By Doug Young
REUTERS, HONG KONG
Google’s gambit in pulling the plug on its flagship search engine in China leaves its remaining operations there exposed to the whimsy of Beijing, whose initial reaction is far from reassuring.
Google plans to maintain an advertising sales force as well as its large research and development operations in China, but risks losing market share, revenue and staff to rivals including market leader Baidu, up-and-comer Tencent and US heavyweight Microsoft.
Opportunities to develop and market its Android and Chrome operating systems for cellphones and PCs in China could also be threatened, a potential setback for partners such as handset makers Dell and Lenovo.
“There’s no doubt the Chinese might make life difficult for Google,” said Vivek Couto, an analyst at Media Partners Asia. “But they don’t want to go directly after them. China also has to be a bit cautious.”
Google’s decision to shut its Chinese portal and reroute searches to its Hong Kong-based site to avoid the self-censorship Beijing demands was seen more as an escalation than a compromise in the two-month old dispute.
Though tensions could ease after an initial round of finger-pointing, the uncertainty and need for Beijing’s tolerance, if not support, threaten Google’s prospects in the world’s largest Internet market.
Initial indications that Google’s gambit was getting a chilly reception came from the official Xinhua news agency, which cited an unnamed official calling the move “totally wrong” and in violation of Google’s written promises.
In direct terms, Google may have to give up some or all of its revenue derived from China’s search market, depending on whether its advertisers follow it to its redirected China site at google.com.hk.
Analyst estimates of Google’s annual revenue in China range from US$300 million to roughly US$600 million, a small portion of its US$24 billion in annual revenue.
Other stakeholders exposed to Google’s actions include cellphone makers like Dell and Lenovo, which are both developing Android-based phones for China, as well as the hundreds of people who independently sell ads and develop software for Google’s products.
Spokeswomen at Lenovo and China Mobile, which is planning to offer the Dell Android phones on its network, had no immediate comment.
Meanwhile, other search sites operators stand ready to benefit most form Google’s withdrawal, most notably Baidu — which has 60 percent of China’s search market — and others such as fast-growing Tencent, analysts said.
“It will benefit everybody in China, but the obvious immediate beneficiary will be Baidu,” said CLSA analyst Elinor Leung (梁向奕). Microsoft, which has launched a beta version of its Bing search site in China, could also pick up market share, she added.
Other Web players could benefit as well if Google decides to use them as a back-door strategy to invest in China’s Internet market. Yahoo used a similar strategy after abandoning its own efforts in China in favor of buying 40 percent of leading China e-commerce operator Alibaba Group.
Despite the potential for collateral damage, observers and those who work for Google were cautiously optimistic that the current conflict wouldn’t spiral out of control, saying such escalation was in no one’s interest.
Google’s interest in the market is already clear.
But China also has an interest in placating Western governments that have been critical of its heavy-handed approach to media control and civil rights. China also needs major global tech firms like Google to develop its own domestic industries so they can someday compete on the global stage.
“If Google leaves its R&D unit in its current headquarters in Beijing ... the staff will remain, so I think our activities will continue,” said Arthur Wang (王開源), chairman of Beijing Google Technology User Group, one of Google’s largest software development groups.
Advertisers could take a more cautious approach until they see if traffic to Google’s Hong Kong site catering to mainland Chinese Web surfers gets the same traffic as its shuttered China site, said Kaiser Kuo (郭怡廣), a China-based technology commentator.
“Buying on a redirected site that could be at any moment blocked is a risky strategy,” he said. “So I think people are going to read the tea leaves and see what the government is going to do in this situation before making any commitments.”
Edward Yu (于揚), an analyst at China research firm Analysys, was confident Google could continue to operate effectively in China.
“In the short term, some officials may be upset about Google rerouting its operations,” he said. “But when things cool down, I think the other part of their operations are not affected as long as they comply with the regulations,” he said.
ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY MELANIE LEE, MICHAEL WEI AND KEVIN SOH
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS