While the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) will have modest global economic effects, the geo-economic implications are significant enough to demand strategic attention from the US, two US international economists said in a recent study.
Daniel Rosen and Zhi Wang of the Washington-based Peterson Institute for International Economics wrote that the ECFA underscores the importance of securing US economic engagement of the first order in Asia.
“The economic cooperation framework agreement with China will fundamentally change the game between Taiwan and China and hence affect the regional economy and even the transpacific tempo for the US,” they said in the report, Deepening China-Taiwan Relations Through the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement.
US engagement in Asian economic integration is important, they wrote, and Taipei and Washington could add to the balance in geoeconomic momentum centered on China by reinvigorating their trade and investment framework agreement (TIFA) talks, and by considering other opportunities for transpacific bridge-building that includes the US.
Taiwan’s experience in negotiating serious trade liberalization is more limited than most other Asian economies, and Beijing’s political motives may lead it to restrain its trade negotiators from pushing for maximum benefits in ECFA talks, they said.
If Taiwan wants to capitalize on the ECFA to build more economic links, it will need to quickly develop its negotiating skills and then ratify and implement its external commitments at home, Rosen and Zhi wrote.
The political challenges that Taiwan’s leaders face at home should be good news, they wrote, because it is a common aspect of more advanced democracies and such political challenges are something Beijing’s officials are not constrained by.
By implementing an ECFA along the lines of the China-ASEAN agreement, Taiwan would increase its 2020 GDP by about 4.5 percent, or US$21 billion, they wrote.
However, they also concluded that other agreements in the region will be negotiated that will impose costs on Taiwan.
“So the net effect of ECFA for Taiwan would be some 5.3 percent improvement in GDP by 2020,” they wrote. “We also argue that this is a conservative projection.”
The net results of the ECFA are positive for China, but not so much for Taiwan in value terms and as a share of GDP, they wrote. For other economies in the region, they said, the impact of ECFA will be modest, while in some cases positive.
In the case of the US, they said their model shows a modest positive result from ECFA, thought statistically marginal. However, a more negative impact will emerge as the scenarios incorporating further Asian economic integration unfold, they wrote.
As for Taiwan reaching similar agreements with other economies without interference from China, the pair said it was time for China to set aside its anxieties.
Other trade pacts would benefit Taiwan, but the cross-strait gains are so disproportionately large that the bulk of gains available to Taiwan from regional trade liberalization would be locked in regardless of whether it resolves the impediments to do free trade agreements with other economies, they wrote.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS