A pro-independence group yesterday urged President Chen Shui-bian (
The Taiwan Society made the call yesterday following the Referendum Review Committee's decision on Friday to reject the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) request to hold a referendum on whether to apply for UN membership under the name "Taiwan."
DPP Chairman Yu Shyi-kun filed the proposal with the Central Election Commission (CEC) on May 21. The CEC did a primary review and evaluation of the proposal and then submitted it to the Cabinet's Referendum Review Committee for final authorization.
The opposition-controlled committee rejected the DPP-sponsored initiative 12-8 on Friday, with some committee members arguing that such a referendum was unnecessary as pushing for the country's inclusion in the UN is already government policy.
Seven committee members immediately tendered their resignations following the announcement of the decision on Friday afternoon.
To counter the committee decision, Chin Heng-wei (金恆煒), vice chairman of the Taiwan Society, yesterday proposed that Chen mount a "defensive referendum" on the UN bid if the DPP loses its appeal with the Cabinet's Appeal Committee.
Yu said on Friday that the DPP would lodge an appeal this week against the committee's decision.
Article 17 of the Referendum Law (
Such a proposal would not need to obtain the committee's approval, but it would need the approval of the Executive Yuan.
At the press conference, members of several civic groups, including the Taiwan Society, the Northern Taiwan Society and the Taiwan United Nations Alliance, also accused the committee of defying public opinion over its rejection of the DPP's proposed referendum.
Calling the committee "unconstitutional," Chin called on the DPP administration to request a constitutional interpretation from the Council of Grand Justices to rule on the legality of the committee.
Chin said any UN bid would be doomed if the country used the name the"Republic of China" (ROC) because the People's Republic of China became the representative of China at the UN in 1971 when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime was "kicked out" of the organization.
Convenor of the society's law and politics department Chen Yi-shen (
As the DPP has vowed to appeal, Chen Yi-shen said that if it wins, and two referendims are held, it would be interesting to see whether the public would support the DPP's referendum or the KMT's.
However, he questioned what good the DPP's proposal would do for the country even if it won public support because the country's name in the Constitution is still the ROC, he said.
Janice Chen (
"They could have voted no in the referendum if they were against using the name Taiwan to join the UN," she said. "If they were against the referendum itself, I'd be very curious to know whether they will refuse the KMT's proposal."
public opinion
As 61 percent of the population were in favor of holding a referendum to decide the country's name, she urged the president and the Cabinet to seriously consider holding a referendum on the country's name.
Yosoh Kure (吳煜宗), deputy secretary-general of the Taiwan Society, said the Referendum Review Committee was unconstitutional and its decision indicated that the country's rule of law would enter a dark age if the KMT were to win the presidential election.
The KMT should be dissolved because of the number of illegal and unconstitutional actions in had taken Yosoh said. These had put the country's freedom, democracy and constitutional order at risk, he added.
In Taipei yesterday, President Chen said he was not disappointed at the committee's decision because he had faith in the referendum itself.
`stolen assets'
"This is just the beginning," he said, adding that another DPP referendum proposal about recovering the KMT's stolen assets was initially rejected by the review committee before eventually succeeding on appeal.
It was important that the public supported the campaign to join the UN under the name "Taiwan" because Taiwan is a country and the name of the land, he said.
Additional reporting by CNA
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS