President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) yesterday visited Chiayi County to promote the government’s proposed economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) to local farmers, promising to defend the rights of farmers and laborers.
Speaking in Taiwanese, Ma said officials from the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) and the Ministry of Economic Affairs had visited many cities and counties to explain the importance of ECFA to the people, and the government would strive to help the public gain a better understanding of what an ECFA is.
“We understand that many people are concerned about the ECFA. The government will keep the promise of not opening Taiwan to more Chinese agricultural products,” Ma said yesterday.
Vice President Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) and Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) will make frequent visits to southern Taiwan to explain the ECFA using Taiwanese, he said.
Ma stressed the importance of signing an ECFA with China, Taiwan’s biggest trading partner, and said the government expects that once an ECFA is signed, barriers to Taiwan’s efforts to sign free trade agreements with ASEAN countries would be reduced.
In response to Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) reservations about the government signing an ECFA, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) yesterday challenged Tsai about her opposition to setting up a cross-strait task force in the legislature when she served as MAC chairwoman.
“If the DPP opposes the ECFA, please present an alternative solution to the nation’s isolation from regional economic integration,” KMT Spokesman Lee Chien-jung (李建榮) said.
Meanwhile, Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) yesterday repeated his support for the establishment of a task force on cross-strait affairs in the legislature to monitor cross-strait policies and react to changes in the situation.
“As cross-strait interaction is well underway, no single legislative committee can handle all the issues alone. These concern almost all the legislature’s eight committees. In view of this, it’s necessary to establish a cross-strait task force,” Wang said.
“At the moment, the legislature should actively participate [before a cross-strait policy is made] and in its oversight afterwards,” he said.
Wang made the remarks after an inter-party negotiation session on the DPP caucus’ request to set up a task force.
Responding to media reports that Ma opposed the proposal, Wang said that he hadn’t heard that from the president.
During the inter-party negotiations, DPP caucus whips and their KMT counterparts failed to resolve their differences on the task force proposal.
KMT and DPP caucus representatives agreed that the task force, if it is to be set up, should serve as a platform for communication between the executive branch and the legislative branch, but they were at odds over whether it would be able to make binding resolutions.
DPP caucus whip Chen Ying (陳瑩) said the party would draw an outline for establishing the task force as a basis for discussion with the KMT in the next round of inter-party negotiations.
KMT caucus whip Lin Hong-chi (林鴻池) said the caucus needed to clarify doubts surrounding the establishment of the task force.
“If the executive branch needs to consult with the task force before a policy is made, there is the possibility of the legislature infringing on executive power. Furthermore, if the task force is able to make binding resolutions, conflicts of authority may arise between the task force and the legislature’s statutory committees,” Lin said.
DPP legislator Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) said that the party caucus opposed the idea touted by the KMT of holding a plenary legislative session to monitor cross-strait negotiations.
Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) Chairman Chiang Pin-kung (江丙坤) had failed to report to the legislative plenary session on each occasion before cross-strait talks, and the economic treaties inked during the talks were enacted without legislative approval, so legislative plenary sessions were clearly insufficient to monitor the policies, Ker said.
He accused the KMT caucus of refusing to form a task force to effectively monitor cross-strait policies but confusing the matter by holding a plenary session.
In related news, the Presidential Office on Tuesday commented on why foreign media had not been allowed to attend a briefing by Ma on the ECFA.
In an e-mail to the Taipei Times, Taiwan Foreign Correspondents’ Club (TFCC) president Robin Kwong (鄺彥暉) said that after receiving a complaint letter from the TFCC, the Presidential Office told him that the meeting was intended as a “gathering between the president and the local journalists’ association” and was not a press event.
“It was therefore not open to not just foreign media, but also local media who were not members of the journalists’ association,” Kwong said.
As a last-minute solution, foreign media were allowed to watch the event on a video link at the Presidential Office press room.
Kwong said the Presidential Office was focusing on improving its communication on ECFA-related matters with the domestic audience after being criticized for its handling of the US beef issue in recent months.
“If the president [is] going to talk about an issue as important as [an] ECFA, then it is no longer just a social gathering,” Kwong told the Presidential Office, adding that the TFCC was “especially concerned” because Tuesday’s briefing was not just a one-off event, but a regular monthly briefing.
“The Presidential Office’s response was that they would not change the arrangements for yesterday [Tuesday], but that President Ma would hold a similar briefing with the TFCC in early April,” Kwong said.
ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY RICH CHANG
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or