Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄) promised not to sign an “economic cooperation framework agreement” (ECFA) with China under a “political” framework yesterday amid opposition lawmakers’ concerns that the nation would not have equal footing with China.
During a question-and-answer session with Democratic Progressive Party legislators Chiu Yi-ying (邱議瑩) and Cheng Ting-fei (陳亭妃), Liu said he did not agree that signing an ECFA would be a move toward unification.
“It would be impossible [for the government to do that],” he said.
The government’s plan to sign an agreement has sparked widespread concern. President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said last week that the government would push for the implementation of an agreement, but would seek public opinion on the agreement’s title, content and form. The government had been describing the proposed pact as a cross-strait comprehensive economic cooperation agreement (CECA), but on Friday Ma sought to quell the uproar by relabeling it an “economic cooperation framework agreement.”
But Ma’s move was criticized by Chen and Chiu, who said it proved the government had no idea of the impact of such an agreement.
Liu responded by saying: “Focusing on the English name of the agreement is meaningless ... its English name is not the point … Generally speaking, it is a more comprehensive agreement on the framework of cross-strait economic [cooperation].”
Liu said the government was expected to negotiate on products, services, copyright dispute resolution mechanisms and related matters with Beijing during talks on a pact. However, he refused to provide details of the proposed deal.
“How are we going to negotiate it if we reveal the content now?” he said.
Earlier in the day, Mainland Affairs Council Chairwoman Lai Shin-yuan (賴幸媛) dismissed media speculation that an ECFA would symbolize a “one China” market.
“[The government wishes] to sign cross-strait economic cooperation agreements in a bid to normalize economic and trade relations and prevent Taiwan from being marginalized,” she said. “It is a pragmatic economic measure and agreement. It is not political at all. It has nothing to do with a ‘one China’ market.”
The Presidential Office also dismissed complaints that it would be impossible to bar some Chinese products in negotiating an economic agreement with China.
“It is a common practice to establish a ‘safeguard mechanism’ when two countries discuss a free-trade agreement,” Presidential Office Spokesman Wang Yu-chi (王郁琦) said in response to questions on whether Ma could make good on his promise to bar some Chinese products or industries.
Since the content of the ECFA had not been finalized, various issues could be discussed at the negotiating table including tariffs and protecting investments and intellectual property rights, he said.
Wang said a “safeguard mechanism” was what Ma promised during last year’s campaign. There were many precedents for countries limiting certain products, citing South Korea and Japan as examples.
Also See: Forum slams proposed ECFA
Also See: EDITORIAL: CECA or ECFA: Who cares?
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS