Despite a government promise to protect domestic industries against the dumping of cheap Chinese products, business leaders yesterday accused the government of lacking effective policies to block illegally imported merchandise from China and to protect local industries.
“Although many bedding products from China are banned from being imported into Taiwan, shipment after shipment are smuggled in, and most can be found in supermarkets,” Taiwan Bedding alliance chairman Huang Kuang-yi (黃光藝) told a press conference at the legislature. “The government opened the door, but no one is guarding it.”
Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Pan Meng-an (潘孟安), who accompanied the business leaders at the press conference, said that when the government signed the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) with China in June, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) promised to protect traditional industries, which are often in a disadvantaged position.
The ECFA came into force earlier this month.
“However, when we look at the budget for the next fiscal year, the central government’s budget on protecting disadvantaged industries for 2011 is 27 percent lower [than this year],” Pan said. “The government under the leadership of Ma is incapable of blocking the dumping of Chinese merchandise, nor can it actually protect Taiwanese businesses. I wonder if it is trying to help or kill traditional industries.”
Taiwan Ceramic Industries Association consultant Yu Teh-er (游德二) and textile industry operator Hung Kuo-kai (洪國凱) recounted how some businesses were able to import Chinese merchandise without being caught.
“A lot of wholesalers purchase clothing items from China, but since they can’t import clothes from China directly, they register their business in Hong Kong or Macau, and import these Chinese-made clothing items from Hong Kong and Macau,” Yu said. “When shipments of such clothing items come into Taiwan, the tags are altered, but no one is checking them.”
Yu, meanwhile, said ceramic tiles made in China are first shipped to Indonesia and then “imported” into Taiwan.
“Indonesia doesn’t make ceramic tiles, so how can the government check these products if the budgets are cut?” Yu asked.
The previous day, angry bedding makers staged a protest against what they claimed was the government’s failure to stem a tide of illegally imported Chinese-made bedding, which they said was flooding the local market.
Leading the protest outside the Directorate-General of Customs (DGC) in Taipei, Huang asked how Chinese products, which are banned from Taiwan, could be on sale everywhere unless government officials were turning a blind eye.
The protesters proceeded to the Control Yuan to demand an investigation into whether the DGC and the Bureau of Foreign Trade had broken the law by failing to stem the illegal imports.
Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) Chairman Huang Kun-huei (黃昆輝), who joined the protests, said that before signing the ECFA, the Mainland Affairs Council and other government departments had promised to protect traditional industries, with the council giving assurances that it would “guard the gate closely.”
By allowing banned Chinese goods to flood the market, the government was failing to enforce the law, he said, adding that this was tantamount to tolerance for breaking it, and such a government was not fit to remain in office.
LIMITS: While China increases military pressure on Taiwan and expands its use of cognitive warfare, it is unwilling to target tech supply chains, the report said US and Taiwan military officials have warned that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could implement a blockade within “a matter of hours” and need only “minimal conversion time” prior to an attack on Taiwan, a report released on Tuesday by the US Senate’s China Economic and Security Review Commission said. “While there is no indication that China is planning an imminent attack, the United States and its allies and partners can no longer assume that a Taiwan contingency is a distant possibility for which they would have ample time to prepare,” it said. The commission made the comments in its annual
DETERMINATION: Beijing’s actions toward Tokyo have drawn international attention, but would likely bolster regional coordination and defense networks, the report said Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s administration is likely to prioritize security reforms and deterrence in the face of recent “hybrid” threats from China, the National Security Bureau (NSB) said. The bureau made the assessment in a written report to the Legislative Yuan ahead of an oral report and questions-and-answers session at the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee tomorrow. The key points of Japan’s security reforms would be to reinforce security cooperation with the US, including enhancing defense deployment in the first island chain, pushing forward the integrated command and operations of the Japan Self-Defense Forces and US Forces Japan, as
‘TROUBLEMAKER’: Most countries believe that it is China — rather than Taiwan — that is undermining regional peace and stability with its coercive tactics, the president said China should restrain itself and refrain from being a troublemaker that sabotages peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region, President William Lai (賴清德) said yesterday. Lai made the remarks after China Coast Guard vessels sailed into disputed waters off the Senkaku Islands — known as the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台) in Taiwan — following a remark Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi made regarding Taiwan. Takaichi during a parliamentary session on Nov. 7 said that a “Taiwan contingency” involving a Chinese naval blockade could qualify as a “survival-threatening situation” for Japan, and trigger Tokyo’s deployment of its military for defense. Asked about the escalating tensions
The Ministry of Economic Affairs said it plans to revise the export control list for strategic high-tech products by adding 18 items under three categories — advanced 3D printing equipment, advanced semiconductor equipment and quantum computers — which would require local manufacturers to obtain licenses for their export. The ministry’s announcement yesterday came as the International Trade Administration issued a 60-day preview period for planned revisions to the Export Control List for Dual Use Items and Technology (軍商兩用貨品及技術出口管制清單) and the Common Military List (一般軍用貨品清單), which fall under regulations governing export destinations for strategic high-tech commodities and specific strategic high-tech commodities. The