Wearing headbands with the words “no to poisonous beef” and “no to deception,” thousands of people took to the streets of Taipei yesterday afternoon to voice their opposition to the government’s decision to lift a ban on US bone-in beef and beef organs, and urge the government to renegotiate the agreement.
Demonstrators from all over the country started to gather at the assembly point near Zhongxiao Fuxing MRT station hours before the official start of the march.
The demonstration was organized by the Tainan County Government and several civic groups, including the Taiwan Labour Front, the Taiwan Association of University Professors and the Foundation of Medical Professionals Alliance in Taiwan, in reaction to the lifting of the ban on imports of bone-in beef, beef organs and ground beef from the US.
PHOTO: NICKY LOH, REUTERS
After the government had been negotiating with the US on the issue for about two years, the Department of Health announced on Oct. 23 that it had signed a protocol with the US that would allow bone-in beef, ground beef, bovine intestines, brains, spinal cords and processed beef from cattle younger than 30 months that have not been contaminated with “specific risk materials” (SRM) to be imported.
“Whether to lift the ban [on certain US beef parts] is a public health issue that should have been fully debated by the public before a decision was made,” Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) told the crowd before the march began at 2:30pm.
“The government never talked about it with the legislature, the opposition or the public — we only knew about it after the government had signed an agreement with the US. That violates the principles of democracy and transparency,” she said.
PHOTO: NICKY LOH, REUTERS
Tsai cited a resolution passed by the legislature in January 2006 stating that the government should consult with and gain approval from the legislature before lifting the ban on US beef parts.
“We are demonstrating to ask for one thing — that the beef deal be renegotiated,” Tsai said.
“If they [the government] cannot do it, they should step down and let us do it,” she said.
Since the announcement on Oct. 23, the government has faced an uphill battle persuading a skeptical public on the safety of US beef, with leading consumer groups and opposition politicians pushing for a referendum on reimposing the beef-on-the-bone import ban.
National Security Council Secretary-General Su Chi (蘇起) earlier this month apologized for poor communication before the lifting of the ban and the Executive Yuan pledged that it would tighten inspections and effectively block ground beef and bovine intestines by changing import inspection rules. Ground beef and intestine imports will have to be thawed for examination (ruining them in the process) and any shipments mixed with bone-in beef would be destroyed, the government said.
The unconvinced demonstrators shouted slogans and called for renegotiation, while march organizers explained through loudspeakers to the crowd and passers-by that they were against lifting the ban because bone-in beef and beef organs were more likely to carry prion, the infectious agent of mad cow disease that is composed mostly of protein.
“If you think you’ll be safe because you don’t eat beef, you’re wrong — when prion enters the food chain, it may also contaminate pork and even the soil,” a demonstrator said. “So you may be infected with mad cow disease even if you’re a vegetarian.”
The 32-year-old user of online social networking service Plurk.com, Lin Jung-cheng (林融政), was among a group of about a dozen plurkers from Taipei, Taichung and Tainan taking part in the march.
“Of course we’re worried about the safety of US beef, but we’re more upset that the government signed the agreement [to lift the ban] without telling the public first,” Lin said. “We’re quite suspicious about what the government has gained from the US in return.”
A woman surnamed Lai (賴) in her 50s took her 10-year-old grandson, dressed in a cow costume, with her to the march.
She said she didn’t care if she was infected with mad cow disease since she’s lived a full life, “but I must take part in the protest for the sake of my grandchildren and their grandchildren.”
Tang Kao Hsuan-feng (唐高炫風) drew a lot of attention for wearing his camouflage army uniform and holding a large Republic of China flag.
“I voted for [President] Ma Ying-jeou [馬英九] and was a big supporter, but that doesn’t mean that I should pretend that I don’t see when he makes mistakes, because I know what’s wrong and what’s right,” Tang Kao said. “Ma should renegotiate the beef agreement because US beef threatens the health of Taiwanese.”
Former DPP legislator Hsu Kuo-yung (徐國勇), on the other hand, urged the public to call on elected representatives to support a proposed amendment to the Act Governing Food Sanitation (食品衛生管理法) scheduled for review in the legislature on Thursday that would block imports of some US beef parts.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or