Former president Lee Teng-hui (
Lee made the remarks in an interview with cable station TVBS yesterday afternoon. The station broadcast the interview last night.
"I've never advocated things like pursuing Taiwan's independence in terms of law," he said. "It is wrong for an independent nation to seek independence."
"Taiwan is independent. It owns its sovereignty. How can we go back and pursue independence?" he asked. "The conflict [between pro-independence and pro-unification camps] has continued for the past seven or eight years, but what about the livelihoods of the public? None of these problems were solved."
Lee's remarks came as a clarification to comments attributed to him in an interview with Next Magazine.
The latest edition of the magazine, which hit newsstands yesterday, quoted Lee as saying that he had never been an advocate of independence.
The article prompted speculation that Lee might have changed his stance on the matter, given that Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) Chairman Huang Kun-hui (
Taiwan is not a normal country yet, Lee told TVBS. He said the Constitution does not exist for the sake of Taiwan today and there was a need for the nation to change its title.
"We have to do these things now if we have the opportunity," he said.
The magazine article also quoted Lee as saying that he was in favor of allowing Chinese investors to invest in Taiwan, and that he would welcome opening Taiwan to Chinese tourists to correct Taiwan's "overdependence" on China's economy.
In the TVBS interview last night, Lee said more Chinese tourists should visit Taiwan because the "economic [relationship] should be two-way instead of one-way," but he said this relationship should be "state-to-state" in nature.
Earlier, Huang said that it was wrong to claim that Lee would like to accelerate Chinese investment for its own sake.
Lee believed that Taiwan had suffered too much capital flight to China and that the trend should be reversed, he said.
Huang said that Lee and the TSU's approach had always been a "Taiwan-centered" one.
The magazine also said Lee had been mulling over how to resolve the chasm between the pan-green and the pan-blue camps since last March and that he hoped the TSU, under Huang's leadership, would become Taiwan's new middle force.
Lee was also quoted as saying that he had been on poor terms with President Chen Shui-bian (
Lee said that he was different from Chen because he "believes in God and God's will cannot be betrayed," Lee was quoted as saying.
"In God's eyes, ministers and the believers are the same. When you die, you will be tried on whether you really insisted on justice when you were alive," Lee was quoted as saying when discussing his comments to several pro-Chen Presbyterian ministers last year during the period in which former DPP chairman Shih Ming-teh (
Lee was also quoted as saying that he thought KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
Ma "deliberately works to create [his] charisma," Lee said.
When asked to comment on Lee's remarks, DPP Chairman Yu Shyi-kun said that his party respect any decision Lee would make but that he could not comment on Lee's opinions.
Priority
Ma, however, lauded Lee's comments, and said he expected more political leaders to make Taiwan's future their priority.
"Making Taiwan's future and public interests a priority has always been the KMT's policy. We will be more than happy if political leaders like Lee agree with us," Ma said.
Commenting on Lee saying that he hoped to visit China, Ma said the situation in Taiwan would have been better if Lee had made such a move five or six years ago.
But Ma dismissed Lee's comment that he lacked both resolve and courage, adding that he would like to visit the former president if possible.
In Beijing, a spokesman for the Taiwan Affairs Office refused to comment on Lee's reportedly hopes of visiting China.
At a regular scheduled news conference, Yang Yi (楊毅) said only that "we have noticed that report," when asked about Lee's comments.
Yang also declined to comment on reports that Legislative Yuan Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) would visit China after the Lunar New Year holiday to attend a ceremony marking the establishment of a "national association of Taiwanese enterprises" in China.
Yang said Beijing was willing to have contact with any individual or organization in Taiwan as long as they acknowledged Beijing's "one China" policy and the so-called "1992 consensus" for talks on the development of cross-strait relations and on "eventual peaceful reunification of the two sides."
No consensus
The "1992 consensus" refers to the cross-strait meeting held in Hong Kong in November 1992.
The KMT has long insisted that a consensus was reached at that meeting that both sides should adhere to the "one China" principle, but with each side agreeing to its own interpretation.
Eleven months ago KMT Legislator Su Chi (蘇起) admitted he made up the term "1992 consensus" in 2000 before the transfer of power.
When asked about his reported comment that he was interested in traveling across the Strait, Lee told TVBS last night: "I did not say I wanted to visit China."
"[Such a visit] is unnecessary," he added.
Additional reporting by Mo Yan-chih, staff writer and CNA
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS