The National Science Council yesterday said it would stop public infrastructure work at the Central Taiwan Science Park’s Phase 3 Development Zone and would not take applications to establish operations at the zone until it passes an environmental impact assessment by the Environmental Protection Administration (EPA).
The EPA, the council and the science park administration yesterday received a ruling by the Taipei High Administrative Court calling on construction work at the science park to cease.
“Our understanding of the ruling is that it does not apply to manufacturers that are already in the science park,” Central Taiwan Science Park Administration chief executive Yang Wen-ke (楊文科) said. “Therefore, whether or not the manufacturers can continue operating is not an issue.”
That means AU Optronics (友達光電) and Sunner Solar Co (旭能光電) will be able to continue their operations at the phase 3 zone, which is located in Houli Township (后里), Taichung County.
Yang said construction that had already begun at the park’s Phase 4 Development Zone would also stop, as would further development work at the zone.
REFORM
The controversies surrounding the expansion of the Central Taiwan Science Park have prompted academics to propose reforms to the Environmental Assessment Act (環境影響評估法).
Former minister without portfolio Yeh Jiunn-rong (葉俊榮) said Taiwan could follow the US, where a developer is in charge of assessing the environmental impact of its own project. The stakeholders, including the EPA and other government agencies involved, are then required to offer their opinions without any reservation, which are non-binding.
Yeh said that the EPA’s power to decide whether a project could proceed or not should not be rescinded and the government agency in charge of the project should be the one responsible for the environmental impact assessment.
“On the surface, the EPA seems to be able to ‘veto’ a development project through the results of the environmental impact assessment review, but that is not so in reality,” Yeh said. “[As a government agency] the EPA is on its toes to ensure that projects pushed by the Executive Yuan will pass the environmental impact assessment review.”
POLITICAL ISSUE
As a result, “the environmental impact assessment is the main [political] battlefield,” Yeh said. “Under this pressure ... the EPA’s environmental impact assessment has lost its [true] meaning.”
“The US Navy, for example, voluntarily assessed the impact of drilling on the environment. This shows the importance of the developer taking the initiative in minimizing a project’s impact on the environment,” Yeh said.
The proposal, however, has been heavily criticized by environmentalists.
“I have attended many environmental impact assessment meetings and I have noticed that if the project is part of government policy, the government agencies involved usually say ‘no comment’ or simply follow instructions [from above],” lawyer Tsai Ya-hsin (蔡雅欣) said.
“This is what happened with the Central Taiwan Science Park, when [a government agency like] the EPA has the right to ‘veto’ a project. How can I expect the EPA to say something else when it no longer has the right to say no?” he asked.
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
INVESTMENT WATCH: The US activity would not affect the firm’s investment in Taiwan, where 11 production lines would likely be completed this year, C.C. Wei said Investments by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) in the US should not be a cause for concern, but rather seen as the moment that the company and Taiwan stepped into the global spotlight, President William Lai (賴清德) told a news conference at the Presidential Office in Taipei yesterday alongside TSMC chairman and chief executive officer C.C. Wei (魏哲家). Wei and US President Donald Trump in Washington on Monday announced plans to invest US$100 billion in the US to build three advanced foundries, two packaging plants, and a research and development center, after Trump threatened to slap tariffs on chips made
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say
RSS