In a bid to put Yushan on the world map and generate tourism, the Construction and Planning Administration called on Taiwanese recently to vote for Taiwan’s highest peak in an online contest organized by the New7Wonders Foundation to select the world’s new “seven natural wonders.”
Taiwanese responded to the call and thanks to their enthusiasm, Yushan currently tops the list in the “Mountains and Volcanoes” category.
One would think that such endeavors would help inspire a sense of pride in Taiwanese, if not increase hope that such a ranking would have a positive effect on tourism.
It is therefore disheartening to see that on the contest Web site, Yushan is referred to — quite incongruously, given that in such a contest geographical location is important — as “a central mountain range in Chinese Taipei.”
So much for Taiwan’s natural wonders. Or the country’s dignity. In one fell swoop, Taiwan has been removed from the world map and replaced by an appellation that has neither historical validity nor grounding in reality.
Even more irritating has been the government’s lassitude on the matter. The Construction and Planning Administration has been conspicuously silent, as have other branches of government. Not a single attempt appears to have been made to have the name rectified. Asked by reporters if government agencies would request a change on the Web site, government officials shrugged it off as a minor incident.
When a country’s officials are not adamant in their defense of its name, how can they be expected to uphold its visibility? If Yushan wins the contest, will people abroad wishing to visit it rush to buy tickets to China — or will they ask their travel agent which airline flies to that odd place called “Chinese Taipei”?
In international sports competitions, Taiwan has been bound by the Olympic formula, an agreement reached in 1981 between the International Olympic Committee and Taiwan in which it competes under the name “Chinese Taipei” at the Olympic Games.
But nowhere is it stipulated that Taiwan should be called “Chinese Taipei” in other international activities.
Many vividly remember President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), back when he was Taipei mayor, shooting Taiwan’s dignity down in flames by inventing his own demeaning “Taipei formula” that asked spectators not to display national flags at international sports events.
The passive response from officials in the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government to the Yushan case suggests that this mentality is still very much alive, if not spreading.
In a final insult, Yushan National Park Administration director Chen Lung-sheng (陳隆陞) said last week that Taiwanese should also vote for the Yangtze river “to strive for the glory of both sides of the Taiwan Strait.”
Why that river? Why not encourage voters to pick the Ganges, or Venezuela’s Angel Falls? It is difficult to argue that there was no political meaning behind Chen’s remark.
It is upsetting enough that Taiwanese sports teams have to compete under the name “Chinese Taipei.” It’s even worse when government officials cannot be bothered to defend the country’s name in other, non-sports contexts, especially when there is no agreement binding them to abide by any other.
The US Department of Defense recently released this year’s “Report on Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China.” This annual report provides a comprehensive overview of China’s military capabilities, strategic objectives and evolving global ambitions. Taiwan features prominently in this year’s report, as capturing the nation remains central to Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) vision of the “great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation,” a goal he has set for 2049. The report underscores Taiwan’s critical role in China’s long-term strategy, highlighting its significance as a geopolitical flashpoint and a key target in China’s quest to assert dominance
The National Development Council (NDC) on Wednesday last week launched a six-month “digital nomad visitor visa” program, the Central News Agency (CNA) reported on Monday. The new visa is for foreign nationals from Taiwan’s list of visa-exempt countries who meet financial eligibility criteria and provide proof of work contracts, but it is not clear how it differs from other visitor visas for nationals of those countries, CNA wrote. The NDC last year said that it hoped to attract 100,000 “digital nomads,” according to the report. Interest in working remotely from abroad has significantly increased in recent years following improvements in
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
RSS