By Doug Young
REUTERS, HONG KONG
Google’s gambit in pulling the plug on its flagship search engine in China leaves its remaining operations there exposed to the whimsy of Beijing, whose initial reaction is far from reassuring.
Google plans to maintain an advertising sales force as well as its large research and development operations in China, but risks losing market share, revenue and staff to rivals including market leader Baidu, up-and-comer Tencent and US heavyweight Microsoft.
Opportunities to develop and market its Android and Chrome operating systems for cellphones and PCs in China could also be threatened, a potential setback for partners such as handset makers Dell and Lenovo.
“There’s no doubt the Chinese might make life difficult for Google,” said Vivek Couto, an analyst at Media Partners Asia. “But they don’t want to go directly after them. China also has to be a bit cautious.”
Google’s decision to shut its Chinese portal and reroute searches to its Hong Kong-based site to avoid the self-censorship Beijing demands was seen more as an escalation than a compromise in the two-month old dispute.
Though tensions could ease after an initial round of finger-pointing, the uncertainty and need for Beijing’s tolerance, if not support, threaten Google’s prospects in the world’s largest Internet market.
Initial indications that Google’s gambit was getting a chilly reception came from the official Xinhua news agency, which cited an unnamed official calling the move “totally wrong” and in violation of Google’s written promises.
In direct terms, Google may have to give up some or all of its revenue derived from China’s search market, depending on whether its advertisers follow it to its redirected China site at google.com.hk.
Analyst estimates of Google’s annual revenue in China range from US$300 million to roughly US$600 million, a small portion of its US$24 billion in annual revenue.
Other stakeholders exposed to Google’s actions include cellphone makers like Dell and Lenovo, which are both developing Android-based phones for China, as well as the hundreds of people who independently sell ads and develop software for Google’s products.
Spokeswomen at Lenovo and China Mobile, which is planning to offer the Dell Android phones on its network, had no immediate comment.
Meanwhile, other search sites operators stand ready to benefit most form Google’s withdrawal, most notably Baidu — which has 60 percent of China’s search market — and others such as fast-growing Tencent, analysts said.
“It will benefit everybody in China, but the obvious immediate beneficiary will be Baidu,” said CLSA analyst Elinor Leung (梁向奕). Microsoft, which has launched a beta version of its Bing search site in China, could also pick up market share, she added.
Other Web players could benefit as well if Google decides to use them as a back-door strategy to invest in China’s Internet market. Yahoo used a similar strategy after abandoning its own efforts in China in favor of buying 40 percent of leading China e-commerce operator Alibaba Group.
Despite the potential for collateral damage, observers and those who work for Google were cautiously optimistic that the current conflict wouldn’t spiral out of control, saying such escalation was in no one’s interest.
Google’s interest in the market is already clear.
But China also has an interest in placating Western governments that have been critical of its heavy-handed approach to media control and civil rights. China also needs major global tech firms like Google to develop its own domestic industries so they can someday compete on the global stage.
“If Google leaves its R&D unit in its current headquarters in Beijing ... the staff will remain, so I think our activities will continue,” said Arthur Wang (王開源), chairman of Beijing Google Technology User Group, one of Google’s largest software development groups.
Advertisers could take a more cautious approach until they see if traffic to Google’s Hong Kong site catering to mainland Chinese Web surfers gets the same traffic as its shuttered China site, said Kaiser Kuo (郭怡廣), a China-based technology commentator.
“Buying on a redirected site that could be at any moment blocked is a risky strategy,” he said. “So I think people are going to read the tea leaves and see what the government is going to do in this situation before making any commitments.”
Edward Yu (于揚), an analyst at China research firm Analysys, was confident Google could continue to operate effectively in China.
“In the short term, some officials may be upset about Google rerouting its operations,” he said. “But when things cool down, I think the other part of their operations are not affected as long as they comply with the regulations,” he said.
ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY MELANIE LEE, MICHAEL WEI AND KEVIN SOH
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS