Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) and his Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) rival Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) faced off in the second and final televised debate yesterday, with Hsieh attacking Ma's cross-strait economic policy, while Ma criticized the performance of the DPP administration.
Proposing to put the "cross-strait common market" to a public vote in a referendum, Hsieh, in his closing remarks, urged voters who support the common market concept to vote for Ma and voters that oppose it to vote for him.
Hsieh said Ma should be clear in presenting the pros and cons of a cross-straight common market.
PHOTO: CNA
"He is dishonest and cheating the Taiwanese public," Hsieh said. "I am against the `one China market' because it undermines the interests of the 23 million people of Taiwan."
Absolute power breeds absolute corruption, Hsieh said. The public must decide whether they want to see one party control both the legislature and Cabinet or two parties balance each other and drive the country forward.
Ma, meanwhile, said the DPP owed the public an apology for failing to meet their expectations.
"Some argue that the DPP administration has `one not and four noes,'" Ma said. "They do not know how to govern, they have no achievements, no talent, no guts and no integrity."
If elected, Ma said he would bring an end to corruption and usher in an era of clean and transparent government.
At the post-debate press conference, Hsieh said he thought it was strange that Ma skipped the "one China market" issue in his opening and closing remarks. He said he suspected that Ma did not have much confidence in the policy.
Ma also lied about his support for the arms procurement budget, Hsieh said, because the KMT blocked the budget for three years.
In his opening remarks, Hsieh said he would do a better job than Ma and was confident he could deliver on his promises if elected.
"I will protect Taiwan's safety, interests and dignity. This is my promise to this land and our ancestors," Hsieh said. "I will be a protector of Taiwan. Not only I am fit for the presidency, but my destiny is connected with that of the country."
Hsieh lambasted Ma's cross-strait economic policy as "unrealistic," saying a national leader with a sound mind would never pin the country's economic development on the whims of another country.
Hsieh also accused Ma of being inconsistent and changing his position under pressure.
Emphasizing the importance of coexistence, Hsieh said that rival political parties must coexist and Taiwan must coexist with China and the rest of the world.
Ma, meanwhile, said the DPP was responsible for worsening ties with Washington. He also accused the DPP administration of neglecting small and medium-size businesses and the needs of low and medium-income families and residents in central and southern Taiwan.
He promised to protect the country and be the pioneer of a new Taiwan.
Ma said the country had regressed during eight years of DPP administration on four fronts: political stability has worsened, the Cabinet has seen repeated shuffles, corruption has increased and the government has flip-flopped on policies.
"It seems the country is for the DPP, by the DPP and of the DPP," he said.
At a press conference after the debate, Ma accused Hsieh of twisting his policies and failing to answer his questions.
Ma rebutted Hsieh's portrayal of him as pessimist about the nation's future. Ma also said he had not lied about his support for arms purchases.
"Hsieh avoided three-and-a-half of my five questions. I asked him to comment on the performance of Minister [of Education] Tu Cheng-sheng [
In response to Hsieh's challenge over his stance on the Regulations for the Handling of and Compensation for the 228 Incident (
ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY MO YAN-CHIH
Also See: Presidential election 2008: 12 days to go: Hsieh and Ma face the nation
Also See: Presidential election 2008: 12 days to go: Presidential hopefuls spar on critical issues
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS