghardt said.
“We have no impatience about it [political talks]. When to talk about subjects that could be described as political subjects is completely something [for] President Ma, the government and people of Taiwan to decide,” Burghardt said.
The nature of political talks “does not necessarily refer to sovereignty” in terms of China’s claims of sovereignty over Taiwan, but could, as per Washington’s definition, refer to “Taiwan’s participation in international organizations.”
On Taiwan’s requests to purchase F-16C/D fighter jets from the US, Burghardt said “it is still an open question,” adding that Washington would make its decision based on “threats to Taiwan” and “discussions with the leadership in Taiwan.”
Burghardt declined to comment on the progress of the evaluations.
“We will see. We just don’t talk about it until we do it. That’s really the answer. We are in talks with Taiwan,” he said. “We look for the right time to do things.”
In response to a question on comments made by US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates that sparked discussions on whether the US would change its Taiwan policy if the cross-strait security environment changed, Burghardt said Gates was talking about something “way, way in the future.”
China has an offensive military posture against Taiwan that has a number of components, which are “certainly not limited to missiles but including other weapons ... cyber warfare ... Taiwan as an espionage target and the ‘Anti-Secession’ Law as a kind of legal framework for offensive posture,” Burghardt said.
“In response [to that posture], Taiwan has a defensive military posture to defend itself ... Maybe that situation will someday change,” he said.
“If it does change, Taiwan could come to the US and say ... we need more of this and that. Because we listen to Taiwan and because our decision about defense aid to Taiwan is based on Taiwan’s perception of its needs, then we will talk about that,” Burghardt said.
Obama told China that Washington had a commitment to Taiwan and reaffirmed that the US would abide by the Taiwan Relations Act, he said.
The position held by Ma that Taiwan needs military strength so that it can negotiate with Beijing in a position of confidence “makes sense,” Burghardt said. “We respect that view of the Taiwan authority. We have repeated it to Beijing.”
Nvidia Corp yesterday unveiled its new high-speed interconnect technology, NVLink Fusion, with Taiwanese application-specific IC (ASIC) designers Alchip Technologies Ltd (世芯) and MediaTek Inc (聯發科) among the first to adopt the technology to help build semi-custom artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure for hyperscalers. Nvidia has opened its technology to outside users, as hyperscalers and cloud service providers are building their own cost-effective AI chips, or accelerators, used in AI servers by leveraging ASIC firms’ designing capabilities to reduce their dependence on Nvidia. Previously, NVLink technology was only available for Nvidia’s own AI platform. “NVLink Fusion opens Nvidia’s AI platform and rich ecosystem for
‘WORLD’S LOSS’: Taiwan’s exclusion robs the world of the benefits it could get from one of the foremost practitioners of disease prevention and public health, Minister Chiu said Taiwan should be allowed to join the World Health Assembly (WHA) as an irreplaceable contributor to global health and disease prevention efforts, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said yesterday. He made the comment at a news conference in Taipei, hours before a Taiwanese delegation was to depart for Geneva, Switzerland, seeking to meet with foreign representatives for a bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the WHA, the WHO’s annual decisionmaking meeting, which would be held from Monday next week to May 27. As of yesterday, Taiwan had yet to receive an invitation. Taiwan has much to offer to the international community’s
CAUSE AND EFFECT: China’s policies prompted the US to increase its presence in the Indo-Pacific, and Beijing should consider if this outcome is in its best interests, Lai said China has been escalating its military and political pressure on Taiwan for many years, but should reflect on this strategy and think about what is really in its best interest, President William Lai (賴清德) said. Lai made the remark in a YouTube interview with Mindi World News that was broadcast on Saturday, ahead of the first anniversary of his presidential inauguration tomorrow. The US has clearly stated that China is its biggest challenge and threat, with US President Donald Trump and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth repeatedly saying that the US should increase its forces in the Indo-Pacific region
ALL TOGETHER: Only by including Taiwan can the WHA fully exemplify its commitment to ‘One World for Health,’ the representative offices of eight nations in Taiwan said The representative offices in Taiwan of eight nations yesterday issued a joint statement reiterating their support for Taiwan’s meaningful engagement with the WHO and for Taipei’s participation as an observer at the World Health Assembly (WHA). The joint statement came as Taiwan has not received an invitation to this year’s WHA, which started yesterday and runs until Tuesday next week. This year’s meeting of the decisionmaking body of the WHO in Geneva, Switzerland, would be the ninth consecutive year Taiwan has been excluded. The eight offices, which reaffirmed their support for Taiwan, are the British Office Taipei, the Australian Office Taipei, the