The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) yesterday said it would file lawsuits against a group of politicians over allegations that the party condoned a shooting last month.
Aimed at Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers, the lawsuits were the first court challenges to be filed following the incident, in which Sean Lien (連勝文), a KMT Central Committee member and son of former KMT chairman Lien Chan (連戰), was shot on Nov. 26.
Reports said preliminary investigations show that the alleged shooter, Lin Cheng-wei (林正偉), mistook Sean Lien for local KMT politician Chen Hung-yuan (陳鴻源). The shooter was allegedly involved in a land dispute with Chen’s family.
Photo: Lo Pei-der, Taipei Times
DPP spokesperson Tsai Chi-chang (蔡其昌) said it was “undeniable” that the party had nothing to do with the incident, despite claims to the contrary from KMT lawmakers on the night of the shooting.
“We condemn the lies that infer the DPP was connected to the shooting,” he told a press conference at which video footage of the comments made by KMT lawmakers was released. “It’s clear … that some people made [those remarks] to ... influence the election.”
Legal action could be filed in the coming days against KMT legislators Chiu Yi (邱毅), Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕), Kuo Su-chun (郭素春) and Wu Yu-sheng (吳育昇). Lawsuits are expected to include charges of defamation, libel and possibly a charge of spreading rumors with the intent of influencing the elections.
The lawsuits come amid speculation that a sympathy vote likely cost the DPP victory in Greater Taichung, where it lost by only 2.2 percent. One lawmaker has advocated directly challenging the results.
“We should be encouraging [all three losing DPP candidates] to file challenges that invalidate the results,” DPP Legislator Wang Sing-nan (王幸男) said.
The party should look at taking legal action against several TV personalities, he said.
The remarks under scrutiny include a tirade by KMT Legislator Chiu Yi (邱毅) on a TV talk show, in which, minutes after the incident, he accused DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) of condoning the actions of the shooter, who Chiu said was a DPP supporter.
Video footage provided by the DPP showed Kuo and Wu telling a campaign rally in Taipei County that they wanted to see supporters condemn violence by voting for KMT candidates.
Separately, Lu told supporters in Greater Taichung the shooting was a political “dirty trick.”
“We hope that most folks can denounce the act of violence tomorrow by voting for [KMT Sinbei City mayoral candidate] Eric Chu (朱立倫) ... We must teach those who cause mischief a lesson,” Kuo said.
Lawyer Chang Tien-chin (張天欽) said the remarks likely constituted enough evidence to file charges.
The DPP said the main purpose of the lawsuit was to recover the party’s “tarnished image.”
Wu said the lawsuit did not worry him, adding that he had only called on voters to vote against violence rather than against the DPP.
“I did not imply in any way or accuse the DPP or anyone [of the shooting]. I didn’t describe [the shooting] as a political assassination [attempt],” Wu said.
Kuo said she was trying to calm KMT supporters down after the shooting.
Meanwhile, Minister of the Interior Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) said he did not oppose releasing video clips of the shooting, but would respect the decision by prosecutors on the matter.
Additional reporting by Flora Wang and Loa Iok-sin
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say
RSS