Signs from Washington over the last few days must have encouraged those in the military who are clamoring for the purchase of 66 F-16C/D fighter jets from the US.
Politicians attending a Taiwan-themed conference this week gave indications there was broad consensus on Capitol Hill to support such a move, and this was followed by more positive news on future arms sales from Kurt Campbell during his Senate confirmation hearing on Wednesday for the post of assistant secretary of state for East Asian affairs.
Let’s be blunt: Taiwan’s Air Force is in desperate need of some new hardware.
A recent article in Defense News said the Air Force has 390 fighters, including 146 F-16A/Bs, purchased in 1992; 128 Indigenous Defense Fighters, developed in the 1980s; 56 Mirage jets, also purchased in 1992 but which may soon be mothballed because of high maintenance costs; and roughly 60 F-5s, which are due to be retired in the next few years.
Compare this situation with China’s rapidly modernizing military arsenal and it is clear that the Air Force needs the US to act fast on this matter if it is to maintain any semblance of credibility in air power.
Support from US lawmakers, however, does not necessarily translate to a green light, as any arms sale would also need the approval of the White House, the State Department and the Pentagon.
The likelihood of that approval is hard to assess because after five months in office there is no clear indication of the Obama administration’s policy direction on Taiwan.
Campbell’s confirmation would be a good sign, as he has a strong record of support for Taiwan. But he alone will not be enough, as there are others in the administration, such as special envoy to North Korea Stephen Bosworth, who see Taiwan’s democracy as an irritant in the US’ relations with China.
There has been talk of a Taiwan policy review and this will surely be the key to determining the scope and scale of any sales, but Chinese relations with the US will also have a bearing on future deals, despite Washington’s claims to the contrary.
But the biggest hurdle to sales of more advanced weaponry may be Taiwan itself.
Although there has been lots of positive feedback from US officials on the direction of cross-strait relations since the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) returned to power in May last year, the rapid pace of the rapprochement must also have raised concerns about the wisdom of selling advanced weaponry to Taipei while noises emanate from both sides of the Taiwan Strait about “military confidence-building measures.”
President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) policy of downplaying Taiwan’s military capacity to curry favor with Beijing and elicit economic favors could also make Taiwan reluctant to pursue such a high-profile deal.
This would not only compromise Taiwan’s position in cross-strait negotiations, betraying those who do not want Taiwan to capitulate to Chinese demands, but also further baffle sections of a military already confused about its role.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s