The Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) has filed a protest with the organizer of the 2009 Climate Conference in Copenhagen after it was listed as being from “China,” ITRI executive vice president Chu Hsin-sen (曲新生) said yesterday.
Although the institute has sent a letter of protest, it “cannot reject” the opportunity to speak on the international stage because of the incorrect label, Chu said.
Taiwan cannot attend the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) conference as a national delegation because it is not a UN member. ITRI will be Taiwan’s official voice at the two-week Copenhagen meeting, which opens on Monday. Chu will lead the delegation, while Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) Deputy Minister Chiu Wen-yen (邱文彥) will attend as an adviser.
On the official listing of the non-governmental organizations (NGOs) admitted to the conference on its official UNFCCC Web site, ITRI is shown as being from “China.”
ITRI had applied “in the name of a non-governmental organization of Taiwan, not as an industrial research institute of China,” Chu said, adding that the listing was a mistake by the UNFCCC secretariat and the institute had responded by filing a protest.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the EPA are now working on how Taiwan can participate in the Copenhagen conference with dignity, he said.
Three other Taiwanese NGOs — the Environmental Quality Protection Foundation, the Taiwan Institute for Sustainable Energy and the Supreme Master Ching Hai International Association — are also listed as being from China.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus secretary-general Lu Hsueh-chang (呂學樟) expressed regret over the listings.
“We would like to apply for the participation using the name Taiwan, but the UNFCCC secretariat would not recognize the title. Our negotiations with it turned out to be fruitless. We really regret this, but there is nothing we can do,” Lu told a press conference.
DPP Legislator William Lai (賴清德), however, said the UNFCCC’s listing of ITRI as a Chinese NGO shows that President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) “diplomatic truce” policy had failed miserably because it had only encouraged Beijing to squeeze Taiwan off the world stage.
Lai urged academics and experts to keep Taiwan’s sovereignty in mind when trying to participate in international organizations.
“The ultimate blame is still on the Ma administration for setting a bad example by denigrating Taiwan’s status. The academics and experts were merely following the government’s footsteps,” he said.
Hsiao Hui-chuan (蕭慧娟), an executive secretary at the EPA responsible for greenhouse gas emissions reductions, said ITRI’s original application listed its address as “Hsinchu, R.O.C. (Taiwan).”
The information was then changed by the conference organizers without notifying the organization, she said.
“The minimum standard that would be acceptable to our government is ‘Chinese Taipei.’ The most ideal would, of course, be the ‘Republic of China,’” she said.
Government agencies would continue to try to attend environmental conferences under the nation’s formal name, she said.
“It doesn’t look like we will be able to attend the conference this month under the method both our agency and the foreign ministry had hoped for,” she added, referring to a Taiwanese delegation attending the World Health Assembly in May as an observer under the name “Chinese Taipei.”
COMPROMISED
The lack of official recognition will hinder the role Taiwan can play in reducing its emissions, which are estimated to be around 1 percent of the global total, officials said.
“Our county faces many problems from not being able to attend the conference as a government entity,” said Chang Tzi-chin (張子敬), deputy minister of the EPA. “This ranges from being unable to participate in global emissions trading to sharing expert dialogue.”
COMPETITIVENESS
EPA official Eric Liou (劉銘龍) said not attending could also risk undermining the nation’s economic competitiveness.
“If the conference results in a consensus on carbon emissions labeling on products, common standards in the manufacturing phase or other regulations … and [Taiwan] lacks access or information to it, we could really be at a disadvantage in the world economy,” Liou said.
UNOFFICIAL
Meanwhile, the foreign ministry said not having a government official lead the delegation to Copenhagen was a way to safeguard Taiwan’s national dignity.
Ministry spokesman Henry Chen (陳銘政) said that since the UNFCCC still has ITRI listed as a non-governmental organization from “Hsinchu, China,” having a government official as the head delegate would indirectly legitimize the nomenclature that Taiwan is so strongly opposed to.
ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY JENNY W. HSU AND FLORA WANG
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS