The Central Election Commission (CEC) failed to reach a decision yesterday on how legislative election and referendum ballots will be distributed. Commission members could not reach a consensus during their three-hour meeting.
"We failed to reach a conclusion because many members believed that more factors should be taken into account before a decision is made," commission Chairman Chang Cheng-hsiung (
"We will consult with local election commission officials and local government heads and make a decision when we meet next month," Chang said, without giving a date.
PHOTO: CNA
AT ISSUE
The pan-blue and pan-green camps disagree on how ballots for the legislative elections and two referendums -- one proposed by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and one by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) -- should be distributed to voters on Jan. 12.
The DPP's "stolen assets recovery" referendum seeks to force the KMT to return assets it acquired illegally during its decades of authoritarian rule.
The KMT's "anti-corruption" referendum aims to give the legislature the power to investigate allegations of corruption against the president and subordinates.
During the 2004 presidential election -- the first time a referendum was held alongside a national election -- the ballots were issued separately.
Some commission members have suggested that ballots be handed out together to simplify the voting process. Pan-blue politicians and commission members recommended by pan-blue political parties are opposed to the idea.
"What the DPP is trying to do is to tie the referendum to the election, so that the referendum voting rate can reach the 50 percent threshold as stated in [the Referendum] law (
Chao said distributing the ballots together could spark a riot, given the strong ideological divide between the pan-green and pan-blue camps.
"The Central Election Commission should be concerned with ensuring the voting process is smooth and peaceful," Chao said. "If no serious problems occurred last time when the ballots were issued separately, why should we change it?"
Earlier this week, 18 pan-blue local government leaders vowed to have the ballots distributed separately regardless of what the commission decided.
PFP VIEWPOINT
Chao said waiting until next month to make a decision was a "victory."
"It respects the minority opinion, and I'd call it a small satisfactory victory," Chao said. "However, if the commission votes next time, we [the opponents] will certainly lose."
Chao said a majority of commission members support issuing the two ballots at the same time.
A commission member who wished to remain anonymous said Chang was originally going to call a vote on the issue yesterday. The voting did not occur because another member, Chi Chen-nan (
No one could answer the question during the meeting so the vote was put off.
Chi later confirmed the scenario in a telephone call.
Earlier yesterday, DPP caucus whip Wang Tuoh (
"If that happened the KMT would not have enough money to buy votes and the party would eventually fall apart," Wang said.
The KMT's proposal of issuing the ballots separately would lead to a low voter turn-out for the referendum, and that's exactly what the KMT wants, Wang said.
KMT caucus whip Kuo Su-chun (郭素春) dismissed the pan-green camp's accusation that it was afraid that the DPP's referendum on recovering stolen assets would pass.
KMT Legislator Joanna Lei (
Meanwhile, Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) asked why the commission would consider adopting a different way to distribute ballots.
"Issuing ballots separately is better," Wang said. "If this system has proven feasible, we should stick to it. Why do we need to make a drastic change that could cause more controversy?"
At a separate setting, President Chen Shui-bian (
They want the proposed UN referendum to fail, Chen said.
"At one time five ballots were distributed to voters together ... So why can't we do so again this time?" the president said
DPP presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (
"Given that altering the parties in power is a normal thing, it's not right for political parties to boycott the government's policies when they are out of power," Hsieh said.
Additional reporting by Shih Hsiu-chuan, Jimmy Chuang and Flora Wang
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or