The Council of Grand Justices, the nation's highest court, ruled yesterday that a recently created media watchdog agency, the National Communications Commission (NCC), is unconstitutional.
The grand justices announced specifically that Article Four of the Organic Law of the National Communications Commission (國家通訊傳播委員會組織法) is unconstitutional.
However, they also decided that all decisions made by the commission before yesterday remain valid.
In addition, the council gave the commission members a grace period, saying that the legislature must amend the organic law by Dec. 31, next year.
VALID TERMS
In the meantime, NCC members' three-year terms remain valid if they do not resign.
"Members of the commission are all well-known academics, but their being assigned to current posts is unconstitutional," Minister without Portfolio Hsu Chih-hsiung (
"In addition to urging the legislature to amend the organic law immediately, we also hope that our respected members resign, out of respect for the Constitution," he said.
Along with the request for the constitutional interpretation, the Cabinet also filed a request to temporarily suspend the commission. But the ruling that the NCC is unconstitutional renders such a request irrelevant.
The grand justices said that the law interfered with the Cabinet's exercise of power.
"Basically, grand justices believed that Article Four has usurped the Cabinet's authority as the nation's top administrative government office, which is protected by the Constitution," said Judicial Yuan Secretary-General Fan Kuang-chun (范光群).
The Cabinet filed a request for a constitutional interpretation on Jan. 20 because it believed that Article Four and Article 16 of the law were unconstitutional.
COMMISSION SET-UP
Article Four stipulates that of the 18 seats of the commission, political parties will "recommend" 15 nominees. These 15 had to be apportioned based on the ratio of the parties' legislative seats, which meant the major party in the legislature would have more seats on the commission.
The premier selected the final three nominees. All 18 nominees were required to gain the approval of a nomination committee.
Article 16 regulated that any punishment meted out to media organizations prior to the commission's establishment could be reconsidered upon appeal.
Meanwhile, NCC Chairman Su Yeong-ching (
"Its logic is erroneous and intolerable," Su said.
He said the interpretation assumed that nominees could be influenced by the party that nominated them, an argument he said had no evidence to back it up.
JUSTICES CRITICIZED
"Many justices serving on the Council [of Grand Justices] were recommended by either political parties or non-government organizations," Su said. "Most important, the judges are nominated by the president. So can we also infer from these facts that those judges will be affected by political parties, and will thereby lose the trust of the people?"
Su said that the NCC members have all exercised their independent judgment in reviewing every case they have handled since the NCC began operations.
Su said the nine remaining NCC members -- nine others have already resigned -- would decide on Monday whether to stay on.
The commission has been under a lot of criticism recently for its inefficiency in review cases.
Also see story:
Parties beg to differ on grand justices' NCC interpretation
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS