Reaction to former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) acquittal in a bribery trial appeared to fall along political lines yesterday, with the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) mayoral candidates urging voters to show their discontent with the ruling with their ballots on Nov. 27, while their Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) opponents played down the case.
The Taipei District Court on Friday acquitted Chen and his wife, Wu Shu-jen (吳淑珍), of charges that they laundered money and took bribes from bankers in exchange for help facilitating bank mergers. Nineteen co-defendants were also cleared of charges of money laundering, breach of trust and insider trading because of a lack of proof, according to Judge Chou Chan-chun’s (周占春) ruling.
Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) yesterday said he “respected the ruling in his capacity as president of the Executive Yuan,” but added that he was “afraid that there were more people who found the verdict unconvincing and unacceptable than those who respected the judges’ opinions.”
PHOTO: CNA
The court contended that there was no “considerable relationship” (direct connection) between the money the financial holding companies gave Chen and his position as president of the country.
Even if the former president did interfere in the bank mergers by arranging a meeting with or calling on then-minister of finance Lee Yung-san (李庸三) to voice “his support for” the mergers by Cathay Financial Holdings Co (國泰金控) and Yuanta Financial Holding Co (元大金控) respectively, this would only mean that Chen had overstepped his authority.
The ruling said that Chen making the telephone calls had nothing to do with the execution of his presidential power. Therefore, the alleged bribe taking by a public servant was found to not have happened in Chen’s case, it stated.
Since the money involved in the case had been identified as “not being the incomes from major crimes,” there would be no such charge as money laundering, according to the ruling.
Asked to comment on the verdict, which said Chen did not have discretion to intervene in the merger of financial institutions just as President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) did not have the discretion to address issues such as airport baggage carts and the difficulty of buying train tickets, Wu said he “respected the metaphor.”
The premier said that the judges, by drawing the parallel, “made noticeable Ma’s characteristics that he has integrity and that he cares about people’s suffering and thus wishes the Executive Yuan to improve the problems so that the government can better serve the people.”
Other than that, Wu said there was no comparison between Chen and Ma.
The biggest difference was that Ma cared about the needs of the people and did not profit from attending to these issues, whereas Chen took several billions of NT dollars and used his influence to enable small financial firms to acquire large state-owned ones, Wu said.
While Chen’s office hailed the ruling as “belated justice” and urged the court to immediately release Chen, who has been detained since Dec. 30, 2008, the prosecutors in charge of the case criticized the court’s verdict.
Spokesman of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office Special Investigation Panel Chen Hung-ta (陳宏達) said the judges of the collegial panel in the case held a different understanding of the president’s authority from the practical understanding held by the judiciary.
The judges have “excessively narrowed” the definition of the authority of the president stipulated in the Constitution, Chen Hung-ta said, adding that such a definition could mean that whoever is the president can do whatever he or she wants as long as it is not in the scope of his or her official authority.
The collegial panel at the Taipei District Court urged the public not to wage a war of words or plunge into quarrels because of the ruling. Lin Po-hung (林柏泓), one of the three judges on the panel, stressed that it reached its verdict based on legal precedents rather than political consideration.
Lin said he hoped the public would read carefully the reasons of the ruling so that they could understand the panel’s thoughts and decision in the case.
Unconvinced, some members of the pan-blue camp criticized the ruling, accusing the judges of using every possible means to “rationalize” the former president and his wife’s conduct of taking money from big enterprises, including labeling the money Chen Shui-bian and his wife took from Cathay and Yuanta as either “political donations” or “a payment to ‘acquire the knowledge of the government’s attitude’” in the bank mergers.
If the reasons the court used to find the couple innocent of bribery charges are subsequently upheld, any public servant could take bribes as long as they are not exercising their legal authority, they argued.
KMT Secretary-General King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) yesterday said the KMT respected the ruling, but added that the prosecutors’ decision to appeal the case will help reveal more truth.
KMT mayoral candidate for what will become Sinbei City Eric Chu (朱立倫) also said he respected the verdict, but added he believed that many people disagreed with the ruling.
“I believe that many have a different opinion. These people should come out and vote,” he said. “If you don’t vote, you will regret it the next day.”
Meanwhile, KMT mayoral candidate for the area that will become Greater Kaohsiung Huang Chao-shun (黃昭順) said she will start a signature drive to oppose the result.
“The ruling, which suggested that people who took money illegally will not be punished, is not acceptable to most people. A signature drive will be launched to push for a revolution in the judicial system,” she said on the sideline of a campaign event yesterday.
DPP politicians appeared more low-key on the issue.
In response to press queries, DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), who is also running as the party’s Sinbei mayoral candidate, said that she believed Chen being found not guilty would not have a negative impact on her chances in the election later this month.
DPP Taipei City mayoral candidate Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) and Kaohsiung Mayor Chen Chu (陳菊), who is running for re-election against Huang, would not comment on any possible impact of the ruling on their campaigns.
DPP spokesperson Tsai Chi-chang (蔡其昌) said voters are more concerned about who is capable of leading the municipalities than other matters.
ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY MO YAN-CHIH AND RICH CHANG
Taiwan is projected to lose a working-age population of about 6.67 million people in two waves of retirement in the coming years, as the nation confronts accelerating demographic decline and a shortage of younger workers to take their place, the Ministry of the Interior said. Taiwan experienced its largest baby boom between 1958 and 1966, when the population grew by 3.78 million, followed by a second surge of 2.89 million between 1976 and 1982, ministry data showed. In 2023, the first of those baby boom generations — those born in the late 1950s and early 1960s — began to enter retirement, triggering
ECONOMIC BOOST: Should the more than 23 million people eligible for the NT$10,000 handouts spend them the same way as in 2023, GDP could rise 0.5 percent, an official said Universal cash handouts of NT$10,000 (US$330) are to be disbursed late next month at the earliest — including to permanent residents and foreign residents married to Taiwanese — pending legislative approval, the Ministry of Finance said yesterday. The Executive Yuan yesterday approved the Special Act for Strengthening Economic, Social and National Security Resilience in Response to International Circumstances (因應國際情勢強化經濟社會及民生國安韌性特別條例). The NT$550 billion special budget includes NT$236 billion for the cash handouts, plus an additional NT$20 billion set aside as reserve funds, expected to be used to support industries. Handouts might begin one month after the bill is promulgated and would be completed within
The National Development Council (NDC) yesterday unveiled details of new regulations that ease restrictions on foreigners working or living in Taiwan, as part of a bid to attract skilled workers from abroad. The regulations, which could go into effect in the first quarter of next year, stem from amendments to the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) passed by lawmakers on Aug. 29. Students categorized as “overseas compatriots” would be allowed to stay and work in Taiwan in the two years after their graduation without obtaining additional permits, doing away with the evaluation process that is currently required,
NO CHANGE: The TRA makes clear that the US does not consider the status of Taiwan to have been determined by WWII-era documents, a former AIT deputy director said The American Institute in Taiwan’s (AIT) comments that World War-II era documents do not determine Taiwan’s political status accurately conveyed the US’ stance, the US Department of State said. An AIT spokesperson on Saturday said that a Chinese official mischaracterized World War II-era documents as stating that Taiwan was ceded to the China. The remarks from the US’ de facto embassy in Taiwan drew criticism from the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation, whose director said the comments put Taiwan in danger. The Chinese-language United Daily News yesterday reported that a US State Department spokesperson confirmed the AIT’s position. They added that the US would continue to
RSS