President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) yesterday rejected the possibility of renegotiating the recent pact on importing US beef, saying his administration was more cautious than the former Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) government in relaxing restrictions on US beef products.
Emphasizing it was “unnecessary” to relaunch negotiations with Washington, Ma said attempting to renegotiate the protocol would seriously undermine the country’s credibility.
“Our objectives [and our critics’] are the same: To protect the health and safety of the people,” he said. “The campaigns initiated by non-governmental organizations can attain the same goal. Such an act is allowed by the protocol and is the best arrangement.”
PHOTO: FANG PIN-CHAO, TAIPEI TIMES
Several local governments have launched campaigns against the expanded imports and Ma said he “respected” their choice. The government relaxed its restrictions, but was not responsible for promoting US beef, Ma said while meeting representatives of outstanding businesspeople and foreign business groups in Taiwan.
Under the terms of the protocol, US bone-in beef, ground beef, cow intestines, brains, spinal cords and processed beef from cattle younger than 30 months that have not been contaminated with “specific risk materials” (SRM) will be allowed into Taiwan starting on Nov. 10.
SRMs are defined in the protocol as the brain, skull, eyes, trigeminal ganglia, spinal cord, vertebral column and dorsal root ganglia of cattle 30 months of age and older, or the tonsils and the distal ileum of the small intestine from all cattle.
At present, the government only allows imports of US boneless beef from cattle younger than 30 months that contain no SRMs.
Ma said the government must respond to the request of the US, a WTO member, to lift its ban on US beef and the government’s job is to strike a balance between protecting public health and securing the opportunity to participate in the international community.
“We must ask this question: Do we want to participate in the international community or not?” he said. “Negotiations are a matter of give-and-take. You cannot simply ask other people to accept your terms without accepting theirs.”
No matter what the terms were, Ma said, the bottom line was to ensure the public’s safety and health, and his administration had met that requirement.
While the new policy takes effect next month, Ma said ground beef and intestines would not be imported from the US.
The Department of Health would also establish a mandatory liability insurance system to ensure food safety, he said.
“As far as the protection mechanism is concerned, the government has been doing its best,” he said. “Compared with the former government, we are much more careful in the decision-making process. They did not negotiate, not to mention conduct studies or visit livestock farms in the US.”
Emphasizing US beef was safe, Ma said more than 50 countries import US beef and Americans eat it. The government had adopted standards stricter than the “South Korean model” and those set by the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE), he said.
“Taiwanese have been eating boneless US beef for three years since the former government lifted the ban,” he said. “Bone-in and boneless beef all come from the same cows ... The risks posed by bone-in beef, intestines and ground beef are miniscule.”
Meanwhile, in an interview in the latest edition of The Journalist magazine (新新聞), Ma said lifting the ban could help improve relations with the US, but denied that there had been any trade-offs.
He said he hoped to see breakthroughs in the arms procurements and a trade and investment framework agreement with the US and possibly a free-trade agreement. He also hoped there would be headway in visa-waiver privileges.
In related news, a group of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Taipei City councilors protested against the new US beef policy near the Presidential Office yesterday, urging the government to refuse to import US beef products.
“The US promotes its beef based on US interests, but our president, elected by Taiwanese, has ignored the public’s health and national interest,” Taipei City Councilor Chuang Ruei-hsiung (莊瑞雄) said.
Chuang and another six DPP city councilors, including Wu Su-yao (吳思瑤) and Huang Hsiang-chun (黃向群), and their supporters tried to move closer to the Presidential Office as they carried placards and chanted slogans such as “Restart the negotiation!” and “Refuse US ground beef and internal organs!”
Taipei City police blocked the protesters to stay on a sidewalk across from the building.
Wu slammed Ma for not having any “beef” in his policies, and demanded the government begin new negotiations with the US.
Huang accused Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) of teaming up with Ma to “double-cross” the public.
“The anti-US beef association is not going to work because the city government does not have the authority to ban US beef at local stores,” Chuang said, referring to the Taipei City Government’s decision to form an association of more than 200 shops and restaurants that have agreed to boycott ground beef, and cows’ internal organs and spinal cords.
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say