Taiwan's rejection of Beijing's proposed route for next year's Olympic torch relay is not an issue of "credibility" but of "sovereignty," a senior official said yesterday.
Taiwan -- not China -- should be the one to say it was surprised at Beijing's announcement on Thursday that the Olympic torch would be arriving in Taiwan from Vietnam before traveling to Hong Kong and Macau, Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) Vice Chairman Johnnason Liu (
Liu made the comments in the wake of Beijing Organizing Committee for the Olympic Games (BOCOG) vice president Jiang Xiaoyu's (
He accused Taiwan of a "perfidious betrayal of trust" by reneging on an agreement to host a stop on next year's Beijing Olympic torch relay.
Jiang said the BOCOG had been discussing the relay with Taiwan sports officials since November and had received a letter detailing Taipei's agreement to the route on March 27.
"China has a fine tradition of keeping promises," Jiang told a news conference yesterday. "We do not agree with such perfidious betrayals of trust."
However, the BOCOG last week received another letter from Taiwan's Chinese Taipei Olympic Committee (CTOC) chairman Tsai Chen-wei (蔡辰威) indicating that there was a problem.
"The current development of many issues are out of our sports community's control. [Taiwanese] authorities require that the torch must go in and out of Taipei through a third party," Jiang said, quoting from the letter.
"We still hope the Chinese Taipei Olympic Committee and its authorities ... will uphold the consensus they agreed upon and the route that has been approved by the International Olympic Committee [IOC]," Jiang said.
However, Liu rebutted Jiang's claim by providing detailed information on the negotiation process over the torch relay.
Liu said that on Feb. 12, Tsai went to Beijing to attend a meeting and was given a briefing on the torch relay route. Taiwan was told that the Olympic torch would be arriving in Taiwan from Vietnam before traveling to Hong Kong.
Tsai presented Beijing's proposal to Taiwanese authorities, and on March 27 Taiwan sent a letter to Beijing saying it would not object to the plan as long as China did not use it to belittle Taiwan, the information from the council said.
But Beijing has changed its tune, Liu said.
Liu told the news conference that Taiwan later discovered that China had started spreading propaganda, saying that Taiwan would be the torch's first stop within China. China also called Taiwan "Taipei, China," instead of using its formal title as a member of the International Olympic Committee, "Chinese Taipei."
The CTOC therefore sent a letter on April 20 protesting the use of the torch relay route for political purposes and saying that Taiwan could not accept China's attempt to deny its sovereignty, Liu said.
"To avoid a situation in which the torch is described as traveling from `Taipei, China' to `Hong Kong, China,' we asked that the torch enter and exit Taiwan through third countries," the letter said.
But Beijing ignored the request and announced the route on Thursday evening, Liu said.
"A Hong Kong anchor immediately said in a Thursday evening news broadcast that Taipei would be the first stop of the route of the torch in China," Liu said, adding that such examples had surfaced repeatedly over the past month.
Taiwan rejected the arrival of the torch by the arranged route to protect the nation's sovereignty and dignity, Liu said.
"But we will continue to negotiate the torch relay route and to monitor Beijing's attitude about it," Liu said.
President Chen Shui-bian (
At a separate event, Premier Su Tseng-chang (
"Taiwan is a member of the International Olympic Committee. As a member of the committee, we must be treated equally and with respect," Su said. "Unfortunately, China has been seeking all kinds of opportunities to degrade and belittle us. This is unacceptable."
The premier said that the government had been trying to negotiate the issue, but China rejected any such talks.
Su said that Taiwan's athletes would withdraw from the 2008 Olympics if China belittled Taiwan in any way, such as referring to the country as "China, Taipei."
"We will participate under the name `Chinese Taipei,' but we will never accept the name `China, Taipei,'" he said.
Taiwan's rejection marked the first time that an IOC member has declined to be included in the relay route since the torch relay started in 1920 for the Olympics in Brussels.
An analyst in Taiwan said that Beijing could easily settle the issue by agreeing to have the torch come to Taipei from Pyongyang, North Korea, before continuing to Ho Chi Minh City.
China's media heralded the planned route as the "Relay of Friendship."
In addition to Taiwan's objections to the route, the proposal also sparked an outcry from Tibetan independence activists, who slammed the IOC for helping China reinforce its control over Tibet.
Activists are angry that Tibet will be included in the relay, which will pass through Lhasa and scale Mount Everest.
Five US citizens staged a protest at Everest base camp on Wednesday to call for the Himalayan region's independence.
additional reporting by Jimmy Chuang
also see stories:
Tibet protesters to be expelled
Editorial: Good riddance to the Olympic torch
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say