Amid speculation that China has completed a prototype of a stealth aircraft that experts say could rival the US Air Force’s F-22 — the world’s only fully operational next-generation stealth fighter aircraft — national defense officials yesterday said they doubted the Chinese aircraft would be operational any time soon and raised doubts as to the veracity of information made public about the plane.
Deputy Chief of the General Staff for Intelligence at the Ministry of National Defense Shen Yi-ming (沈一鳴) said photographs, purportedly of the Chengdu J-20 aircraft, had generated speculation that China had entered the testing phase for the fifth-generation aircraft.
However, the authenticity of the photographs was “questionable,” Shen told the legislature’s Foreign and National Defense Committee.
Photographs published online and Chinese military sources cited by Japanese media last week seemed to indicate that a prototype version of the J-20 fighter had been completed, with taxi tests carried out last week in southwestern China.
The news came days before a visit to Beijing by US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, who will seek to repair military ties cut off a year ago by China when Washington sold billions of dollars worth of arms to Taiwan, as well as a visit by Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) to Washington.
The J-20 would come equipped with potent missiles and could reach the US territory of Guam with aerial refueling, although it would take between 10 and 15 more years to develop technology on a par with that of the F-22, reports said.
Defense industry publication Aviation Week said the J-20 was larger than expected — suggesting a long-range capability and the ability to carry heavy weapon loads.
Quoting Chinese military sources, the Asahi Shimbun reported that the People’s Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) planned to begin test flights of the J-20 as soon as this month, with plans to deploy the jet as early as 2017.
The J-20 “will become fully competitive with the F-22, in capability and perhaps in numbers, around the end of this decade,” Rick Fisher, an expert on the Chinese military at the International Assessment and Strategy Center, a US think tank, told Agence France-Press.
Dennis Blasko, a specialist on the PLA, said the timeline for development of the aircraft was “probably considerably longer than what most outside observers would estimate.”
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lin Yu-fang (林郁方) also played down the speculation about the fighter jet.
Lin said the emblem on the tail fin of the aircraft was not consistent with that of the PLAAF and that the emblems on the front wings were of a design no longer used.
Shen, who said Lin’s observations were “basically correct,” added that Russian analysis showed that China still lagged technologically in terms of manufacturing engines, radar, composite materials, instrumentation and electrical systems.
Asked by Lin if he believed China was incapable at this point of producing the J-20, Shen said he believed that was the case.
Western military experts have also expressed doubts over the J-20.
“I have yet to see proof of a test flight and testing for a prototype can take quite some time before production begins,” Blasko said.
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say
RSS