Taipei and Beijing wrapped up the final round of negotiations on an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) yesterday, with Taiwan including more than 500 items on its “early harvest” list and China about 250.
The early harvest list refers to goods and services that will be subject to immediate tariff concessions or exemptions, which are expected to form the backbone of the proposed deal.
The pact constitutes an early harvest list in traded goods and another in trade in services. Detailed items were not released yesterday, but both sides promised to make them public as soon as the trade pact is signed next week.
PHOTO: REUTERS
On traded goods, there are 539 items in Taiwan’s early harvest list, with an estimated value of US$13.8 billion. They take up 16 percent of the China-bound export volume and cover six categories.
China will have 267 items in its early harvest list, accounting for US$2.86 billion, or 10.5 percent, of its Taiwan-bound exports. It covers five categories including upstream raw materials such as petrochemicals and synthetics.
China agreed not to export more agricultural products or workers to Taiwan. It also agreed to do its best to spare 17 Taiwanese businesses categories listed as “disadvantaged.”
While some were concerned the promise would be short-lived, Deputy Chairman of China’s Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS) Zheng Lizhong (鄭立中) said “Taiwanese compatriots” should rest assured that they would keep their promise.
He also dismissed speculation that Chinese businesses complained about the “unbalanced” early harvest program, saying they were willing to do so because both sides are “a family.”
Some petrochemical products Taiwan wished to place on the list, such as PE and PVC, did not make it to the list, but both sides agreed to resume negotiations within six months after the trade pact takes effect so each side can open their individual market “as soon as possible.”
However, the pact did not specify when or how much both sides should open their markets. Nevertheless, the trade pact would specify “substantial trade” liberalization, Taiwan’s Bureau of Foreign Trade Director-General Huang Chih-peng (黃志鵬) said.
Early harvest items that will enjoy immediate zero tariffs are those with 5 percent tariffs and less. Products with tariffs between 5 percent and 15 percent will have the rate reduced to 5 percent the first year and zero the next year. Those with tariffs higher than 15 percent will see it decreased to 10 percent the first year, 5 percent the second year and zero the following year.
On trade in services, there are 11 business categories on Taiwan’s early harvest list, including financial industry and non-financial services.
On the financial industries, Taiwanese banks that have set up branches in China for a year and made profit for one year will be allowed to provide services in the yuan. Taiwanese banks will enjoy speedy approval of their applications if they opt to upgrade their representative offices into branches in western and eastern China.
Taiwanese insurance companies can establish insurance firms in China if the group or joint venture has capital of more than US$5 billion, operate for 30 years and establish an office in China for two years.
Asked by media whether China would ask Taiwan to pay back its “economic favor,” Zheng said they never thought about it and that it was not an issue.
“Since we already made the offer, there is no such thing as asking it back,” he said. “We are a family. Please don’t worry.”
Zheng said they would “never change the policy toward Taiwanese compatriots,” adding that if there was anything they wanted in return, it would be to jointly “upgrade the economic competitiveness of the Chinese nation in the world.”
While the pact contains a termination article, Huang said it was a defensive mechanism “put aside for possible use in the future.” Should such a scenario arise, both sides would try to resolve the problem with negotiation before resorting to the final solution, he said.
Zheng was evasive about whether China would block other countries from signing free-trade agreements (FTA) with Taiwan after an ECFA is signed, saying the matter would be “properly addressed.”
Huang said he did not ask China to refrain from blocking other countries from FTAs with Taiwan during the negotiation process, but added he “knew in his heart” that both Taiwan and China have the right to sign FTAs with other WTO members and that Taiwan had the economic power to do so.
Outside the Grand Hotel where the meeting was held, fears that dozens of people would protest later proved unfounded.
Shortly after 10am, only one Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Taipei City councilor candidate and an assistant had appeared.
Driving in a campaign vehicle, the pair were immediately met by police at the road entrance to the hotel and turned away, only to arrive again in a taxi that took them straight to the main gates of the luxury hotel.
The candidate, Tung Chung-yan (童仲彥), and an assistant from another DPP candidate’s campaign office attempted to persuade police that they were going to the hotel to buy a cup of coffee.
“Why can’t we head to the hotel? Is [Taiwan] under martial law? Why are we prevented from going up the mountain?” Tung asked.
Joining their protest shortly after were four members of the pro-independence Taiwan Nation campaign who held an impromptu press conference at the gates to the hotel after being told by police that they wouldn’t be able to enter the venue.
Taiwan Nation chairman Peter Wang (王獻極) said the government had exaggerated the benefits of the trade pact, which would lower cross-strait tariffs and did not take into account Beijing’s political ambitions toward Taiwan.
He deployed anti-ECFA banners on the ground in front of the gate and laid a Chinese flag on the ground. Popping a large balloon on top of the flag, he said it represented his intention to “pop” what he alleged to be the government’s lies.
No scuffles took place at the scene yesterday. All six protesters later departed after meeting police representatives. Traffic heading to the hotel, a popular destination for Chinese tourists, was not affected.
At a separate setting yesterday, Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) lauded the results of the negotiations, saying the early harvest list would benefit the nation.
However, Wang said the ECFA would not be really beneficial to Taiwan unless it continues to enjoy as many benefits as the initial early harvest lists show during the cross-strait negotiation scheduled to take place six months after the ECFA is inked.
Wang said he expected to call a meeting on July 5 with the three legislative caucuses to decide how to review the ECFA during the planned extra legislative session if the trade pact is signed on Tuesday, as planned.
Later yesterday behind closed doors, Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) and Cabinet officials briefed the speaker on the negotiations.
On his way to the briefing, Wu said Taiwan did not entirely get what it wanted and should make extra efforts in future negotiations.
“My greatest comfort is we’ve managed to defend what is more important — no additional [Chinese] agricultural products will be allowed to enter Taiwan and no [Chinese] laborers can work in Taiwan,” he said.
Also See: EDITORIAL : How healthy will ECFA be?
Also See: SEF says ECFA to be signed on June 29
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS