Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said yesterday President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) would hear “the people’s angry shouts” on May 17 if he insists on signing an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China.
Tsai made the remark in a keynote speech she delivered at the Taiwan Citizen Conference on National Affairs convened by the DPP and the Taiwan Solidarity Union.
Tsai said it was a pity that Ma did not attend yesterday’s meeting, which focused on various issues related to the signing of an ECFA, and that he had missed a chance to listen to the voice of the people and address concerns about inking an ECFA with China.
“I will not meet Ma if a real debate on signing an ECFA and other national issues is not possible ... If Ma continues to ignore the voice of the people and continues to push the ECFA, people will be left with only one choice — to shout angrily on May 17 so Ma can hear their voices,” she said, referring to a demonstration scheduled to be held in Taipei by the DPP, pro-localization groups and groups representing traditional industries.
Noting that last week Ma led government officials in paying tribute to the Yen Emperor, Tsai said: “If the president’s mind is always lingering on thoughts of a motherland in a distant place, people have to worry if the president would protect the nation or whether Taiwan’s best interests will be put in jeopardy?”
Tsai said she would like to ask Ma three questions.
“Are Taiwan and China two countries, or two areas?” she asked.
Tsai said that Ma has not responded to Chinese President Hu Jintao’s (胡錦濤) remarks on Dec. 31 on the 30th anniversary of Beijing’s “Open letter to Taiwanese compatriots,” in which Hu said that Taiwan and China could discuss anything as long as the “one China” principle was recognized by both sides.
“Does that mean Ma has acquiesced to the ‘one China’ principle?” she asked.
“The third question,” Tsai said. “How can Ma engage with China and the international community without hurting the sovereignty of Taiwan in view of Ma’s insistence that the so-called ‘1992 consensus’ exists, a consensus that Beijing does not recognize?”
Tsai accused the Ma administration of failing to implement effective measures to address the recession. Instead, it relies on China as a way to resolve economic difficulties, all the while keeping quiet about the price to be paid as a result of Taiwan’s heavy dependence on China, she said.
Ma should apologize for the poor performance of his government and reshuffle the Cabinet, Tsai said.
At a separate setting yesterday, the Presidential Office expressed regret over Tsai’s rejection of Ma’s invitation to meet.
Presidential Office Spokesman Wang Yu-chi (王郁琦) said Ma invited Tsai because he hoped both the ruling and opposition parties could put aside their differences and work for the well-being of the people.
“There are no differences that cannot be resolved. There is no political party that cannot cooperate,” Wang said. “If both the ruling and opposition parties could start a dialogue and develop a relationship that is both competitive and cooperative, it would herald a new future for Taiwan’s democracy.”
Presidential Office Secretary-General Chan Chun-po (詹春柏) delivered an invitation to DPP caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) to give it to Tsai at Ma’s request on Thursday.
DPP headquarters turned down the invitation to meet at a memorial service marking the 100th anniversary of the birth of president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), saying that Ma has turned the memorial service into a promotional event for himself and that it would be inappropriate for Tsai to meet Ma for discussions in that context.
The DPP, meanwhile, extended an invitation to Ma to attend yesterday’s State Affairs Forum.
While the DPP made public the content of Tsai’s letter before Ma received it on Friday night, Wang yesterday declined to say whether such a move was disrespectful.
However, he said that they had not revealed the contents of Ma’s letter in advance out of respect.
Talks about a meeting between Ma and Tsai have been in the air for a while, but Ma and Tsai have not been able to agree on an agenda or the format of any discussion. While Tsai prefers an open debate, she told Ma in her letter that their meeting would be pointless if Ma just wanted to exchange greetings.
Wang yesterday said it was “unfair” and “incorrect” to make such an assumption. Ma would be more than happy to meet Tsai if she thought the time was right, Wang said.
Wang said Ma told Tsai in the invitation that he was sincere about the meeting and that he was open to the time and issue and that the meeting would be open to the public.
Responding to Tsai’s criticism of Ma’s worship of the Yen Emperor, Wang said it was common practice in the central government and that Ma attended this year to show his sincerity.
GEARING UP: An invasion would be difficult and would strain China’s forces, but it has conducted large-scale training supporting an invasion scenario, the report said China increased its military pressure on Taiwan last year and took other steps in preparation for a potential invasion, an annual report published by the US Department of Defense on Wednesday showed. “Throughout 2023, Beijing continued to erode longstanding norms in and around Taiwan by employing a range of pressure tactics against Taiwan,” the report said, which is titled “Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China (PRC) 2024.” The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) “is preparing for a contingency to unify Taiwan with the PRC by force, if perceived as necessary by Beijing, while simultaneously deterring, delaying or denying
‘LAGGING BEHIND’: The NATO secretary-general called on democratic allies to be ‘clear-eyed’ about Beijing’s military buildup, urging them to boost military spending NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte mentioning China’s bullying of Taiwan and its ambition to reshape the global order has significance during a time when authoritarian states are continuously increasing their aggression, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) said yesterday. In a speech at the Carnegie Europe think tank in Brussels on Thursday, Rutte said Beijing is bullying Taiwan and would start to “nibble” at Taiwan if Russia benefits from a post-invasion peace deal with Ukraine. He called on democratic allies to boost defense investments and also urged NATO members to increase defense spending in the face of growing military threats from Russia
PEACEFUL RESOLUTION: A statement issued following a meeting between Australia and Britain reiterated support for Taiwan and opposition to change in the Taiwan Strait Canada should support the peaceful resolution of Taiwan’s destiny according to the will of Taiwanese, Canadian lawmakers said in a resolution marking the second anniversary of that nation’s Indo-Pacific strategy on Monday. The Canadian House of Commons committee on Canada-Chinese relations made the comment as part of 34 recommendations for the new edition of the strategy, adding that Ottawa should back Taiwan’s meaningful participation in international organizations. Canada’s Indo-Pacific Strategy, first published in October 2022, emphasized that the region’s security, trade, human rights, democracy and environmental protection would play a crucial role in shaping Canada’s future. The strategy called for Canada to deepen
TECH CONFERENCE: Input from industry and academic experts can contribute to future policymaking across government agencies, President William Lai said Multifunctional service robots could be the next new area in which Taiwan could play a significant role, given its strengths in chip manufacturing and software design, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) chairman and chief executive C.C. Wei (魏哲家) said yesterday. “In the past two months, our customers shared a lot of their future plans with me. Artificial intelligence [AI] and AI applications were the most talked about subjects in our conversation,” Wei said in a speech at the National Science and Technology Conference in Taipei. TSMC, the world’s biggest contract chipmaker, counts Nvidia Corp, Advanced Micro Devices Inc, Apple Inc and