New York University (NYU) professor Jerome Cohen has lamented the reluctance of members of Taiwan’s legal profession to speak out about problems with the judicial system.
In his latest article, Cohen criticizes the nation’s “law professors, legal scholars and social scientists” for their failure to highlight perceived injustices within the system, while comparing them unfavorably with their Chinese counterparts.
The piece, entitled “Silence of the Lambs,” appeared in Thursday’s edition of Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post.
Speaking about a recent trip to Taiwan, Cohen, the co-director of NYU’s US-Asia law institute and President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) supervisor during his studies at Harvard, said that he had heard numerous complaints from legal academics about biased judges and political prosecution, the lack of progress on judicial reform and the continued detention of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁).
While these people were prepared to share their grievances with him in private, Cohen said that they were unwilling to go public, saying they feared they would be accused of being a pan-green supporter or of being soft on corruption.
Others said going public would make little difference, that they were too busy with work or family, or that it could interfere with government appointments, he wrote.
Cohen went on to say that without such public concern it would “be difficult to achieve optimum solutions to many major law reform issues” in Taiwan.
Legal professionals in Taiwan who hold back are exercising fewer freedoms than their Chinese counterparts, he said, who often risk their “physical safety, their careers and their family’s well-being by ‘speaking truth to power.’”
“If they fail to take advantage of their hard-earned freedoms to speak out, they put their society’s precious accomplishments at risk,” he wrote.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS