A majority of respondents in a poll released by Taiwan Thinktank yesterday agreed that the government should slow the pace of signing an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China and postpone next week’s fourth round of high-level cross-strait talks before a higher degree of public consensus is reached.
The survey showed that 62.5 percent of respondents agreed that “the December [5] election results showed that many people in Taiwan still have doubts about an EFCA plan and thus the [President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九)] administration should put off signing the deal with China and rather seek consensus within the country.”
Slightly more than 27 percent, meanwhile, disagreed with that statement.
On the question, among those who identified themselves as supporters of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-led pan-blue camp, 46.3 percent agreed and 43.4 percent disagreed, while among those who said they have no party affiliation, 56.1 percent agreed and 26.8 percent disagreed.
An ECFA is expected to be signed at the fifth round of negotiations next spring, but related matters will be discussed during the meeting between Straits Exchange Foundation Chairman Chiang Pin-kung (江丙坤) and his Chinese counterpart Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) next week in Taichung.
On the question of “whether Chen Yunlin should defer his visit to Taiwan until there is a higher degree of consensus on an ECFA to avoid the occurrence of conflict” following the protests that accompanied his visit in November last year, 56 percent agreed while 36.7 percent disagreed.
Among respondents without party affiliation, 56.2 percent agreed and 30.5 percent disagreed.
“Even though there is majority support for the postponement of Chen’s visit, we know for sure that this is not going to happen, which shows that the Ma administration will continue to cling obstinately to its course and go against public opinion,” said Lo Chih-cheng (羅致政), a political science professor at Soochow University.
Lo said that there was only one way to explain why Ma would stay the course.
It’s highly possible, Lo said, that the Chinese government knows it has to be quick to get some deals signed with the Ma government, otherwise it would face increasingly strong opposition from Taiwanese on the frameworks it has designed to restrain Taiwan, Lo said.
The poll showed that 58.2 percent considered the Dec. 5 local elections a “mid-term test” for Ma and that 58.7 percent said Ma had “flunked” the exam.
About 30 percent of respondents said they were satisfied with the government’s performance since Ma took office, while 65.6 percent said they were dissatisfied.
Ma’s disapproval rating among non-party affiliated respondents was 66.9 percent, while his approval rating was 23.5 percent.
Among pro-pan blue camp supporters, his disapproval rating and approval rating were 44.6 percent and 54 percent respectively.
Asked whether they worried about the future of Taiwan under Ma’s leadership, 50.2 percent of non-party affiliated respondents said “Yes,” while 45.3 percent said “No.”
The result was nearly identical for all respondents — with 51.8 percent saying “Yes” and 46 percent saying “No.”
Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) said the survey showed that “Ma’s rule has united the DPP, divided the blue camp and driven swing voters away from the KMT.”
“It’s clear that Ma’s pro-China policy has spilt the country and put him in a situation where he is not trusted,” Lin said.
The division was “not merely a partisan issue,” Lin said, calling on him to postpone the Chiang-Chen meeting.
“Some voters vote in a matter that reflects what they are told by local faction leaders, but most conscientious voters sent a message in last week’s election that they don’t trust Ma, which is a major crisis,” Lin said.
“Ma should consider holding a roundtable meeting among all parties or a national affairs conference to express his sincerity to mend the rift,” Lin said.
An analysis of the survey results also shows that Ma had lost the support of young and female voters, who were considered a major factor in his win last year.
The survey was conducted by Mater Survey & Research between Wednesday and Friday, and a total of 1,078 valid responses from people aged 20 and above were obtained.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS