Lawyers and academics are attacking an amendment to the Criminal Code proposed by the Ministry of Justice that they say could send journalists, defense attorneys and members of human rights groups to prison for up to one year for publicizing information about ongoing court cases that is not currently prohibited.
The draft amendment would also make it illegal for lawyers and defendants to “disobey the orders” of judges and prosecutors, among other changes.
If passed, lawyers and others would be barred from “inappropriately” publicizing the details of evidence used in court — whether from the trial of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), the Hsichih Trio case or other trials. Violators would face up a prison term or a fine of NT$300,000.
However, the draft amendment, a copy of which was obtained by the Taipei Times, does not define the word “inappropriately.”
The amendment concerns articles 165, 168 and 172 of the Criminal Code. Last week, the ministry invited lawyers and academics to review and discuss the amendment. Several lawyers and academics have since attacked the proposal in op-eds in the Chinese-language press, including the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper), the Apple Daily and the China Times.
‘The amendment is in part a reaction to public pressure over controversial cases,” lawyer Greg Yo (尤伯祥) told the Taipei Times.
Yo and Hsinchu Bar Association director-general Lo Bing-cheng (羅秉成) both suggested the amendment was related to Chen’s trial. Early this year, Chen’s lawyers went public with recordings of questioning sessions with witnesses to back their claims that prosecutors’ records were flawed.
Yo, a defense lawyer in the Hsichih Trio case and two other long-running, controversial death penalty cases, said the amendment would make lawyers think twice before contacting media when they believe their clients’ rights are being violated.
Lawyers often hold press conferences to call attention to problems including concerns that a confession was extracted by torture, that a defendant was convicted based on confessions and not evidence or that prosecutors’ records of witness statements are inaccurate. (Records from questioning sessions with witnesses are not word-for-word transcripts but summarized versions.)
The amendment would bar “inappropriate” use of case details out of court by anyone who “has” this information or “knows” this information, the ministry’s draft says.
In an op-ed piece, Lo said “the scariest thing about this amendment” is that it not only includes lawyers, but also reporters and activists who sit in on cases and write about them later.
“Clearly, this clause would quickly suppress public scrutiny of the judiciary,” he wrote.
In an interview, Yo called the act “dangerous” and a way to “threaten” lawyers and reporters not to step out of line.
In the Hsichih Trio case, Yo said that if this legislation had existed earlier, the three defendants, in absence of adequate media coverage and the public outcry this has prompted, “would likely be dead.”
The proposal also bans “inappropriate” words or actions in court and “disobeying the orders” of a judge or prosecutor. It does not define these terms.
Yo said the changes are meant to intimidate lawyers. Taiwan’s courts switched to an adversarial system — in which the defense counsel can ask witnesses questions — less than 10 years ago.
“But the judges and prosecutors — especially the prosecutors — have never been happy with that change,” Yo said, adding that this is a way to rein in lawyers.
Disobeying a judge or prosecutor would carry a maximum punishment of six months in prison or a fine of NT$9,000. This could include orders that violate a defendant’s right to remain silent and not incriminate himself (enshrined in the Criminal Procedural Code), Yo said.
He gave an example at a district court this year in which his client declined to answer a judge’s questions.
The judge became angry and instructed Yo to have his client answer. Yo refused and an argument ensued. If the amendment is passed, Yo said defendants could be intimidated into obeying in this situation, while lawyers who argue with judges could be accused of “inappropriate” words.
The proposal also bans lawyers and defendants from “harassing” witnesses under penalty of up to three years in prison or a fine of NT$100,000.
It does not define “harass.”
If the amendment is passed, Yo said he “would not dare” talk to some witnesses associated with the prosecution even though “every serious lawyer must do so” to understand their testimony and prepare as thorough a defense as possible.
The ministry has defended the proposal on its Web site, saying that it must combat actions that “interfere with judicial independence” and are “worse day by day.”
These actions include destroying or tampering with evidence, harassing witnesses and calling press conferences to make public details of evidence, it said. Current law does not punish these acts, it said, causing the public to think that the law “indulges madness.”
The ministry said it is defending the judiciary from interference in line with international legal practice.
Lo and Yo reject that argument, saying it is instead protecting prosecutors and judges and strengthening their position.
Also See: GIO response to Nov. 13 open letter
The Thai government on Friday announced that Taiwanese would be allowed to stay in the country for up to 60 days per entry, under the Southeast Asian country’s visa-free program starting from today. Taiwan is among 93 countries included in the Thai visa-waiver program, which has been expanded from 57 countries, with the visa-exempt entry extended from 30 to 60 days. After taking office last year, Thai Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin has vowed to grant more visa waivers to foreign travelers as part of efforts to stimulate tourism. The expanded visa-waiver program was on Friday signed by Thai Minister of the Interior Anutin
BAIL APPEALS: The former vice premier was ordered to be held incommunicado despite twice being granted bail and paying a total of NT$12 million in bond The Taoyuan District Court yesterday ordered the detention of former vice premier Cheng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦), who is being investigated for alleged corruption while serving as Taoyuan mayor from December 2014 to December 2022, and that he be held incommunicado. The court made the ruling during a bail hearing after prosecutors appealed its bail ruling twice. Cheng on Saturday was released after posting bail of NT$5 million (US$153,818). However, after prosecutors lodged an appeal, the High Court on Monday revoked the original ruling and ordered the Taoyuan District Court to hold another bail hearing. On Tuesday, the district court granted bail to Cheng a second
PEACE AND SECURITY: China’s military ambitions present ‘the greatest strategic challenge to Japan and the world, Japan’s annual defense white paper said yesterday Japan yesterday warned that China risked escalating tensions with Taiwan with an increase in military exercises that appeared aimed in part at readying Beijing’s forces for a possible invasion. Japan’s annual assessment of security threats, including those posed by China, North Korea and Russia, comes as Taiwan closely monitors Chinese People’s Liberation Army air and sea exercises, including one with the Shandong aircraft carrier in the Pacific Ocean. The drills are the latest in a series including maneuvers in the Taiwan Strait last year that a senior US general said would be key to any invasion. “Because of that increase in military activity,
HAN KUANG: The exercises, which are to run from July 22 to 26, will feature unscripted war games and a decentralized command and control structure, military officers said The armed forces would for the first time test new rules of engagement (ROE) at this month’s annual Han Kuang exercises, the Ministry of National Defense (MND) said yesterday. The exercises, which are to run from July 22 to 26, will feature unscripted war games, and a decentralized command and control structure, military officers told a news conference in Taipei. ROE cards would be issued to select combat troops to test their ability to function without tight control, they said. The most recent edition of the rules was published last year, they said. One of the cards’ two templates identifies enemy targets that soldiers