President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has filed an appeal at the Taipei District Court after prosecutors decided not to indict Hou Kuan-jen (侯寬仁), a prosecutor on the Special Investigation Panel (SIP) of the Supreme Prosecutors Office, for forgery.
Taipei District Court spokesperson Huang Chun-ming (黃俊明) said yesterday the court received a letter of committal for trial in March from Ma’s attorney, but the court has yet to announce its ruling.
Hou was one of the prosecutors investigating Ma’s handling of his special allowance funds when he was Taipei mayor, minister of justice, vice chairman of the Mainland Affairs Council and other posts.
PHOTO: LIN CHENG-KUNG, TAIPEI TIMES
Ma sued Hou for forgery in January last year, alleging that Hou had inaccurately documented his questioning of Wu Li-ju (吳麗洳), a Taipei City Government treasurer, about Ma’s use of his mayoral special allowance.
Last year Ma asked the court to remove three prosecutors from his cases for “bias.”
State Public Prosecutor-General Chen Tsung-ming (陳聰明) rejected the request.
At a meeting last year with the Arbitration Association of the Republic of China, Ma made a reference to his own legal woes by saying that more attention should be paid to accurately documenting questioning sessions.
Although Ma has dropped several of the lawsuits he filed during the presidential campaign last year, he did not drop the charges against the prosecutors who investigated him for graft.
Attorney Billy Chen (陳達成) said Ma’s appeal was a way of “killing a chicken to scare the monkeys,” a Chinese idiom meaning to make a big show of punishing one person to elicit fear in others.
If Ma had anything against the prosecutor, he did not have to use judicial means because he was the president and has the power to demote prosecutors, who are civil service employees, Chen said.
“If [Ma] is dissatisfied with a prosecutor, he only has to tell the premier, who can order the minister of justice to demote [or punish by other means] the prosecutor,” Chen said, but such a low-key action would not serve as a warning to other prosecutors and investigators.
Presidential Office Public Affairs Department director Tsai Chung-li (蔡仲禮) said that Ma decided to appeal not out of personal interest but to serve as an example to others because every citizen could encounter such a situation.
“It is not a small matter,” Tsai said said. “It is a matter of principle and judicial justice and an important part of the judicial reform. He will set an example.”
Special Investigative Panel spokesperson Chen Yun-nan (陳雲南) visited the Presidential Office yesterday afternoon, but Tsai said he did not meet Ma.
While Minister of Justice Wang Ching-feng (王清峰) said she respected the president’s right to appeal, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Gao Jyh-peng (高志鵬) was critical of Ma.
“Big president bullies small prosecutor,” Gao said, adding that Ma was narrow-minded and he could not forgive being indicted.
Gao called on Ma to respect the results of the investigation.
ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY KO SHU-LING AND RICH CHANG
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say
RSS