A Friday night meeting between Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) continued to spark intense speculation over the possible impact on Saturday's polls.
At the heart of the conjecturing was the possible "dump-save effect" among pan-blue supporters.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers continued to interpret the meeting as evidence of a scheme by Ma to "dump" KMT Taipei mayoral candidate Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) and get Soong elected, which they said would benefit Ma for the 2008 presidential election.
"The Ma-Soong meeting proved that abandoning Hau and saving Soong has become the KMT's key strategy," DPP Legislator William Lai (賴清德) said.
DPP Legislator Hsu Kuo-yung (徐國勇) said that Ma could "kill two birds with one stone" by helping Soong win on Saturday -- to divide the DPP and to unite the pan-blue camp ahead of next year's legislative election and the presidential election the following year.
Hsu referred to the division within the DPP over Taipei mayoral candidate Frank Hsieh's (謝長廷) promise that he would quit the party and join in the campaign to force President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) to step down should Soong beat him.
Since Taipei is largely seen as a pan-blue city, the DPP's interpretation was seen as a strategy to help Soong draw votes from front-runner Hau and boost Hsieh's chances.
However, an anonymous lawmaker said that KMT Vice Chairman Wu Poh-hsiung (
"As Soong remains far behind Hau in the polls, it's hard to believe the party would ask pan-blue supporters to dump Hau and save Soong. Ma will show the party is for Hau in the final week," he said.
KMT spokesman Huang Yu-cheng (黃玉振) would not comment directly on voting strategy but said that experience has shown that a front-runner will not be the one to be abandoned by supporters if a "dump-save tactic" is used.
The PFP also made every effort to refute interpretations of Friday's meeting by the DPP or by the KMT.
PFP Legislator Chang Hsien-yao (
"Ma and Soong met on Oct. 14 and Nov. 3 to talk about forming an alliance between two parties after the election. The latest meeting [last Friday] was supposed to take place on Nov. 30. It also focused on the alliance," Chang said.
The lawmaker said that Ma and Soong had agreed that their two parties would coordinate before nominating candidates for next year's legislative elections.
"Soong didn't make offers to Ma in exchange for the KMT's support, as the DPP has claimed," he said.
The PFP also accused Hsieh of using "government intelligence agencies" to obtain the pictures of Ma and Soong's meeting site.
Hsieh denied the accusation and said he would quit politics if anyone could prove otherwise.
Later yesterday, Soong told a press conference that Friday's meeting had been Ma's idea.
"I felt the meeting was a `set-up,'" Soong said, referring to the rumors that the KMT's voting strategy was to encourage pan-blue supporters to vote for Hau.
Ma said yesterday that he didn't discuss Saturday's election at the Friday meeting, but he refused to reveal details of his conversation with Soong.
also see story:
Editorial: Ma blunder could cost Hau dear
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS