US President Barack Obama was to announce yesterday that he plans to withdraw the bulk of US troops from Iraq by August next year, but wants to leave tens of thousands behind to advise Iraqi forces and protect US interests, congressional officials said.
Obama, who campaigned on ending the unpopular Iraq war within 16 months of taking office, has been largely focused in his first weeks as president on turning around the collapsing US economy.
Yesterday’s expected Iraq announcement comes a day after he unveiled an ambitious budget that promises a major overhaul of the US’ costly healthcare system and sets aside an additional US$750 billion to help rescue the US troubled financial system.
TIMETABLE
The Iraq withdrawal timetable would stretch over 19 months from his inauguration last month, three more months than he promised during his campaign. He is expected to announce the new strategy during a trip to the Marine Corps base at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina.
In a sign of the shifting war debate in Washington, Obama is not facing scrutiny over the exact timing of the withdrawal, but rather how deep it really is.
Obama told a closed-door meeting on Thursday with Republican and Democratic leaders that 35,000 to 50,000 troops would remain in Iraq after the bulk of troops are withdrawn, congressional officials said. The maintenance of a residual force for a period of time is not a surprise, but some leaders of Obama’s own party pushed back on just how big it will be.
“When they talk about 50,000, that’s a little higher number than I had anticipated,” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Democrat, said before the briefing.
An existing US-Iraq agreement, negotiated under former US president George W. Bush, calls for US combat troops to withdraw from Baghdad and other cities by the end of June, with all US forces out of the country by the end of 2011.
More than 4,250 US military members have died since the war began in March 2003, though US military deaths plunged by two-thirds last year from the previous year, a reflection of improving security after a troop buildup in 2007.
The US$750 billion bailout fund is in addition to the US$700 billion bank bailout passed by Congress last October.
Obama has pointedly said he has inherited the deficit from his predecessor and sought to draw a clear distinction with the former Bush administration, saying “the time has come to usher in a new era — a new era of responsibility” both in government and the private sector.
“This budget is an honest accounting of where we are and where we intend to go,” the president said at a ceremony to present the spending plan.
He was referring to former president George W. Bush’s practice of excluding the cost of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan in budget accounting.
AGRICULTURE SUBSIDIES
Obama also promises to phase out direct payments to farming operations with revenues above US$500,000 a year. US farm subsidies have been a point of contention in global trade talks, as critics believe they give US farmers an unfair advantage in world markets.
It is not clear yet whether Obama’s promise to bring combat troops home from Iraq will carry a cost saving in the near term. The US has been spending about US$11 billion to US$12 billion per month fighting two wars.
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say
RSS