Judicial Yuan President Lai In-jaw (賴英照) was under fire yesterday amid growing calls for his resignation in the wake of bribery charges against senior judges and a prosecutor.
Earlier this week Lai said he was “enraged” by the case and promised to improve judicial discipline within two months.
The Judicial Reform Foundation yesterday said this was an empty promise as it called for Lai to step down immediately.
“I can’t believe that one of the detained judges is a member of the Judicial Yuan’s ‘disciplinary committee’ and ‘personnel affairs evaluation board.’ How can a person like this evaluate his coworkers?” Judicial Reform Foundation secretary-general Lin Feng-jeng (林峰正) said at a press conference.
Lin was referring to Taiwan High Court Judge Chen Jung-ho (陳榮和), who was detained on Wednesday along with High Court judges Lee Chun-ti (李春地) and Tsai Kuang-chih (蔡光治) and Banciao Prosecutor Chiu Mao-jung (邱茂榮) for allegedly accepting bribes from former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Miaoli County commissioner Ho Chih-hui (何智輝) in exchange for a not guilty verdict in a property case.
The foundation said Lai should establish an evaluation system — administered by a neutral party, not the Judicial Yuan — for judges to weed out the unqualified ones.
Huang Lin-lun (黃麟倫), deputy director of the Judicial Yuan’s Administration Department, attended the press conference, but dismissed criticism that the Judicial Yuan has been lax in pushing for judicial reform.
The Judicial Yuan has been studying the possibility of an independent review system for judges, Huang said.
When asked at a separate setting if Lai should resign, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said he could not comment because the corruption allegations against the judges and prosecutor are still being investigated.
However, he vowed to crack down on corruption, broaching the idea of making the UN Convention Against Corruption into law. He said he had already asked the Ministry of Justice to look into the matter.
It was deeply distressing to find out four judges allegedly took bribes, but feeling distressed was not enough, Ma said. Concrete steps had to be taken, he said.
He said it was important to put into practice the proposals made during a judicial reform forum 11 years ago, including enacting a law on judges. Such legislation was important because prosecutors and judges would be evaluated and they could be fired if they did not meet the necessary standards, he said.
“I always believe before you demand that somebody do something right, you must set a good example and never be afraid of disclosing family scandals,” he said. “Once government corruption is uncovered, we must take the initiative to investigate, deal with it in a lucid and speedy manner, cooperate with the investigation and explain to the public.”
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or