A new Pentagon report on the Chinese military concludes that Beijing is rapidly expanding its armed forces “to deter, delay or deny” any possible US support for Taiwan in case of a conflict.
The report warns that despite the efforts of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) to increase economic and cultural ties, China’s military buildup continues unabated.
“The balance of cross-strait military forces continues to shift in [China’s] favor,” the report says.
The long-awaited analysis, which comes about six months after its promised delivery date, paints a grim picture at a time when US-China relations are already strained over problems with North Korea and Beijing’s disputed territorial claims in the South China Sea.
Titled Annual Report on Security Developments Involving China, the 74-page document says China’s military growth and plans remain largely a mystery to the US.
At the same time, Beijing’s continued refusal to reveal its military’s intentions “increases the potential for misunderstanding and miscalculation,” the report says.
“Extreme secrecy is increasingly difficult to reconcile with China’s role in the integrated global economy, which depends on transparency,” it says.
“Despite a reduction in tensions ... the possibility of a military conflict with Taiwan and US military intervention remain the PLA’s [People’s Liberation Army] most pressing long-term military concerns,” the report says.
“A potential cross-strait conflict will drive China’s military modernization as long as China’s leaders judge that the permanent loss of Taiwan could seriously undermine the regime’s political legitimacy and hold on power,” it says. “As part of its planning for a Taiwan contingency, China continues to develop measures to deter or counter third-party intervention, including by the United States, in any future cross-strait crisis.”
“China’s approach to dealing with this challenge is manifest in a sustained effort to develop the capability to attack, at long ranges, military forces that might deploy or operate within the western Pacific,” the report says.
Beijing’s strategy toward Taiwan, the report says, incorporates “elements of persuasion and coercion” to deter or repress the development of political attitudes in Taiwan favoring independence.
“The PLA has developed and deployed military capabilities to coerce Taiwan or to attempt an invasion if necessary,” it says.
However, Beijing, it adds, appears prepared to defer the use of force as long as it believes that long-term reunification remains possible and the costs of conflict outweigh the benefits.
“The PLA is capable of increasingly sophisticated military action against Taiwan,” the report says.
“Some analysts hold that Beijing would first pursue a measured approach characterized by signaling its readiness to use force, followed by a deliberate buildup of force to optimize the speed of engagement over strategic deception,” it says.
“Others contend that it is more likely that Beijing would sacrifice preparations in favor of surprise to force rapid military and or political resolution before other countries could respond,” the report adds.
As of December last year, the PLA had deployed between 1,050 and 1,150 CSS-6 and CSS-7 short-range ballistic missiles to units opposite Taiwan, and has since upgraded the lethality of this force by introducing variants of these missiles with improved ranges, accuracies and payloads, the report says.
The report says that China bases 490 combat aircraft within unrefueled operational range of Taiwan and has the airfield capacity to expand that number by hundreds.
In addition, the PLA has about 1.25 million personnel in its ground forces, with about 400,000 based opposite Taiwan.
While the report says that US President Barack Obama has agreed to sell Taiwan US$6.4 billion in defensive arms, it makes no mention of Taipei’s request to buy 66 advanced new F-16C/D fighters.
If it did come to attack, the report predicts that China would be unable to enforce a full maritime blockade, although its ability to do so will improve “significantly” over the next five to 10 years.
Beijing might use a variety of disruptive, punitive or lethal military actions, the report speculates, to “induce fear in Taiwan and degrade the populace’s confidence in the Taiwan leadership.”
Or, there could be limited air and missile attacks and precision strikes against air defense systems, again conducted to degrade Taiwan’s defenses, neutralize the Taiwanese leadership and break people’s will to fight.
The report says that a large-scale amphibious invasion is unlikely because it would be a “significant political and military risk.”
However, the PLA is capable of accomplishing various amphibious operations short of a full-scale invasion.
“With few overt military preparations beyond routine training, China could launch an invasion of small Taiwan-held islands, such as the Pratas or Itu Aba. A PLA invasion of a medium-sized, defended offshore island such as Mazu [Matsu] or Jinmen [Kinmen] is within China’s capabilities,” the report says.
“Such an invasion would demonstrate military capability and political resolve, while achieving tangible territorial gain and simultaneously showing some measure of restraint,” it says.
“However, this kind of operation includes significant, if not prohibitive, political risk because it could galvanize the Taiwan populace and generate international opposition,” the report says.
Reacting to the report, the Ministry of National Defense urged the US to sell Taiwan advanced weapons systems.
The comments by ministry spokesman Yu Sy-tue (虞思祖) were a reminder to the Obama administration of its obligation to provide Taiwan with the means to defend itself against a possible Chinese attack.
In his comments to reporters, Yu called on the US to sell Taiwan F-16C/D fighter jets and diesel submarines, two systems that have been at the top of its military wish list for most of this decade.
He also acknowledged that despite Ma’s efforts to improve ties with Beijing: “China has never given up the possibility to use force against Taiwan.”
ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY AP
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or