The Ministry of Finance yesterday said the breakdown of cross-strait negotiations on a tax pact on Monday was mainly the result of a dispute over levying income tax on China-based Taiwanese businesspeople according to where they reside or where they get paid.
The ministry said the breakdown was not related to sovereignty, apparently contradicting comments a day earlier by Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義), who said the deal was delayed because the treaty would have treated Taiwan the same as Hong Kong.
In a statement yesterday, the ministry said the two sides had engaged in several rounds of talks on the deal since October.
photo: AFP
“The two sides took a cautious approach and reached a basic consensus,” it said. “The mainland authorities later had other considerations on several technical issues. After further negotiations, the two sides failed to reach an agreement.”
Both sides have dismissed speculation that the failure was related to sovereignty.
But Wu told reporters at National Taiwan University Hospital’s International Convention Center on Tuesday that the reason the deal fell through was that Beijing asked Taiwan to follow similar deals it had with Hong Kong that levy income tax in the country where the income is earned.
Wu said China proposed the “source-based taxation” regime, backing away from the planned “residence-based” regime.
“Suddenly there were dissenting opinions on the Chinese side, suggesting [that Taiwan and China] sign the tax pact following the Hong Kong model — but the status of Taiwan is different from that of Hong Kong,” Wu said.
Wu said the government would hold out on the deal until the Chinese side agrees to residence-based taxation.
The agreement was intended to prevent double taxation in Taiwan and China of income earned by Taiwanese businesses based in China.
However, it had raised concerns from businesspeople, who feared that China would gain access to tax information to make unfounded tax evasion claims they say officials sometimes use to harass foreign businesses.
But Wu said any deal would not put China-based Taiwanese businesspeople at risk.
“There will not be a problem with tax inspections as long as they pay tax in accordance with regulations,” Wu said.
Chien Yao-tang (簡耀堂), a member of the pro-independence Taiwan Thinktank, said the tax deal would have caused more harm than good.
The deal would have increased the tax burden on businesspeople and limited their options to legally minimize their tax payments, Chien said.
Most China-based Taiwanese businesspeople do not have problems with tax investigations currently, Chien said.
The two sides signed three agreements on Tuesday covering the fishing industry, quality checks of agricultural products, and standardizing inspections and certification.
The Bureau of Standards, Metrology and Inspection yesterday dismissed speculation that the last of these would pave the way for a “one-China market.”
Nor would the pact on inspection of agricultural products denigrate sovereignty or open the door to an influx of Chinese produce, the Council of Agriculture said in a statement yesterday.
The administration will not drop its ban on 830 agricultural products from China, while the agreement will expedite inspections of Taiwanese products and maintain inspection standards, it said.
The council also dismissed reports claiming that the agreement would lift the ban on hairy crabs from China, at the same time noting that imports of hairy crabs were allowed in 2001 when the previous administration was in power.
Future imports would need to meet national safety requirements for seafood, the council said.
Seventy percent of middle and elementary schools now conduct English classes entirely in English, the Ministry of Education said, as it encourages schools nationwide to adopt this practice Minister of Education (MOE) Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) is scheduled to present a report on the government’s bilingual education policy to the Legislative Yuan’s Education and Culture Committee today. The report would outline strategies aimed at expanding access to education, reducing regional disparities and improving talent cultivation. Implementation of bilingual education policies has varied across local governments, occasionally drawing public criticism. For example, some schools have required teachers of non-English subjects to pass English proficiency
‘FORM OF PROTEST’: The German Institute Taipei said it was ‘shocked’ to see Nazi symbolism used in connection with political aims as it condemned the incident Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), who led efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), was released on bail of NT$80,000 yesterday amid an outcry over a Nazi armband he wore to questioning the night before. Sung arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office for questioning in a recall petition forgery case on Tuesday night wearing a red armband bearing a swastika, carrying a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf and giving a Nazi salute. Sung left the building at 1:15am without the armband and apparently covering the book with a coat. This is a serious international scandal and Chinese
TRADE: The premier pledged safeguards on ‘Made in Taiwan’ labeling, anti-dumping measures and stricter export controls to strengthen its position in trade talks Products labeled “made in Taiwan” must be genuinely made in Taiwan, Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) said yesterday, vowing to enforce strict safeguards against “origin laundering” and initiate anti-dumping investigations to prevent China dumping its products in Taiwan. Cho made the remarks in a discussion session with representatives from industries in Kaohsiung. In response to the US government’s recent announcement of “reciprocal” tariffs on its trading partners, President William Lai (賴清德) and Cho last week began a series of consultations with industry leaders nationwide to gather feedback and address concerns. Taiwanese and US officials held a videoconference on Friday evening to discuss the
PERSONAL DATA: The implicated KMT members allegedly compiled their petitions by copying names from party lists without the consent of the people concerned Judicial authorities searched six locations yesterday and questioned six people, including one elderly Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) member and five KMT Youth League associates, about alleged signature forgery and fraud relating to their recall efforts against two Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators. After launching a probe into alleged signature forgery and related fraud in the KMT’s recall effort, prosecutors received a number of complaints, including about one petition that had 1,748 signatures of voters whose family members said they had already passed away, and also voters who said they did not approve the use of their name, Taipei Deputy Chief Prosecutor
RSS