Lawyers and academics are attacking an amendment to the Criminal Code proposed by the Ministry of Justice that they say could send journalists, defense attorneys and members of human rights groups to prison for up to one year for publicizing information about ongoing court cases that is not currently prohibited.
The draft amendment would also make it illegal for lawyers and defendants to “disobey the orders” of judges and prosecutors, among other changes.
If passed, lawyers and others would be barred from “inappropriately” publicizing the details of evidence used in court — whether from the trial of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), the Hsichih Trio case or other trials. Violators would face up a prison term or a fine of NT$300,000.
However, the draft amendment, a copy of which was obtained by the Taipei Times, does not define the word “inappropriately.”
The amendment concerns articles 165, 168 and 172 of the Criminal Code. Last week, the ministry invited lawyers and academics to review and discuss the amendment. Several lawyers and academics have since attacked the proposal in op-eds in the Chinese-language press, including the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper), the Apple Daily and the China Times.
‘The amendment is in part a reaction to public pressure over controversial cases,” lawyer Greg Yo (尤伯祥) told the Taipei Times.
Yo and Hsinchu Bar Association director-general Lo Bing-cheng (羅秉成) both suggested the amendment was related to Chen’s trial. Early this year, Chen’s lawyers went public with recordings of questioning sessions with witnesses to back their claims that prosecutors’ records were flawed.
Yo, a defense lawyer in the Hsichih Trio case and two other long-running, controversial death penalty cases, said the amendment would make lawyers think twice before contacting media when they believe their clients’ rights are being violated.
Lawyers often hold press conferences to call attention to problems including concerns that a confession was extracted by torture, that a defendant was convicted based on confessions and not evidence or that prosecutors’ records of witness statements are inaccurate. (Records from questioning sessions with witnesses are not word-for-word transcripts but summarized versions.)
The amendment would bar “inappropriate” use of case details out of court by anyone who “has” this information or “knows” this information, the ministry’s draft says.
In an op-ed piece, Lo said “the scariest thing about this amendment” is that it not only includes lawyers, but also reporters and activists who sit in on cases and write about them later.
“Clearly, this clause would quickly suppress public scrutiny of the judiciary,” he wrote.
In an interview, Yo called the act “dangerous” and a way to “threaten” lawyers and reporters not to step out of line.
In the Hsichih Trio case, Yo said that if this legislation had existed earlier, the three defendants, in absence of adequate media coverage and the public outcry this has prompted, “would likely be dead.”
The proposal also bans “inappropriate” words or actions in court and “disobeying the orders” of a judge or prosecutor. It does not define these terms.
Yo said the changes are meant to intimidate lawyers. Taiwan’s courts switched to an adversarial system — in which the defense counsel can ask witnesses questions — less than 10 years ago.
“But the judges and prosecutors — especially the prosecutors — have never been happy with that change,” Yo said, adding that this is a way to rein in lawyers.
Disobeying a judge or prosecutor would carry a maximum punishment of six months in prison or a fine of NT$9,000. This could include orders that violate a defendant’s right to remain silent and not incriminate himself (enshrined in the Criminal Procedural Code), Yo said.
He gave an example at a district court this year in which his client declined to answer a judge’s questions.
The judge became angry and instructed Yo to have his client answer. Yo refused and an argument ensued. If the amendment is passed, Yo said defendants could be intimidated into obeying in this situation, while lawyers who argue with judges could be accused of “inappropriate” words.
The proposal also bans lawyers and defendants from “harassing” witnesses under penalty of up to three years in prison or a fine of NT$100,000.
It does not define “harass.”
If the amendment is passed, Yo said he “would not dare” talk to some witnesses associated with the prosecution even though “every serious lawyer must do so” to understand their testimony and prepare as thorough a defense as possible.
The ministry has defended the proposal on its Web site, saying that it must combat actions that “interfere with judicial independence” and are “worse day by day.”
These actions include destroying or tampering with evidence, harassing witnesses and calling press conferences to make public details of evidence, it said. Current law does not punish these acts, it said, causing the public to think that the law “indulges madness.”
The ministry said it is defending the judiciary from interference in line with international legal practice.
Lo and Yo reject that argument, saying it is instead protecting prosecutors and judges and strengthening their position.
Also See: GIO response to Nov. 13 open letter
Taiwan is gearing up to celebrate the New Year at events across the country, headlined by the annual countdown and Taipei 101 fireworks display at midnight. Many of the events are to be livesteamed online. See below for lineups and links: Taipei Taipei’s New Year’s Party 2026 is to begin at 7pm and run until 1am, with the theme “Sailing to the Future.” South Korean girl group KARA is headlining the concert at Taipei City Hall Plaza, with additional performances by Amber An (安心亞), Nick Chou (周湯豪), hip-hop trio Nine One One (玖壹壹), Bii (畢書盡), girl group Genblue (幻藍小熊) and more. The festivities are to
Auckland rang in 2026 with a downtown fireworks display launched from New Zealand’s tallest structure, Sky Tower, making it the first major city to greet the new year at a celebration dampened by rain, while crowds in Taipei braved the elements to watch Taipei 101’s display. South Pacific countries are the first to bid farewell to 2025. Clocks struck midnight in Auckland, with a population of 1.7 million, 18 hours before the famous ball was to drop in New York’s Times Square. The five-minute display involved 3,500 fireworks launched from the 240m Sky Tower. Smaller community events were canceled across New Zealand’s
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday said it is closely monitoring developments in Venezuela, and would continue to cooperate with democratic allies and work together for regional and global security, stability, and prosperity. The remarks came after the US on Saturday launched a series of airstrikes in Venezuela and kidnapped Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, who was later flown to New York along with his wife. The pair face US charges related to drug trafficking and alleged cooperation with gangs designated as terrorist organizations. Maduro has denied the allegations. The ministry said that it is closely monitoring the political and economic situation
‘SLICING METHOD’: In the event of a blockade, the China Coast Guard would intercept Taiwanese ships while its navy would seek to deter foreign intervention China’s military drills around Taiwan this week signaled potential strategies to cut the nation off from energy supplies and foreign military assistance, a US think tank report said. The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) conducted what it called “Justice Mission 2025” exercises from Monday to Tuesday in five maritime zones and airspace around Taiwan, calling them a warning to “Taiwanese independence” forces. In a report released on Wednesday, the Institute for the Study of War said the exercises effectively simulated blocking shipping routes to major port cities, including Kaohsiung, Keelung and Hualien. Taiwan would be highly vulnerable under such a blockade, because it
RSS