The government will consider asking the Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) not to mention the so-called “1992 consensus” during its talks with Beijing’s Association on Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS) next week, Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄) said yesterday.
“The government only authorized the SEF to discuss the two issues [direct charter flights and Chinese tourists] during the meeting. Negotiations on political issues are not included,” Liu said yesterday during a question-and-answer session at the Legislative Yuan.
Liu made the remarks in response to comments by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Tsai Huang-liang (蔡煌瑯), who urged the government not to include the “1992 consensus” in any documents to be signed by the SEF and ARATS in order to defend the country’s sovereignty.
The SEF and ARATS will hold cross-strait talks in Beijing from June 12 to June 14 on direct charter flights and opening Taiwan to Chinese tourists.
The Beijing talks will be the first official cross-strait negotiations since 1999.
“The ‘1992 consensus’ means ‘one China principle’ for China and it would be belittling Taiwan’s sovereignty if any formal documents mentioned the consensus,” Tsai said.
The “1992 consensus” refers to a fictional consensus said to have been reached between Chinese and Taiwanese negotiators during talks in Hong Kong that posits “one China, with each side having its own interpretation.”
The KMT has said the “1992 consensus” means “one China, with each side having its own interpretation,” while, Beijing has said that both sides agreed on the “one China” principle during the meeting.
Liu yesterday repeated the KMT’s interpretation of the “1992 consensus,” but added that the upcoming cross-strait talks between the SEF and ARATS would not address political issues.
“The SEF was not authorized to discuss the issue of the ‘1992 consensus,’” he said.
Meanwhile, DPP Legislator Chiu Yi-ying (邱議瑩) yesterday questioned Mainland Affairs Council chairwoman Lai Shin-yuan (賴幸媛) on the government’s failure to include the issue of cargo charter flights in the SEF-ARATS talks.
The DPP has criticized the government for what it has called a rush to deliver on President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) campaign promises of cross-strait weekend passenger charter flights and Chinese tourists coming to Taiwan on July 4.
The DPP said the most important issue of cross-strait cargo charter flights had been left out and that these flights were urgently needed by Taiwan, Taiwanese businesspeople operating in China and foreign businesspeople investing in Taiwan.
In response, Lai said the issue would be included in the discussion on the weekend charter flights.
Because of recent gas price hikes and the complexity of cargo charter fights, however, it would be difficult for both sides to implement the cargo charter flights soon, Lai said.
Tsai urged Liu and Lai to focus the SEF-ARATS negotiations on the cargo charter flight, as Taiwan would benefit more from the measure.
Additional reporting by CNA
BACK IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD: The planned transit by the ‘Baden-Wuerttemberg’ and the ‘Frankfurt am Main’ would be the German Navy’s first passage since 2002 Two German warships are set to pass through the Taiwan Strait in the middle of this month, becoming the first German naval vessels to do so in 22 years, Der Spiegel reported on Saturday. Reuters last month reported that the warships, the frigate Baden-Wuerttemberg and the replenishment ship Frankfurt am Main, were awaiting orders from Berlin to sail the Strait, prompting a rebuke to Germany from Beijing. Der Spiegel cited unspecified sources as saying Beijing would not be formally notified of the German ships’ passage to emphasize that Berlin views the trip as normal. The German Federal Ministry of Defense declined to comment. While
‘UPHOLDING PEACE’: Taiwan’s foreign minister thanked the US Congress for using a ‘creative and effective way’ to deter Chinese military aggression toward the nation The US House of Representatives on Monday passed the Taiwan Conflict Deterrence Act, aimed at deterring Chinese aggression toward Taiwan by threatening to publish information about Chinese Communist Party (CCP) officials’ “illicit” financial assets if Beijing were to attack. The act would also “restrict financial services for certain immediate family of such officials,” the text of the legislation says. The bill was introduced in January last year by US representatives French Hill and Brad Sherman. After remarks from several members, it passed unanimously. “If China chooses to attack the free people of Taiwan, [the bill] requires the Treasury secretary to publish the illicit
A senior US military official yesterday warned his Chinese counterpart against Beijing’s “dangerous” moves in the South China Sea during the first talks of their kind between the commanders. Washington and Beijing remain at odds on issues from trade to the status of Taiwan and China’s increasingly assertive approach in disputed maritime regions, but they have sought to re-establish regular military-to-military talks in a bid to prevent flashpoint disputes from spinning out of control. Samuel Paparo, commander of the US Indo-Pacific Command, and Wu Yanan (吳亞男), head of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Southern Theater Command, talked via videoconference. Paparo “underscored the importance
CHINA POLICY: At the seventh US-EU Dialogue on China, the two sides issued strong support for Taiwan and condemned China’s actions in the South China Sea The US and EU issued a joint statement on Wednesday supporting Taiwan’s international participation, notably omitting the “one China” policy in a departure from previous similar statements, following high-level talks on China and the Indo-Pacific region. The statement also urged China to show restraint in the Taiwan Strait. US Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell and European External Action Service Secretary-General Stefano Sannino cochaired the seventh US-EU Dialogue on China and the sixth US-EU Indo-Pacific Consultations from Monday to Tuesday. Since the Indo-Pacific consultations were launched in 2021, references to the “one China” policy have appeared in every statement apart from the