A Presidential Office official last night backpedaled on remarks made by President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) on Thursday on whether discussions on signing an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China would be included in upcoming cross-strait negotiations.
While attending the annual Hsieh Nien Fan hosted by the American Chamber of Commerce, Ma said he hoped Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) Chairman Chiang Pin-kung (江丙坤) would discuss the possibility of signing an economic agreement while meeting Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS) Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) in their forthcoming round of cross-strait talks, which are expected to take place in May or June in Beijing.
The agenda should include issues such as daily scheduled flights, joint efforts to combat crime, two-way investments and discussions about signing an ECFA, Ma said, adding that Taiwan should adopt a step-by-step approach in promoting the proposal.
"We can have a framework first, then we can discuss and deal with more urgent issues. We don't need to rush," Ma said at the time, adding that the proposed agreement was purely economic and would not involve sensitive issues such as sovereignty, independence or unification with China.
Later last night however, Presidential Office Spokesman Wang Yu-chi (王郁琦) was quoted in a Central News Agency report as saying that because of time constraints, the upcoming Chiang-Chen talks would not touch on ECFA issues, but added that the president hoped an exchange of opinions on the issue would take place on the sidelines of the Chiang-Chen meeting.
Approached by reporters on her way to the legislative floor yesterday, Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) Chairwoman Lai Shin-yuan (賴幸媛) said that if the president wanted the ECFA included in the forthcoming talks, the MAC would make arrangements.
“An ECFA could probably be brought up as a topic at the upcoming talks between Chiang and Chen if consensus is reached in the country beforehand and both sides of the Taiwan Strait are prepared,” she said.
Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄), however, was more reserved on the matter than Lai.
"For the time being, we have no plan to place this on the formal agenda for the third cross-strait negotiations,” Liu said when fielding questions from Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers Pan Meng-an (潘孟安) and Huang Sue-ying (黃淑英) during a question-and-answer session yesterday.
“I believe what President Ma was referring to was an initial exchange of ideas [on the ECFA issue] on the sidelines of the [Chiang-Chen] meeting without getting into substantial contents [of the pact],” Liu said.
Liu said his administration would not forbid SEF negotiators from talking about the ECFA issue at the meeting, but added that the talks "will generate neither resolution nor outcome."
Later yesterday, when questioned by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Chung Shao-ho (鍾紹和) over whether the economic pact could further open the country's doors to agricultural products from China, Liu reiterated his administration’s position on retaining the current cap on Chinese agricultural products.
"Besides the more than 1,000 agricultural products already approved for importation, we will not approve others from the 800 agricultural products on the prohibition import list," Liu said.
At a separate setting yesterday, DPP Legislator Lee Chun-yee (李俊毅) said the DPP caucus was shocked that Ma had suggested discussion of an ECFA could be included in the forthcoming Chiang-Chen talks, especially given that Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) had recently stated that the signing of an economic pact with Taiwan would have to proceed under the "one China" principle.
"Wen's remarks were very clear in insisting that the economic treaty be signed under the `one China' principle, yet Ma said the pact would not involve the `one China' issue," Lee said, calling on Ma to explain the controversy.
The DPP caucus again called on the government to forward its ECFA proposal for legislative review before Chiang continues talks with his Chinese counterpart.
ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY RICH CHANG AND CNA
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS