The American Chamber of Commerce in Taipei (AmCham) struck a nerve with the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) because of an editorial in the latest edition of its monthly magazine, in which the chamber used unusually harsh language to criticize the government's cross-strait policies.
The editorial in the August issue of Taiwan Business Topics, titled "Conferences don't lead," accused the ruling party of succumbing to the TSU and sidelining important cross-strait issues, which it said would only "weaken Taiwan's competitiveness."
The editorial also expressed AmCham's disappointment at the government's failure to reach a consensus during the two-day Conference on Sustaining Taiwan's Economic Development in July.
PHOTO: CHIEN JUN-FONG, TAIPEI TIMES
"Politics got in the way when the tiny TSU held the meeting agenda hostage to the party's ideological bias against closer economic ties with China," the editorial read.
It went on to say that the TSU, as a pan-green ally, "commands more influence with the government than the number of its supporters warrants, and the party's `spiritual leader,' former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝), still has a following because of his past contributions to building Taiwan's democracy."
In September 1996, then-president Lee proposed a "no haste, be patient" policy as a guideline for Taiwanese investments in China, citing national security.
"But on purely economic grounds, Lee and the TSU are off base," AmCham said.
Without the ability to tap fully into the regional and global business activity that flows through China, Taiwan will be just another medium-sized market of limited interest to international corporations, the editorial read.
"By deferring to the TSU and failing to adopt further opening to China through expanded industrial investment and the opening of banking connections, the government is weakening, not safeguarding, Taiwan's competitiveness," it concluded.
In response, the TSU lashed out at AmCham, saying the organization's interests were not the same as Taiwan's.
"If the American Chamber of Commerce has illusions about the Chinese market and thinks that Taiwan's investment in China is not enough, it can go to the market by itself and does not need to drag Taiwan along into its nightmare," TSU legislative caucus whip Liao Pen-yen (廖本煙) said at a press conference held with other TSU legislators yesterday.
Liao said that the interests of AmCham were not necessarily those of Taiwan, adding that if the US really cares about Taiwan, it would sign a free trade agreement (FTA) and assist Taiwan in joining the UN.
Other TSU officials said it was their party's duty to monitor the government and to raise concerns about the nation's excessive investment in China, because these issues concern Taiwan's sovereignty and future development.
TSU Legislator David Huang (
"The American Chamber of Commerce should not continue guiding the Taiwanese govern-ment's policy and force it to tilt to China. It should not meddle in Taiwan's domestic affairs," Huang said.
"China has 800 missiles targeted at Taiwan and the situation is dangerous for us. We have to play it safe in terms of relaxing restrictions on investment in China," Huang added.
Meanwhile, TSU Secretary-General Lin Chih-chia (林志嘉) yesterday said he did not think the opinions of AmCham represent those of the US government, saying "businesspeople have their own considerations."
"Taiwan has way too much investment in China, and we have virtually no insurance policy," Lin said. "It is reasonable for Taiwan to conduct risk management in terms of those sectors that have excess investment in China."
Lin said businesspeople might not care about the sovereignty issue, but that the TSU was concerned about the long-term development of the country and the importance of defending Taiwan's sovereignty.
Lin also said that AmCham overestimates the TSU's influence.
"The TSU does not have so much influence as to force the Cabinet to go along with us. Perhaps [AmCham] has misunderstood the TSU's stance. We are willing to communicate with it," Lin said.
Meanwhile, the head of the European Chamber of Commerce Taipei (ECCT) agreed with his counterparts at AmCham, saying Taiwan had missed a lot of opportunities because of the govern-ment's cross-strait policies.
"Taiwan has lost its last opportunity to move important cross-strait issues forward during last month's economic conference and were increasingly concerned about the marginalization of Taiwan's economy," Guy Wittich, chief executive officer of the ECCT, said during a telephone interview yesterday.
He said ECCT members are upset about the sidelining of relaxation measures relating to Taiwan's normalization of economic relations with China, including direct transportation links and lifting the ceiling on China-bound investments, which is currently capped at 40 percent of a listed company's net worth.
Such issues, which had originally been removed from the agenda due to the TSU's boycott during the preparatory meetings, were listed as "other opinions" which do not ensure effective implementation.
Although he declined to single out any political party or politician for such policy-making, Wittich reiterated that "Taiwan needs to be a part of the region" and that the "national security" reasoning must not be over-used to hinder the nation's development.
The government must clarify where the bottom line is for national security and carefully study what repercussions it might have on businesses, he said.
"If I were a Taiwanese company, I would've also moved to another market" which provides incentives for investments, instead of punishing businesses, he added.
In the meantime, the government sought to quell the row, saying it was willing to listen to any input the business community might offer.
Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞 昌) said yesterday that the government's China policy is "comprehensive and long range-oriented," including efforts to remove investment obstacles, and that he will seek a consensus to satisfy all parties.
Su said he thanked members of the American, European and Japanese chambers of commerce for making investments based on their confidence in the strength of Taiwan's economy.
"If they have any opinions about our policy, we will respect their views and evaluate their suggestions," Su said.
Sometimes people have differing views about policy issues, he said, but overall and in the long term the government welcomes all investment and is willing to loosen restrictions on it, he said.
"We are open to dialogue with people of different points of view as we do our utmost so that everyone will be satisfied," the premier added.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS