THE Department of Health recently reported the case of a patient who was severely ill with a new strain of A(H1N1) influenza (swine flu) and died despite being promptly treated with the antiviral drug oseltamivir, which is sold under the trade name Tamiflu.
The case will be investigated to determine if the patient died because the virus was resistant to the drug. One way or another, however, the patient’s death should serve as a reminder that Tamiflu is not a panacea.
On Aug. 21, the WHO issued guidelines for the use of antivirals in the treatment of patients infected with the A(H1N1) pandemic virus. The document stated that most patients infected with the virus experienced typical influenza symptoms and recovered fully within a week, even without medical treatment. That being the case, healthy patients who fall ill but do not suffer complications need not be treated with antiviral drugs.
For severely ill patients and those whose condition begins to deteriorate, the WHO recommends treatment with oseltamivir as soon as possible, preferably within 48 hours after serious symptoms appear.
Dangerous symptoms listed include shortness of breath or difficulty breathing, turning blue, bloody sputum, chest pain, high fever persisting beyond three days and low blood pressure.
Among A(H1N1) patients, treatment with oseltamivir can alleviate symptoms and speed up recovery, just as with seasonal influenza patients. While some experts consider it best to administer the medicine to all confirmed A(H1N1) patients within 48 hours, the WHO guidelines recommend that antivirals only be given if patients exhibit severe symptoms. This recommendation is probably based on concern that overuse of the drug will greatly increase the possibility of drug-resistant virus strains appearing.
The WHO’s Aug. 21 update on this year’s H1N1 pandemic says that the health body had been notified of 12 cases of oseltamivir-resistant strains worldwide. These were all isolated cases arising from mutations in the virus, and there were no apparent epidemiological links between them, nor is there any evidence of onward transmission from these cases.
Even so, several oseltamivir-resistant strains of seasonal H1N1 influenza have appeared over the past few years. Since none of the drug-resistant strains that have been isolated are highly infectious, they do not pose a significant risk to public health security. Since the new, pandemic influenza strain is an H1N1 variant, it would not be surprising if drug-resistant strains were to arise as a result of nonessential use of oseltamivir.
In Taiwan, regulations on the use of oseltamivir have been relaxed, making it likely that cases of resistance to the drug will occur. The danger is that a highly infectious, drug-resistant strain of the pandemic virus may appear and spread rapidly. In that case, it would be necessary to treat patients with the other known effective antiviral drug, zanamivir (trade name Relenza), instead.
Liou Pei-pai is a former director of the Taiwan Animal Health Research Institute.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Prior to marrying a Taiwanese and moving to Taiwan, a Chinese woman, surnamed Zhang (張), used her elder sister’s identity to deceive Chinese officials and obtain a resident identity card in China. After marrying a Taiwanese, surnamed Chen (陳) and applying to move to Taiwan, Zhang continued to impersonate her sister to obtain a Republic of China ID card. She used the false identity in Taiwan for 18 years. However, a judge ruled that her case does not constitute forgery and acquitted her. Does this mean that — as long as a sibling agrees — people can impersonate others to alter, forge
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
In the weeks following the 2024 US presidential election, I have received one question more than any other from friends in Taiwan — how will Donald J. Trump’s return to the White House affect Taiwan and cross-Strait relations? Some Taiwan counterparts have argued that Trump hates China, so therefore he will support Taiwan, according to the logic that the enemy of one’s enemy is a friend. Others have expressed anxiety that Trump will put pressure on Taiwan to dramatically increase defense spending, or to compensate the United States for allegedly “stealing” America’s semiconductor sector. While I understand these hopes and concerns, I