The Taiwan High Court yesterday found Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) not guilty of corruption. Ma had been indicted on Feb. 13 on charges of embezzling NT$11 million (US$338,000) from his special mayoral allowance during his eight years as Taipei mayor.
The High Court Prosecutor's Office said yesterday it was considering an appeal to the Supreme Court.
The Taipei District Court had cleared Ma in August, but prosecutors had appealed.
PHOTO: REUTERS
Prosecutors argue that Ma diverted half of his monthly special allowance -- NT$170,000 -- to personal bank accounts between December 1998 and July last year.
In this way, they said, Ma had accumulated NT$11,176,227 in accounts held in his name and that of his wife.
"The court ruled that the half of government officials' monthly special allowance not requiring accounting oversight can be cashed out or wired into personal accounts, and that accounting officials have no right to ask how this money is spent," Taiwan High Court spokesman Wen Yao-yuan (溫耀源) told a press conference yesterday.
PHOTO: CNA
Wen said the court upheld the view that government officials have, since 1973, not been required to account for half of their special allowance.
The court ruled that Ma had not overspent any of his allowance and that his use of the allowance had been legitimate, Wen said.
Since Ma made charity donations of more than NT$51 million during his time as mayor, an amount exceeding the special allowance he had received, the court found that he had not embezzled public funds, the spokesman said.
During the trial Ma admitted that he had taken half of his monthly special allowance for personal use, but said he believed that government officials' special allowances should be treated as a subsidy, not as public funds.
Presiding judge Liu Ching-hsing (
"The court rejects the prosecutors' appeal and upholds the Taipei District Court's ruling that Ma Ying-jeou is not guilty," Liu said, drawing cheers from a crowd of Ma supporters waiting outside the courtroom.
Ma's former secretary Yu Wen (
Yu may appeal to the Supreme Court, Wen said.
Ma said in response to the ruling that it would only lead to a more challenging path to the presidency, as he was sure that the ruling party would try to suppress him by using more drastic measures.
Accompanied by five lawyers, Ma accused prosecutors of distorting the testimony of witnesses and applying different standards to similar cases.
He said the judicial system had failed to fulfill its duty, as it had failed to unify prosecutors' opinions on special fund cases.
"I felt calm the moment I heard the verdict. This is just another beginning. A more challenging road lies ahead, and there's no time to relax," Ma said yesterday at his campaign headquarters in Taipei.
"As a Hakka idiom says, `even high mountains can't cover the sun.' The truth will eventually be revealed. A total of six judges have proved my innocence, which just goes to show the prosecutors' case and appeal were both inappropriate and unreasonable," Ma said.
As supporters cheered "Go, go, Ma Ying-jeou" and waved the national flag outside his campaign headquarters, Ma said the six months he spent fighting for his innocence had made him realize that other people could suffer the same "insults and injustice," which was why he vowed to establish an impartial and equitable judicial environment if elected.
Ma accused the government of abusing its power and legal resources to attack him, and said his campaign team was prepared to defend him from further political attacks.
In response to a reporter's question, Ma said that while prosecutors were entitled to file an appeal, he hoped the judicial system would offer a unified interpretation about government officials' special funds.
"I made such suggestions after my initial trial, but no one listened. I would not have ended up in court if prosecutors had investigated my case with the same standards they applied to the pan-green camp's politicians," he said.
Ma said that, if elected president, he would adhere to the current regulations in using his special allowance and would not create new measures regulating the funds.
He declined to comment on whether he would pardon those who are charged with abuse of their special allowances if elected, but said he would seek to solve the issue via other measures, such as revising the law.
Yesterday's acquittal cleared Ma's road to his presidential campaign.
However, local cable channel FTV, citing anonymous sources, yesterday reported that the Democratic Progressive Party(DPP) would soon reveal information implicating Ma in other corruption cases. Among the cases the DPP claimed involved Ma were the KMT's sale of the Broadcasting Corporation of China, China Television Co and the Central Motion Picture Corp to China Times Group subsidiary Jungli Investment Co in 2005 for NT$9.3 billion (US$281.6 million); and the party's sale of the Institute on Policy Research and Development building to Yuan Lih Construction Corp for NT$4.3 billion last year.
Both deals took place when Ma was KMT chairman.
The DPP said yesterday that Ma would not escape public scrutiny, even though the court had cleared him of corruption charges.
"Ma will face a trial by the people on March 20," DPP Caucus whip Cho Jung-tai (
Cho, along with DPP Cultural and Information Department director Hsieh Hsin-ni (謝欣霓) and DPP Legislator Shen Fa-hui (沈發惠), warned that Ma had lost all credibility when he "lied about never having used his special allowance for personal gain."
Hsieh, one of the first DPP lawmakers to question Ma's use of the allowance nearly a year ago, said if it was considered legal for Ma to use his allowance to buy personal items for his wife, daughters and dog, then the Executive Yuan should give back all the money other government officials have returned when they did not exhaust their allotted funds.
"The National Tax Administration should also tax all the government heads who used their allowances and the Judicial Yuan should reopen all the cases in which people have been found guilty of misusing their funds," she said.
Shen said one of the DPP's core values is to respect the judiciary's independence, but urged the public to closely examine presiding judge Liu Ching-hsing's political inclination.
In 1991, the judge had found a defendant guilty of sedition for handing a sticker of a pro-Taiwan independence group to another person, Shen said.
Judges should maintain their neutrality and refrain from participating in political movements, Shen said.
DPP presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (
"It was obvious that Ma committed fraud because he kept changing his story on how he used the money," he said, adding that even if Ma had been found guilty, "I would have pardoned him if I won."
Frank Hsieh's running mate, former premier Su Tseng-chang (
Su said it was common knowledge that Ma had used his mayoral special allowance illegally.
"Many people find the outcome very bizarre, because everyone knows Ma is guilty. His secretary became the scapegoat," Su said.
Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (
"Maybe judges should stop hearing these cases and let the legislature begin on the work of fixing the problems with the system," Wang said.
He said that the Taiwan High Court's verdict in Ma's case created a precedent for other judges hearing similar cases.
ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY JIMMY CHUANG, STAFF WRITER, WITH AGENCIES
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS