The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) yesterday expelled 10 Greater Tainan councilors from the party for supporting non-party nominees for city council heads in Saturday’s elections, leaving the KMT with only three members in the council.
The KMT’s Disciplinary Committee said the 10 councilors failed to abide by a party resolution that councilors should vote for themselves in the speaker election, and had therefore been punished.
“The 10 party councilors violated a party resolution and caused great damage to the party’s image and reputation,” committee director Juan Kang-meng (阮剛猛) said.
PHOTO: CHIEN JUNG-FONG, TAIPEI TIMES
The KMT had asked 13 party councilors in the city to vote for themselves in the city’s council speaker election as a strategy to prevent the election of independent candidate Wu Chien-pao (吳健保), who was removed from the KMT in February over his indictment on charges of fraud and bribing professional baseball players to manipulate games.
DPP Greater Tainan Councilor Lai Mei-hui (賴美惠) won the speaker seat with 30 votes, but Wu managed to receive 21 votes in the election. Of the 10 KMT councilors whose memberships were revoked, seven voted for Wu, while another three gave their votes to Lai.
The remaining KMT members in the Greater Tainan Council are Hsieh Lung-chieh (謝龍介), Lu Kun-fu (盧崑福) and Lin Yen-chu (林燕祝).
KMT Secretary-General King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) yesterday described the 10 councilors’ failure to obey party regulations as a “betrayal” and said the KMT would train new talent to reconsolidate its base in Tainan if the expelled members refused to cooperate with the party in the future.
“We’ve stated clearly before the election that any violation of party regulations will be given the most severe punishments and we must take disciplinary action [against the 10 members] in order to establish the party’s prestige,” King said in an interview with UFO Radio.
According to KMT regulations, members who are expelled from the party may not submit a membership application for two years. King said the party encouraged the 10 councilors to be cooperative with the party in the council.
As to the KMT’s defeat in the council head election for Taipei City, in which DPP Taipei City Councilor Chou Po-ya (周柏雅) won the vice speaker seat over incumbent deputy speaker Chen Ching-hsiang (陳錦祥) of the KMT by one vote, despite the DPP trailing by eight seats, King acknowledged the party’s lack of a monitoring mechanism to prevent runaway votes in the election and promised not to take disciplinary action against any Taipei City councilors without solid proof.
“The KMT will not do any member an injustice. The party’s Taipei branch decided not to oversee the voting and we respected its decision. We need to accept the outcome and take responsibility,” he said.
Chou became the first-ever DPP member to serve as Taipei City Council deputy speaker after he beat Chen by a 30-to-29 margin in the election. Director of the KMT’s Taipei branch Pan Chia-sen (潘家森) said six of the 30 KMT members did not vote for Chen, but lack of evidence made it difficult to punish them.
Taipei City Council’s KMT caucus on Monday asked all party councilors to prove their innocence by putting their fingerprint on written statements and some even suggested polygraph or fingerprint tests to determine those who violated party directives.
King yesterday said the KMT would not use such measures. It will review its voting procedures and will not rule out the possibility of abandoning secret ballots.
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say
RSS