The Ministry of Finance yesterday said the breakdown of cross-strait negotiations on a tax pact on Monday was mainly the result of a dispute over levying income tax on China-based Taiwanese businesspeople according to where they reside or where they get paid.
The ministry said the breakdown was not related to sovereignty, apparently contradicting comments a day earlier by Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義), who said the deal was delayed because the treaty would have treated Taiwan the same as Hong Kong.
In a statement yesterday, the ministry said the two sides had engaged in several rounds of talks on the deal since October.
photo: AFP
“The two sides took a cautious approach and reached a basic consensus,” it said. “The mainland authorities later had other considerations on several technical issues. After further negotiations, the two sides failed to reach an agreement.”
Both sides have dismissed speculation that the failure was related to sovereignty.
But Wu told reporters at National Taiwan University Hospital’s International Convention Center on Tuesday that the reason the deal fell through was that Beijing asked Taiwan to follow similar deals it had with Hong Kong that levy income tax in the country where the income is earned.
Wu said China proposed the “source-based taxation” regime, backing away from the planned “residence-based” regime.
“Suddenly there were dissenting opinions on the Chinese side, suggesting [that Taiwan and China] sign the tax pact following the Hong Kong model — but the status of Taiwan is different from that of Hong Kong,” Wu said.
Wu said the government would hold out on the deal until the Chinese side agrees to residence-based taxation.
The agreement was intended to prevent double taxation in Taiwan and China of income earned by Taiwanese businesses based in China.
However, it had raised concerns from businesspeople, who feared that China would gain access to tax information to make unfounded tax evasion claims they say officials sometimes use to harass foreign businesses.
But Wu said any deal would not put China-based Taiwanese businesspeople at risk.
“There will not be a problem with tax inspections as long as they pay tax in accordance with regulations,” Wu said.
Chien Yao-tang (簡耀堂), a member of the pro-independence Taiwan Thinktank, said the tax deal would have caused more harm than good.
The deal would have increased the tax burden on businesspeople and limited their options to legally minimize their tax payments, Chien said.
Most China-based Taiwanese businesspeople do not have problems with tax investigations currently, Chien said.
The two sides signed three agreements on Tuesday covering the fishing industry, quality checks of agricultural products, and standardizing inspections and certification.
The Bureau of Standards, Metrology and Inspection yesterday dismissed speculation that the last of these would pave the way for a “one-China market.”
Nor would the pact on inspection of agricultural products denigrate sovereignty or open the door to an influx of Chinese produce, the Council of Agriculture said in a statement yesterday.
The administration will not drop its ban on 830 agricultural products from China, while the agreement will expedite inspections of Taiwanese products and maintain inspection standards, it said.
The council also dismissed reports claiming that the agreement would lift the ban on hairy crabs from China, at the same time noting that imports of hairy crabs were allowed in 2001 when the previous administration was in power.
Future imports would need to meet national safety requirements for seafood, the council said.
GEARING UP: An invasion would be difficult and would strain China’s forces, but it has conducted large-scale training supporting an invasion scenario, the report said China increased its military pressure on Taiwan last year and took other steps in preparation for a potential invasion, an annual report published by the US Department of Defense on Wednesday showed. “Throughout 2023, Beijing continued to erode longstanding norms in and around Taiwan by employing a range of pressure tactics against Taiwan,” the report said, which is titled “Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China (PRC) 2024.” The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) “is preparing for a contingency to unify Taiwan with the PRC by force, if perceived as necessary by Beijing, while simultaneously deterring, delaying or denying
PEACEFUL RESOLUTION: A statement issued following a meeting between Australia and Britain reiterated support for Taiwan and opposition to change in the Taiwan Strait Canada should support the peaceful resolution of Taiwan’s destiny according to the will of Taiwanese, Canadian lawmakers said in a resolution marking the second anniversary of that nation’s Indo-Pacific strategy on Monday. The Canadian House of Commons committee on Canada-Chinese relations made the comment as part of 34 recommendations for the new edition of the strategy, adding that Ottawa should back Taiwan’s meaningful participation in international organizations. Canada’s Indo-Pacific Strategy, first published in October 2022, emphasized that the region’s security, trade, human rights, democracy and environmental protection would play a crucial role in shaping Canada’s future. The strategy called for Canada to deepen
TECH CONFERENCE: Input from industry and academic experts can contribute to future policymaking across government agencies, President William Lai said Multifunctional service robots could be the next new area in which Taiwan could play a significant role, given its strengths in chip manufacturing and software design, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) chairman and chief executive C.C. Wei (魏哲家) said yesterday. “In the past two months, our customers shared a lot of their future plans with me. Artificial intelligence [AI] and AI applications were the most talked about subjects in our conversation,” Wei said in a speech at the National Science and Technology Conference in Taipei. TSMC, the world’s biggest contract chipmaker, counts Nvidia Corp, Advanced Micro Devices Inc, Apple Inc and
QUICK LOOK: The amendments include stricter recall requirements and Constitutional Court procedures, as well as a big increase in local governments’ budgets Portions of controversial amendments to tighten requirements for recalling officials and Constitutional Court procedures were passed by opposition lawmakers yesterday following clashes between lawmakers in the morning, as Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) members tried to block Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators from entering the chamber. Parts of the Public Officials Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法) and Constitutional Court Procedure Act (憲法訴訟法) passed the third reading yesterday. The legislature was still voting on various amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) as of press time last night, after the session was extended to midnight. Amendments to Article 4
RSS