The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus yesterday withdrew from the provisional legislative session called to review the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) with Beijing after the legislature ruled to allow the agreement to skip a committee review.
DPP legislators chanted “democracy has already died, the public needs to save Taiwan” as they walked off the legislative floor after Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers voted down their own caucus’ proposal to reconsider Thursday’s decision.
PHOTO: SAM YEH, AFP
The KMT caucus’ move yesterday was part of its strategy to push the ECFA through the one-month negotiation period, and thereby prevent the DPP caucus, which alleged Thursday’s procedure was flawed, from filing a reconsideration proposal of Thursday’s ruling later. If the DPP caucus filed a reconsideration proposal, it would have changed the end date of the one-month period.
Legislative procedures allow any bill or proposal referred to cross-party negotiation to be put on hold for up to one month. As the result of the KMT caucus' move yesterday, it means the earliest the legislature could pass the ECFA is Aug. 8, when the one-month period ends.
On Thursday, despite lawmakers throwing objects, splashing water, pushing and shoving, Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) announced he would adopt the KMT caucus’ motion to allow the ECFA and a cross-strait copyright protection agreement to skip the preliminary review.
The DPP caucus later challenged Wang’s announcement, with DPP Secretary-General Lee Chun-yee (李俊毅) saying the speaker had failed to call for a vote even though the DPP caucus voiced opposition to the KMT caucus’ motion.
Wang stood by his decision when asked for comment yesterday.
“As the speaker standing on the podium, I did not hear anyone express his or her opposition [to the motion]. [In fact], I could not hear anything at all because of the chaos in front of me,” Wang said. “If I had heard something, I would have dealt with [the opposition] in accordance with legislative procedures.”
DPP Legislator Chai Trong-rong (蔡同榮) said that the DPP caucus’ boycott occured because the two sides could not reach common ground on the review of the ECFA.
The DPP caucus wants a clause-by-clause review of the agreement with votes on every single article while the KMT caucus wants a single vote for the entire ECFA package.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said earlier in the week that an individual review was unnecessary and would compromise Taiwan’s ability to negotiate free-trade agreements with other countries.
Chai said Ma’s comments showed the legislature has already lost its autonomy. He said the legislative process had been interrupted by Ma.
“The rest of the session will be the KMT’s one-party show,” Lee said.
The provisional legislative session is scheduled to run till Wednesday.
The DPP will continue to supervise relevant developments from outside the legislative system, he said, meaning through civic groups, public opinions and possibly demonstrations.
While KMT caucus secretary--general Lin Tsang-min (林滄敏) accused the DPP of “lying” about its promise to be the gatekeeper for the public during the ECFA review, the DPP caucus said its decision to boycott was done with the full support of DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文).
Newly elected DPP caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) said that if the trade pact was reviewed as a package, it would set a -dangerous precedent for future cross-strait agreements because lawmakers would lose their authority to alter the content of such deals.
Tsai told reporters she was concerned that the review would not address many of the public concerns that have been raised over the agreement.
“The attitude by the KMT doesn’t leave any room for the concerns of either the opposition party or members of the public worried about the ECFA,” she said.
Thursday’s brawl was regrettable, she said, but it occurred because DPP lawmakers were not able to “reasonablely discuss and review” the trade agreement because of the government’s interference.
The DPP caucus is expected to spend their time away from the provisional session in town hall meetings nationwide.
The meetings are expected to focus on the ECFA’s potential impact on Taiwan.
DPP lawmakers say the trade pact will impact the unemployment rate and damage fragile industries through an influx of cheaper Chinese goods. The KMT government says that claim has been blown out of proportion.
At a separate setting yesterday, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called for a “gentleman movement” in the legislature.
He expressed regret over Thursday’s clash, and urged legislators to exercise self-restraint on the legislative floor.
“Maybe we should promote the gentleman movement in the legislature, and help our legislators act more maturely, so that the legislative matters will run more smoothly,” Ma said.
Presidential Office Spokesman Lo Chih-chiang (羅智強) condemned the DPP for using violence in the legislative session, and urged Tsai to review the behavior of her party’s lawmakers.
“Tsai has repeatedly pledged to rationally oversee the government’s performance, and it is time to stop using violence. We hope Tsai will take the necessary actions against party members who cause violence,” he said.
ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY MO YAN-CHIH
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say