Former diplomat and trade expert Benjamin Lu (魯肇忠) is calling on the Ma administration to clearly explain and reveal all details of a proposed economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China before developing the pact any further with Beijing.
“People in Taiwan are very much concerned about an ECFA, but strangely the government is keeping them in the dark,” he said during an interview in Washington, where he is currently visiting family.
“It is very unusual,” Lu added. “They are not releasing details of their talks with Beijing. They are keeping things secret and that is making people [feel it is] very dubious.”
A specialist in international trade policy, Lu served as deputy director of the Bureau of Foreign Trade in the Ministry of Economic Affairs, and in the late 1980s and early 1990s he was one of Taiwan’s top diplomats, serving as representative in the UK, the US and in Belgium.
“I certainly don’t believe that the proposed ECFA will provide any opportunity for Taiwan to increase its exports to the PRC [People’s Republic of China],” he said. “The reason is that what we can manufacture in Taiwan can be manufactured in mainland China at a much cheaper price. We have no competitive edge at all, even with the concession of a tariff provided by ECFA, if there is any. There is a slight chance for Taiwan to export more tropical fruit to mainland China and some semi-finished products.”
Lu spoke out in the aftermath of a statement from President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) office dismissing criticism from former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and retired US diplomat John Tkacik, who both said they believed an ECFA would undermine Taiwan’s competitiveness.
The statement said that Tkacik had been “misleading” and offered to “explain” the trade pact to Lee, hinting that he had failed to understand it.
Lu, on the other hand, said that he agreed with Tkacik and Lee, and that both men deserved to be treated with respect and have their concerns properly answered.
“As a result of [an] ECFA, a lot of other products, including agricultural products, will be sold from mainland China to Taiwan and that will definitely hurt the domestic economy,” Lu said.
“I am also skeptical that the proposed pact will pave the way to other free-trade agreements. I believe that a certain kind of political maneuver will be exercised to put up obstacles to the enforcement of the pact,” he added.
The only positive point that Lu could see to an ECFA was the protection it might provide to Taiwanese investment in China, but to what extent that protection would be implemented remained to be seen.
“It’s easy talking, but doing is something else,” he said.
Lu added that he “totally agreed” with Tkacik that an ECFA would marginalize the Taiwanese economy.
“I think Ma’s government is pretty stubborn,” he said. “They don’t care about the concerns of the people. We need to have all of the details of the talks. They must not continue to keep them secret.”
Also See: Beijing’s intentions for ECFA very clear
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or