The Control Yuan will launch an investigation into the Government Information Office’s (GIO) response to the scandal involving an official who allegedly wrote articles defaming Taiwan and Taiwanese, Control Yuan member Chien Lin Whei-jun (錢林慧君) said.
The GIO on Monday referred Kuo Kuan-ying (郭冠英), director of the information division at Taiwan’s representative office in Toronto, to the Judicial Yuan’s Commission on the Disciplinary Sanctions of Functionaries for investigation.
The referral came after the GIO said it was dissatisfied with Kuo’s explanation. GIO Vice Minister George Hsu (?? said on Monday that there was a “substantial gap” between the evidence and Kuo’s answers concerning the articles published under the pen name “Fan Lan-chin” (范蘭欽).
PHOTO: WANG YI-SUNG, TAIPEI TIMES
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Kuan Bi-ling (管碧玲) accused Kuo last week of being Fan, whose Web log carries numerous articles containing offensive remarks. Kuo said he had only written one of the articles.
The articles refer to Taiwanese as taibazi (台巴子, “Taiwanese rednecks”) and wokou (倭寇, “Japanese pirates”). The articles say “the imposition of martial law [was] a benevolent act” and that “[China] should spend many years suppressing [people in Taiwan] instead of granting any political freedom once it has taken Taiwan by force.”
Kuo was summoned back to Taiwan to answer questions at the GIO in a meeting on Monday, where he denied that he was Fan.
Control Yuan member Huang Wu-tzu (黃武次) yesterday withdrew a request he filed on Monday to investigate, but Chien Lin disagreed.
The GIO’s referral of Kuo to the judiciary’s commission made clear that a Control Yuan investigation was needed, Control Yuan Secretary-General Chen Feng-yi (陳豐義) quoted Huang as saying.
Chien Lin yesterday registered her intention with the Control Yuan to investigate the case. Chen said the Control Yuan respected the authority of individual members.
“After Kuo explained himself to the GIO, the GIO failed to give the public a clear account of the matter. I want to find out whether the GIO tried to cover up for Kuo,” Chien Lin said.
The Control Yuan’s decision came after Taipei City councilors Chien Yu-yen (簡余晏) and Chen Chien-ming (陳建銘) visited the Control Yuan yesterday, demanding it look into the case.
The city councilors accused Kuo of violating Article 114 and Article 115 of the Criminal Code on treason and public intimidation and Article 5 of the Law on Discipline of Civil Servants (公務人員懲戒法) concerning dereliction of duty.
Later yesterday, GIO Minister Su Jun-pin (蘇俊賓) said the GIO had sent all the evidence the office had collected, as well as evidence from Kuan and other sources, to the commission.
Su dismissed criticism by DPP lawmakers that the GIO had shifted responsibility onto the commission, saying that the GIO’s handling of the matter was in accordance with the law.
“If it is proven that Kuo is Fan Lan-chin, Kuo will be severely punished. But right now, given the discrepancies between our understanding and Kuo’s explanation, we need the Commission on the Disciplinary Sanctions of Functionaries to clarify the matter. We believe the commission will make a definitive decision,” Su said.
Legislators across party lines yesterday expressed dissatisfaction with the GIO’s handling of the matter.
At a press conference, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus deputy secretary-general Lin Hung-chih (林鴻池) said the GIO’s decision to move Kuo to a non-managerial position was “unacceptable.”
Lin said Kuo was a “butcher” who had sabotaged ethnic harmony in Taiwan, adding that the commission should mete out severe punishment and the Control Yuan should investigate.
Separately yesterday, Kuan said the GIO should suspend Kuo or fire him and warned that about 70 percent of officials who are referred to the commission for investigation escape punishment or receive only a slap on the wrist.
During a question-and-answer session with DPP legislators Huang Wei-cher (黃偉哲) and Su Chen-ching (蘇震清), Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄) agreed with Huang and Su that although public officials enjoy freedom of speech, they should not publish remarks that insult the nation.
Liu said that the government disapproved of the remarks in the articles, but he believed the majority of the nation’s public officials did not think that way.
“If we can deal with the matter of Kuo properly, all of the nation’s public officials will see that we disapprove of [such remarks],” Liu said.
But Su described Kuo as “incompetent,” saying he did not deserve to earn a salary paid by taxpayers.
When approached by reporters, Minister of Foreign Affairs Francisco Ou (歐鴻鍊) said it was not his place to comment because Kuo was a GIO staffer, but that it was “inappropriate” for a person on the government payroll to harm the nation’s image.
Also yesterday, the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) filed a treason lawsuit against Kuo at the Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office.
TSU Deputy Secretary-General Liu Yi-teh (劉一德) said in front of the district prosecutors’ office that Kuo had enjoyed a high salary paid by Taiwan, yet published articles defaming Taiwan and the Taiwanese and provoking ethnic tensions in violation of the law.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Lee Chun-yee (李俊毅) said that according to government statistics, only 5.97 percent of public servants lost their posts after being referred to the commission. The DPP caucus would closely watch the probe into Kuo, Lee said.
ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY RICH CHANG
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
INVESTMENT WATCH: The US activity would not affect the firm’s investment in Taiwan, where 11 production lines would likely be completed this year, C.C. Wei said Investments by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) in the US should not be a cause for concern, but rather seen as the moment that the company and Taiwan stepped into the global spotlight, President William Lai (賴清德) told a news conference at the Presidential Office in Taipei yesterday alongside TSMC chairman and chief executive officer C.C. Wei (魏哲家). Wei and US President Donald Trump in Washington on Monday announced plans to invest US$100 billion in the US to build three advanced foundries, two packaging plants, and a research and development center, after Trump threatened to slap tariffs on chips made
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say
RSS