A group of legal experts criticized Chief Prosecutor Eric Chen's (
They said that the Taipei District Court should refuse to accept the case based on Item 1 of Article 303 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (
Other experts, however, said that Eric Chen had not violated the Constitution in questioning the president in connection with first lady Wu Shu-jen's (吳淑珍) indictment on charges of corruption and forgery.
Regarding the president's willingness to relinquish his presidential immunity, Winston Dang (陳重信), director of the Democratic Progressive Party's Department of International Affairs, said in a recent interview with the New York Times that since presidential immunity belongs to the office of president, relinquishing the immunity to criminal prosecution must follow legal procedure and could not be unilaterally decided on by the president himself.
The president is not allowed to serve as a witness in a trial involving the first lady, Dang added.
Some legal experts said that Article 52 of the Constitution is meant to ensure the functioning of the presidency, political stability and foreign affairs, rather than to protect the president as an individual.
One legal expert said that the president made a grave mistake when he decided to give up his presidential immunity to accept the prosecutor's questions without his lawyer's presence, while Eric Chen ignored the intent of Article 52, which could lead to the politicization of the judiciary's role in the case, constitutional controversy and political conflict.
Many experts also say that the intent of Article 52 to guarantee the independence of the judiciary is often ignored. They say that any investigation or indictment of an incumbent president is bound to put the judiciary at the center of a political storm which would threaten and even destroy the judiciary's independence and credibility.
However, legal experts in favor of Eric Chen's decision to interrogate the president believe that he did not violate the Constitution.
They say that Article 52 of the Constitution only stipulates that the president shall not be liable to criminal prosecution, but does not say that the prosecutor is not allowed to list allegations against the president in the indictments of other suspects.
Huang Jui-hua (黃瑞華), president of the Ilan District Court, wrote a letter to the editor of the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times' sister newspaper) on Wednesday accusing Eric Chen and his colleagues of having acted unconstitutionally by investigating the president while still in office.
Article 52 gives the president immunity from criminal investigation unless he is suspected of rebellion or treason, she said.
Huang yesterday said that she neither intended to influence the upcoming court case nor believed judges in the case would be influenced in any way, but was just discussing a constitutional issue, a topic that anyone may raise, and that she had not intended to discuss any "individual case."
"A court president, at any level of the court system, is unlikely to influence a presiding judge today. If he or she still thinks of such a possibility, then he or she is underestimating today's judges," she said.
She made the remarks after being advised in person by Judicial Yuan President Weng Yue-sheng (
Fan Kuang-chun (范光群), secretary-general of the Judicial Yuan, said that the judicial branch had sent memos to all courts reminding them to remain neutral in all cases and to carry out fair and independent trials.
Judges enjoy freedom of expression, but at the same time they should strictly follow guidelines and rules governing their professional behavior, Fan added.
On whether Huang would be disciplined for commenting on the "state affairs fund" case, Fan said only that Weng had spoken to her.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS